Modern culture doesn't always value authentic femininity.
Niebuhr said that
modern culture does not have a principle of interpretation that adequately takes into account the unity of man's self - transcendence and his physical life, the meaning of individuality, or the origin of evil.19
The pluralism of
modern culture does much to fragment our attempts at a well - structured identity.
Not exact matches
While it offers benefits and perks like any
modern creative company, Adobe's is a
culture that avoids micromanaging in favor of trusting employees to
do their best.
I don't like it when atheists want to secularize our
culture and shut out any public mention of religion... But I also don't like it when
modern evangelical fundamentalists are so ignorant of the Christian Church's teachings and traditions of two thousand years.
And because they themselves don't come from a cultural assumption of male authority, they see it as a correction to our
modern culture: an eternal, divine mandate to which we need to return.
it is ONLY confusing when people
do nt treat it rightly (by pretending the Bible was originally written in
Modern day English by modern day Americans, using modern day cul
Modern day English by
modern day Americans, using modern day cul
modern day Americans, using
modern day cul
modern day
culture!)
CAMERON: Hillsong United, Bethel, Jesus
Culture, Gateway and countless others: What
do you think has led to the explosion of
modern worship we've seen over the last 15 years?
That doesn't mean
Modern Pagans ignore ideas, beliefs, and deity from outside of Western
Culture; it just means that those impulses are generally filtered through a Western prism.
I am not very unlike you, very cynical of the
modern culture of the «church», but I have found, for me, that to fixate on the problems of the church
does not seem to build the Lingdom of God.
It implies a static understanding of
culture in which God can not
do something new which is consistent with Scripture and thereby provide a fresh musical interpretation which reflects
modern sensitivities.
And by that I don't mean the U.S. I mean
modern Western
culture.
(15) Fortunately the inexhaustible richness of Scripture ensures that our loyalty to it
does not leave us without a relevant word to say to
modern culture but actually unfailingly provides a compelling word to speak into the
culture whatever that is.
due to racism, bigotry and ignorance, most
modern historical books in the west
do not or have not mentioned such historical facts bc for white men who compiled history books, any credit to any area east of Greece would have been too shameful, but again, when you read about ancient Persian
culture and see it in action and look at their tablets and beliefs and artifacts and books, it's quite clear that the Persian Zoroastrian role is all over this....
Though many of them oppose
modern culture, they
do not oppose it in the same way or oppose the same aspects.
Cardinal Raymond Burke gave an interview to a Spanish newspaper and said he
did not wish to criticise Pope Francis but added that he felt the faith was being adapted to suit
modern culture.
Indeed, most
cultures in human history have generated no such marvel as the
modern scientific movement, and even in our own
culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and use the vocabulary of science but
do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.
There are other sins described that are not God's best that in
modern culture have been accepted, divorce, adultery gossiping etc. it doesn't change what God says about these things either.
The most this period could have
done was to buy time for a fuller and better synthesis to be worked out between Catholic theology, and what is either well proven, or at least intrinsically probable in the philosophy of
modern science, and the
culture built upon it.
Modern man destroying information from the ancients down through the ages, and from other
cultures sure don't help matters.
Fosdick sensed this weakness in liberalism when he declared in the 1930s: «What Christ
does to
modern culture is to challenge it.»
How
does one simultaneously not believe in Gof and subscribe to New Age, feel - good
modern church
cultures?
But such reform movements, as efforts to recover the genuine and liberative orientations of the
modern experience of reason, were either ignored by the dominant
modern cultures or, when they succeeded, they
did so only because they adapted the dominative power techniques of manipulation and control typical of the social orders and
cultures against which they initially protested.
Culture, for
modern scholars (and also in colloquial use), has nothing to
do with Matthew Arnold's deployment of universal standards of reason and taste to identify «the best which has been thought and said in the world.»
If the only reason you can't believe in God is based in the fact that you're all offended that the universe isn't all puppies and rainbows, then you didn't understand the contents of the Bible or its intended lessons and you just instead subscribe to New Age feel - good
modern church
cultures.
Perhaps more impressive is the evidence of
modern excavation, revealing as it
does the influences that beat upon this little land in every age from all the
cultures of the ancient East.
Modern culture sensed that naturalism
did not comprehend the self - transcendent human spirit, and that idealism lost spirit when it
did not conform to the pattern of rationality.
The most remarkable thing about the international embrace of technology is that
modern humanity has agreed with Christianity that we have a right, indeed a duty, to change the world — a notion many
cultures do not swallow easily.
The implications don't just provide for thought - proving questions about
modern culture, but also about the nature of truth itself.
When that
culture started changing in the early 20th century, the small «c» church didn't change with it but kept redoubling its efforts in the 19th century mode (albeit w / some
modern technological updates).
