I have yet to find a creationist (ID) that can explain even the basics of
modern evolutionary theory with any accuracy.
Not exact matches
Process thought is usually defined in one of three ways: (1) as any view of reality that is dynamic and relational and based on the findings of
modern science, (2) identified
with «the Chicago School,» the University of Chicago Divinity School, both in its earlier phase of applying
evolutionary theory to historical research, seeing religion as a dynamic movement that reconstitutes itself in response to felt needs, as well as its later philosophical phase, and (3) synonymous
with the philosophy of Whitehead and Hartshorne.
But to have stressed his theses of the part which an increasing awareness of temporality has played in the genesis of
modern science, and to have indicated the way in which he parallels his
theory of levels of duration
with the «chaining» of integration / differentiation leaves one fascinating problem unsolved: namely, that of how, given what is known of genetics, Bergson could have imagined that the «vital impetus» effects its
evolutionary saltations.
Darwin's
theory of fecundity selection, together
with the principles of natural selection and sexual selection, remains a fundamental component of
modern evolutionary theory.
Darwin did not explain «all», but still is considered one of the major
modern scientists (please note I did not specify one Darwin over the other in case you are familar
with modern evolutionary theory or say which one deservers the accolades).
According to
evolutionary theory, women find men
with resources (e.g., money and status) to be more desirable partners than those who have relatively fewer resources.1 After all, resources have historically increased individuals» chances of survival, and in many ways resources are still important in
modern society.