Using CT scans of ancient and
modern human skulls, the researchers created digital brain reconstructions, based on the shape of the inner surface of each skull's braincase.
To work out just how different, Denion's team examined 100
modern human skulls and 120 ape skulls — 30 each belonging to gibbons, orangutans, gorillas and chimpanzees.
I find it rather easy to distinguish
a modern human skull from that of an ape or monkey.
Because its brain was far smaller than any human, creationists have no choice but to call this an ape, despite the fact that 1470 looks more similar to 1813 than it does to
a modern human skull.
Creationists sometimes give the impression that it is
a modern human skull.
Modern human skull (left) and Neanderthal skull (right) at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, 2008.
Not exact matches
It is a fact is that fossil
skulls have been found that are intermediate in appearance between
humans and
modern apes.
Piltdown man, discovered in 1911, was widely accepted by paleontologists; in 1953, fluorine tests and X-ray spectrographs showed that a
modern ape's jawbone had been skillfully disguised to match a
human upper
skull.
«According to our analysis of the
skull, which bears a complex mix of archaic and
modern characteristics, this was probably the only place on earth where Neanderthals and anatomically
modern humans lived side by side for a long period of time.»
Instead the
skull indicates that
modern humans met and interbred with Neanderthals in Israel, only to later pass on their genes to the rest of the world.
«Ancient
skull shows
modern humans colonized Eurasia 60 - 70,000 years ago.»
«The morphology of the
skull indicates that it is that of a
modern human of African origin, bearing characteristics of early European Upper Palaeolithic populations.
«If
modern humans indeed moved from Africa 70,000 years ago to Israel, this
skull means they settled in the Levant for a long period of time, before moving to Europe (45,000 years ago).
It is interesting that the most similar
skulls in our sample come from recent Africans on the one hand, and on the other hand from those
modern humans that lived in Europe between 20 - 30,000 years ago as, for instance,... [in one location] in the Czech Republic.»
A new study claims that the hobbit (lower photo) shares traits with
modern humans afflicted with cretinism (top
skull).
Dr. Charlier argues that
human remains in museums and scientific institutions can be divided into four categories, «ethnographical elements» such as hair samples with no certain identification; anatomical remains such as whole skeletons or
skulls; archaeological remains; and more
modern collections of
skulls, used in now discredited studies in the early 20th century.
And the variation in
skull size and facial shape is no greater than in other species, including both
modern humans or chimps, says Ponce de León — especially when the growth of the jaw and face over a lifetime are considered.
Look at a primate or a Neanderthal
skull and compare it with a
modern human's.
Curnoe nicknamed the bones the Red Deer Cave people; he and his colleagues compared them with
modern and contemporary
human remains from Asia, Australia, Europe, and Africa, as well as with Pleistocene East Asian hunter - gatherer
skulls.
The team analyzed the projection of the brow ridge, facial shape, and cranial volume of 13 early Homo sapiens that lived before 80,000 years ago; 41
modern humans that lived 38,000 to 10,000 years ago; and
skulls from a global sample of 1367 recent
humans.
The shapes and sizes of thousands of
skulls from all over the globe point to a single origin in sub-Saharan Africa for
modern humans, according to a recent study.
The oldest known H. sapiens
skulls, which his team considers to be the two Moroccan finds, have faces shaped like those of
modern humans, Neubauer says.
They have thinner brow ridges and less robust
skull bones, similar to early
modern humans and some other Asian fossils.
Homo habilis is argued out of existence altogether; the famous East African
skull, ER 1470 (which some, but nowadays by no means all, authorities class with Homo habilis) somehow becomes a
modern human representative.
It is similar in shape to recent African
skulls as well as to European
skulls from the Upper Paleolithic period, but different from most other early anatomically
modern humans in the Levant.
The
skull of a female found on the Flores island is less than one - third the size of the
skull of
modern humans.
Scientists have finally been able to tackle a much - debated topic about the shape of Neanderthals»
skulls compared to
modern humans.
Creationists interpret this to mean that it was the
skull of a
modern human; in fact, Bowden (1981) thinks it «probably the most convincing evidence» of this.
A
human skull fragment recently unearthed at Manot Cave in Israel provides strong evidence that both anatomically
modern Homo sapiens and Neanderthals...
The Neanderthal
skull showed that its brain was much bigger than the average
modern human's — around 20 % bigger.
The fact that dozens of erectus fossils exist and that their
skull anatomy in particular is quite different from
modern humans is concealed.
(Compare the Turkana Boy
skull and a
modern human here.)
There are no unambiguous archaic sapiens in Asia but two recently - discovered
skulls from China seem to have the flattened erectus - type foreheads, yet their ECV's are apparently close to the
modern human average and their faces are flatter than the usual erectus specimens.
H. erectus
skulls are much smaller than those of equivalently - sized
modern humans.
Let us grant, for the moment and for the sake of argument, AIG's claim that the
skull sizes of Homo erectus fall within the range of
modern humans.
So, another question for AIG: if the Dmanisi
skulls are H. erectus, and erectus
skulls are «within the range of people today», could they please provide some evidence of
modern humans with similar brain sizes?
Modern human basal length grows at 0.052 mm / yr after the late - juvenile stage; so using Cuozzo's logic the two adult orangutans must have been 596 and 788 years old, respectively (plus the 7 years to reach the age of the juvenile
skull).
So although the extreme lower range of
modern human brain sizes does overlap that of Homo erectus, their
skulls are very different: in H. erectus, the brain case really is smaller in relation to the rest of the
skull.
NEW YORK — The
skull of a newly discovered 325 - million - year - old shark - like species suggests that early cartilaginous and bony fishes have more to tell us about the early evolution of jawed vertebrates — including
humans — than do
modern sharks, as was previously thought.
Moreover, unlike
modern humans with low brain sizes, these
skulls are very robust, with flattened braincases and large brow ridges.
Gould reexamined Morton's data on cranial capacity variation in
modern human populations and concluded that Morton had selectively reported data (see Box 1), manipulated sample compositions (see Box 2), made analytical errors, and mismeasured
skulls in order to support his a priori views on intelligence differences between
human groups.
To accompany the retrospective, «For the Love of God» (2007)-- a platinum cast of a
human skull set with 8,601 flawless pavé - set diamonds — is on exhibition in the Tate
Modern's monumental turbine hall.
A platinum cast of a
human skull set with 8,601 VVS to flawless pavé - set diamonds diamonds, the sculpture has previously been exhibited at the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam (2008) and Tate
Modern, London (2012) amongst others, but has never before been shown in Scandinavia.