All these formulations about God's disappearance from
modern culture, says Altizer,
do not get at the heart of the matter.
However, although Hall is clearly sympathetic to much in the «gnostic sensibility» as thus characterized (cf. UP 336 - 46), and although, as we have seen, he regards
modern technology as the manifestation of a tendency in Western thought and
culture of which he is highly critical, he
does not himself recommend «a revolt against contemporary forms of technology,» at least as that phrase would ordinarily be understood.
Fortunately, a large majority of poor and religious Indians
do not live within the
modern culture of materialism; they are invulnerable to the glamour of the CEO, the investment banker, the PR executive, the copywriter, and other gurus of the West's fully organized consumer societies.
At several points he touches upon the paradoxes of
modern urbanism and the tragic ironies of our cultural attitude toward cities: although we now have more individual freedom, technical ability, and, arguably, social equity, we
do not live in places as hospitable to human beings as were our cities of the past; we are pragmatists who build shoddily; our current obsession with historic preservation is the flip side of our utter lack of confidence in our ability to build well; while
cultures with shared ascetic ideals and transcendent orientation built great cities and produced great landscapes,
modern culture's expressive ideals, dogmatic public secularism, and privatized religiosity produce for us, even with our vast wealth, only private luxury, a spoiled countryside, and a public realm that is both venal and incoherent; above all, we simultaneously idolize nature and ruin it.
A Year of Papal Caritas Which of us predicted, reading the sermon delivered after the death of Pope John Paul by the then (but only just) Cardinal Josef Ratzinger, with its frontal attack on relativism and the secularisation of
modern culture, that the secularists would come to respond as violently as over the last two years - in England, then in Madrid and Germany - they have
done to this Pope's steadfast anti-secularism?
Reject the dogma and doctrine, and all you have left is the selfish reasoning of «I
do it because I like to
do it» - which is a self - righteous and stereotypical American Post
Modern Individualist way of thinking - the very
culture that is self - destructing around us.
If my colleague Brad Gregory's historical assessment is true, and if Ephraim Radner's «Protestant version» of the Reformation's purported beneficial effects» that it «gave us back our consciences, granted us freedom, unleashed reason,» etc., and has given rise to
modern secular institutions that have exercised caritas even better than have Christian institutions» are arguable if not actually overstated, what then are
modern Christians (Protestant and Catholic) to
do in the face of contemporary
culture's relentless hostility to sacred things?
A huge problem in our
modern culture is that people just don't know how to cook any more.
I don't like this
modern day football
culture its embarrassing and the
culture created and now at Arsenal
But i must complement wenger he has changed the
culture of the club and given the team a spirit But
does that give him the right to neglect the needs of the fans for some trophies Arsenal tickets are the most expensive yet the fans settle for good football as opposed to winning football as mentioned on this blog i don't get it But wenger knows once you keep the share holders happy then your in business It puzzles me that a
modern manager can go six (6) yes six seasons without a single trophy and some people can come here making bone dry excuses, the ambition of the club has dropped wenger can coach at no other top club in Europe and not win a trophy he would be shown the door.
After reading more of Charlotte Mason's ideas about art appreciation, I knew that I didn't wanted my children just to
do preschool art activities, but also become familiar with the art and music of our
modern culture, as well as that of the artists that have gone before us.
When we think of all the horror stories we've been told about what will happen if we don't follow a laundry list of rules about how to raise our children in today's
modern, Western society, you can bet that pretty much none of it applied to our early ancestors (or even other
cultures today).
Having a baby changes one's life, and current
culture in
modern cities just
does not provide the network of support mothers need.
These traditions suggest, that we don't so much need to learn how to listen, but unlearn all of the habits we've developed from our
modern culture of rushing around, and not having the time to fully listen or be heard.
I don't think you can draw any conclusions about the health aspects of breast feeding after the age of ~ 12 months in a
modern 1st world country from studies of 3rd world
cultures.
They speak their own Language (Aranese, a
modern version of Occitan), they have their own
culture and traditions, their people doesn't hold a free nation or state for itself, and they aknowledge themselves as a distinct...
As we have seen in the case of Barclays, and News International, the
culture set from the top matters, and it matters that in a
modern society we don't have unelected legislators sitting unaccountably in a golden palace.
They speak their own Language (Aranese, a
modern version of Occitan), they have their own
culture and traditions, their people doesn't hold a free nation or state for itself, and they aknowledge themselves as a distinct people, all four requirements to be a stateless nation and to possess the right to Self - determination.
Neuroethicist Wrye Sententia, acting director and cofounder of the nonprofit Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics (CCLE), responds that fears of a new drug
culture à la the «tune in, turn on, drop out» 1960s just
do not apply to the
modern better - living - through - chemistry model.
If everybody's going
modern, what
does it mean to preserve
culture?