Sentences with phrase «modern global warming trend»

While there is general agreement about the modern global warming trend (since 1850), scientific controversies increase as climate research moves further back in time, and predictions move further into the future.

Consequently, any correlation between sun and climate ended in the 1970's when the modern global warming trend began.

Note that for each data set, the full - sample (about 30 years) trend is within the confidence interval of the 10 - year trend — so there's no evidence, from any of the data sets, that the trend over the last decade is different from the modern global warming trend.

As the adjacent chart from the NTZ article documents, NOAA's definitive manipulations of a U.S. states climate records to enhance the modern global warming trend is indisputable.

``... there's no evidence... that the trend over the last decade is different from the modern global warming trend.»

This means that when modern global warming trend began in the 1970's, the correlation between sun and climate broke down.

Note in particular the close correlation after 1980 during the modern global warming trend.

Not exact matches

Pete # 13, I think the idea is not so much that AMO contributes to the global warming trend, but rather that it overlays the modern temperature record in such a way that a «naive» analysis ignoring it will find a slightly greater trend than is really there.

If the warming trend of the early 20th century had continued (it didn't) until the end of the 21st century (2099), global temperatures would have increased by +1.92 °C; yet despite the huge modern era CO2 spike, if the warming trend represented by the last 3 decades continued (it won't), the increase by 2099 would only be +1.72 °C.

• If modern warming were to revert to the earlier warming trend (after the «hiatus»), by year 2100AD global temperatures would increase by +0.65 °C.

The UN's IPCC claim that large modern consumer / industrial CO2 emissions are causing maximum temperatures to increase across the globe proves to be without any empirical and scientific merit... NOAA's NCDC division documents U.S. maximum temperatures are exhibiting a declining trend, not catastrophic «global warming»...

Furthermore, see the following for an alternative account, where recent modern temperatures were warmer than the vast majority of the Holocene, reversing a long - term cooling trend: «A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years»

«Modern science», meaning Man made global warming is attacked because it calls a global cooling trend an accelerated warming (IPCC AR4).

Responding to and in the manner of KK Tung's UPDATE (and, you can quote me): globally speaking the slowing of the rapidity of the warming, were it absent an enhanced hiatus compared to prior hiatuses, must at the least be interpreted as nothing more than a slowdown of the positive trend of uninterrupted global warming coming out of the Little Ice Age that has been «juiced» by AGW as evidenced by rapid warming during the last three decades of the 20th Century, irrespective of the fact that, «the modern Grand maximum (which occurred during solar cycles 19 — 23, i.e., 1950 - 2009),» according to Ilya Usoskin, «was a rare or even unique event, in both magnitude and duration, in the past three millennia [that's, 3,000 years].»

The UK's HadCRUT4 global empirical evidence makes it very clear: modern acceleration of warming temperatures is not unprecedented, nor unusual due to CO2 emissions; nor does the modern period exhibit any warming trend that comes close to even 1.5 °C per century.

Wu et al. (7, 8) pointed out the importance of this mode in the modern global temperature record with a period of 65 y: If it is interpreted as natural and related to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO)(9 ⇓ ⇓ — 12), then the trend attributed to anthropogenic warming should be significantly reduced after ∼ 1980, when the AMO was in a rising phase.