But the main issue is that
the modern game criticism process is fundamentally flawed.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, the
criticism Arsene takes is now the way in the
modern game,
modern football.
After posting my opinion piece where I defended Call of Duty:
Modern Warfare 3, I quickly received much
criticism for essentially doing what I set out to try and oust: Battlefield 3 fanboyism, or at least trying to silence the people who bashed the
game for being terrible and a milking of the franchise while singing praise of its rival.
[This week, our partnership with
game criticism site Critical Distance brings us picks from Kris Ligman on topics including Kotaku's recent defense of its content, content degradation in
Modern Warfare 3, and more.]
During an interview with IndieGames.com, Rodriguez was asked if the recent
criticism leveled at
modern Japanese
games by entirely likable and not - smug - at - all indie developers, Jonathan Blow and Phil Fish - who I shall now collectively refer to as BlowFish, witty and original wordsmith that I am - was justified.
While all these
criticisms are justified, there is still a lot to enjoy about the
game, its combat system is simple but fun, the soundtrack is incredible, and most of all: the story is one of best narratives in any
modern game.