Not exact matches
Current
data suggest that
modern humans evolved from archaic humans primarily in East Africa.
Willerslev says the
data suggest the following scenario: After
modern humans spread out of Africa about 60,000 years ago, they encountered Neandertals and interbred with them, perhaps in the Middle East.
«Our
data show this process was ongoing two and a half million years ago, which allows us to consider a very drawn - out and gradual evolution of the
modern human capacity for language and
suggests simple «proto - languages» might be older than we previously thought,» Morgan added.
The DNA
data suggest not one but at least two instances of interbreeding between archaic and
modern humans, raising the question of whether Homo sapiens at that point was a distinct species (see sidebar).
Their
data suggest that
modern humans and Neanderthals may have actually lived in the area at completely different times, never crossing paths there at all.
Anthropological
data suggest that those cultures subsisting entirely or largely on native, unrefined foods prepared according to time - honored traditions enjoy better health than peoples consuming a largely refined diet of
modern foods.
In it, I demonstrated that one could use
modern data and easily reproduce EEOS - type correlations that, if interpreted naively,
suggest that families matter and that schools and neighborhoods do not.
Current interpretation of Y - chromosome and mtDNA
data suggests that
modern - day Portuguese trace a significant amount of these lineages to the paleolithic peoples who began settling the European continent between the end of the last glaciation around 45,000 years ago.
Our analysis of 200 - year climatic oscillations in
modern times and also
data of other researchers referred to above
suggest that these climatic oscillations can be attributed to solar forcing.
As to «
modern ocean temperature
data», this 2012 study again reaches quite different conclusions than you
suggest:
This
data seems to
suggest modern warming stronger than that seen in the medieval periods displayed (see figure 2): «Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate»
If rising greenhouse gas emissions sometimes seem like an inevitable byproduct of
modern prosperity, new
data suggests that need not be the case.
This is safely impossible to falsify with the reliable, unadjustable
modern era
data, but an unbiased fit to the 33 year
data suggest net - neutral feedback as the most likely univariate extrapolation.
Temperature histories from paleoclimate
data (green line) compared to the history based on
modern instruments (blue line)
suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer.