I felt as if I was at some museum of natural science touring an exhibit on the remains of an evolutionary branch that had somehow died out before it achieved the final,
modern form by which we now know it.
Not exact matches
If your time and energy is being sapped
by saying «yes» to requests — that includes engaging with people over social media, which is a
modern form of «people pleasing» — then you need to do a hard pivot and literally rehearse saying «no.»
Guidance, the other
form of UMP, is simply a
modern version of moral suasion and window guidance, which were actively used
by most central banks through the 1950s and 1960s (if not later).
By extension, evolving from less advanced life
forms is distasteful to those same individuals, as that necessitates a point in evolution at which humans are not really humans at all in the
modern sense, which then brings up problems such as «do slugs go to heaven?»
The recent and dramatic rise of
modern Gnosticism, implemented in part,
by the capture of the vocabulary of reality, is merely the continuation of the effort, identified
by Eric Voegelin, to
form a Western civil theology
by immanentizing the Christian eschaton.
(The semi-mythical Paul was supposed to have died during the persecutions instigated
by Nero in c. 64 C.E.) Some of the Pauline epistles appear to be have been altered and edited numerous times before reaching their
modern forms.
The theory of societies, like
modern general systems theory, pictures a world made up of societies within societies (systems within systems) That is, societies do not just line up side
by side like mosaics — they
form «nested hierarchies» that go from subatomic particles through cells to animal bodies, or through stars to galaxies.
Economics, at least in the classical and neoclassical
forms that have dominated its
modern development, is a science that analyzes interactions as exchanges relevant to ends determined
by consumer preferences, such that the ends lie beyond the domain of the inquiry.
Bergson was the eloquent defender of this thesis in
modern times (TFW), and Whitehead accepts it when he agrees that creativity is «inexplicable
by forms.»
Modern interpreters tell us that the people possessed
by demons in the Gospels probably suffered from
forms of mental illness.
Mr Deighan will have read in these pages «something very close» to the idea that Thomistic epistemology tends to emphasise «immutable essences» and static
forms, and that this emphasis has been powerfully challenged
by the success of
modern science (for example Jaeger's article in our last issue and in our September 2006 issue the editorial and the quotes from Ronald Knox's God and the Atom).
It was
formed in 1972 with the aim of advancing the Catholic faith in the
modern world
by working together to attract many to discipleship of Jesus Christ.
It is just that
modern Christian
forms of «leadership» look nothing like the leadership modeled
by Jesus.
However, we must remind ourselves of a vital historical fact, which is that many of these
forms of supernaturalism were attacked, and at least partially overthrown,
by biblical religion long before the advent of
modern science.
If that is the problem, it will not be solved
by a more precise understanding of the
forms of reason and authority that have validity for the
modern mind.
Like the ancient apocalyptic seer, the
modern artist has unveiled a world of darkness, but whereas earlier seers could know a darkness penetrated
by a new æon of light, the contemporary artist has seen light itself as darkness, and embodied in his work an all - embracing vacuity dissolving every previous
form of life and light.
This is illustrated with striking clarity
by the history of
modern philosophy, at least in its continental (and, so to speak, proper)
form.
For, as I say, we
moderns believe in nothing: the nothingness of the will miraculously giving itself
form by mastering the nothingness of the world.
One of the consequences of the focus on the role of interpretive communities has been a renewed appreciation for the
forms of interpretation practiced
by Jewish and Christian communities before the rise of
modern biblical studies during the Enlightenment.
Even
modern forms of mass evangelism in which this same question is put very pointedly
by the evangelist and great stress is laid upon the assurance of salvation are under suspicion
by many.
The air, sunlight, soil, forests, various life
forms and water are all being affected adversely
by the
modern industrial, commercial culture which is not establishing a sustainable relationship with the natural world.
Or were you only saying that the
modern Western nations had «excommunicated Christ» and that was one
form of apostasy and your other two examples were other
forms of apostasy that were likewise punished
by God?
The dominant view in
modern philosophy was the version of realism espoused
by Descartes and Locke, a version which took the
form of a «representative theory perception.»
The struggle against this tendency to make the keeping of rules independent of the surrender to the divine will runs through the whole history of Israelite - Jewish faith — from the prophet's protest against sacrifice without intention and the Pharisees» protest against the «tinged - ones» whose inwardness is a pretence up till its peculiarly
modern form in Hasidism, in which every action gains validity only
by a specific devotion of the whole man turning immediately to God.
What the term is meant to designate is indicated rather indirectly
by the character of
modern church architecture and
by the perverted
form in which the idea occurs.
Though this theory of knowledge as detached reflection appeals to our cultural prejudices,
formed as they are
by an unreflective scientism, it is a relatively
modern notion that has been thoroughly dismantled
by the phenomenological tradition.
George Soros in America and Jane Kelsey in New Zealand have both referred to «market fundamentalists»,
by which they mean those who reject all
modern forms of socialism and government interference in economic issues, and who seek a return to the free market and private enterprise of pre-
modern society.
We can not share in this mythological picture, continues Bultmann, because we live and think within «the world - picture
formed by modern natural science» and within «the understanding man has of himself in accordance with which he understands himself to be a closed inner unity that does not stand open to the incursion of supernatural powers.
The fact that
modern science is nonetheless typically accused
by Aristotelian / Thomistic metaphysicians of neglecting «formal cause» shows that they are working with adifferent notion of
form than are contemporary physicists and mathematicians.
While he... obviously does not lack a uniform grasp of the whole, he does not build it up from abstract terms in the
form of our
modern scientific systematics, but everywhere in terms of the concrete and real conditions he has to deal with;... nowhere does he present an overview systematically summarized [Luthers Theologie,
by Theodosius Harnack]
Shahzad Masih and Shama Bibi were bonded laborers (seen
by many as a
modern form of slavery) at a brick - making kiln who lived in a small Punjab town named for the first Anglican missionary to Pakistan.
This freedom is particularly evident in the
modern arts, in which unrestrained experimentation with new
forms, unshackled
by preconceptions or traditional standards, is expected and encouraged.
When one appeals to «the world - picture
formed by modern natural science» as the common basis for understanding man and his world, do we not have to be more definitive and discriminating within scientific imagery itself than either Bultmann or Ogden appear to be?
In a phrase, the
modern rite in its present
form fails to deliver in quite the same way and with the same immediacy that was conveyed
by the old.
While Mary may have never been called an apostle, there was an apostle Junia (Rom 16:7 — the «of note among the apostles» that the ESV and other masculinist translations try to pigeonhole this into is a
modern invention, not at all supported
by biblical Greek; it was only even created when the masculinists finally had to admit that there was no manuscript evidence for transforming the name into «Junias», a masculine
form), and there certainly was a Priscilla who «instructed Apollos» (Acts 18) and who was lauded
by Paul as a «fellow worker» (Rom 16:3), as were numerous other women, such as Phoebe the deacon (Rom 16:1).
Among the most provocative is that
by Daniel V. A. Olson, which takes issue with the notion that
modern urban life weakens all
forms of religion.
It is for a
modern mind,
formed by historical criticism, that companionship with Jesus and the encounter with the resurrected Lord are distinct things.
Aristotle provided MacIntyre with an account of why our actions require a conception of an end as well as the social and political conditions necessary to sustain a life
formed by the virtues constitutive of that end that is simply lacking in
modern moral practice and theory.
Medieval and early
modern Europe developed
forms of federated empire, and the European Union is a postmodern covenant of nations, albeit one distorted
by its adherence to liberalism.
The contemporary ecological crisis represents a failure of prevailing Western ideas and attitudes: a male oriented culture in which it is believed that reality exists only as human beings perceive it (Berkeley); whose structure is a hierarchy erected to support humanity at its apex (Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes); to whom God has given exclusive dominance over all life
forms and inorganic entities (Genesis 1 - 2); in which God has been transformed into humanity's image
by modern secularism (Genesis inverted).
This was, in fact, a
form of faith that denied the relevance of the Judeo - Christian tradition for
modern life
by denying it any place in the study program.
We are, precisely, delivered into a
modern form of tradition - historical awareness
by this confrontation.
«Again, the corrupt and unsound
form of speaking in the plural number to a single person, you to one, instead of thou, contrary to the pure, plain, and single language of truth, thou to one, and you to more than one, which had always been used
by God to men, and men to God, as well as one to another, from the oldest record of time till corrupt men, for corrupt ends, in later and corrupt times, to flatter, fawn, and work upon the corrupt nature in men, brought in that false and senseless way of speaking you to one, which has since corrupted the
modern languages, and hath greatly debased the spirits and depraved the manners of men; — this evil custom I had been as forward in as others, and this I was now called out of and required to cease from.
A
modern criticism in the same vein argues that for higher
forms to have evolved
by chance is like the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard will assemble a Boeing 747 aircraft from the materials there.
It has depersonalized social controls based on family and community ties and has contributed to the continuing negative attitudes that society holds toward homosexuality — the rationalistic and efficiency - oriented character of
modern bureaucracies is thought
by most of society to be inconsistent with more diffuse
forms of sexual expression that homosexuality suggests to many people.
In the discussion that follows, one work
by each writer is assumed to embody his respective position: Blackmur's
Form and Value in
Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of Ideas (AI).
With regard to the production of knowledge it was driven
by a twofold agenda: circulating
forms of knowledge that «proved» the passive, irrational, traditional, immoral, backward and exotic nature of the Oriental (Eastern) world, and routinized the active, rational,
modern, moral, progressive and realistic nature of the Occidental (Western) world.
The more seriously religious
forms of Judaism, especially the Orthodox, have yet to demonstrate that there are authentically religious warrants
by which publicly assertive Judaism supports, rather than threatens,
modern democracy.
To the valid theme of the Christological ethic worked out
by van Buren add the emphasis on Protestant worldliness both as an interpretation of the Reformation and as an attack on certain
forms of
modern sensibility.
The benefits provided
by the
modern media permit us to make our views known to our MPs and to anyone we think has influence in framing law and in
forming, and informing, public opinion.