As
modern humans were first migrating out of Africa more than 60,000 years ago, Neanderthals and Denisovans were still alive and well in Eurasia.
Not exact matches
First, its premisses concerning society and
modern man
are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God
was invented when the
human race
was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that
were appropriate when his thought processes
were primitive; the affirmation that the
modern world has
been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible
is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these
are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about
modern man or present - day society.)
The real content of many so - called
modern difficulties
are as old as the eternal hills, as old as
human pride, as hoary as the «non serviam» which
was uttered by the
first man and has
been re-echoed since down the centuries.
(R. M. MacIver: The
Modern State, pp. 103 - 104) It
was the glory of Roman jurists in the early centuries A.D. that they
first conceived the jus gentium, the natural law of all peoples, as incorporating the duties and rights which belonged to
human beings everywhere.
Much of the discussion of the
first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has
been subject to criticism, and certainly
modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between
human and other forms of life.
Maybe
modern science
is wrong and the world really
is only 6,000 years old... maybe God created primates to turn into
humans, and the
first to become man
was Adam... maybe the Big Bang theory
was God on the
first day creating the heavens and the universe... the fact
is, I don't know.
The
first effect of the
modern view of history and
human existence upon New Testament study
was, as we have seen, to focus attention upon the kerygma as the New Testament statement of Jesus» history and selfhood.
To teach, as some writers have, that we must accept the «insight» of
modern Evolutionists, as true beyond reasonable doubt, that
humans came into existence in various places at differing times (so - called «Polyphyletism»)
is to compromise the Church's infallible teaching that there
was one
first man (Adam) and one
first woman (Eve) from whom we all descend.
And the fact
is that two Catholic priests, Gregor Mendel, O.S.A., and Georges Lemaitre,
were pivotal figures in creating two of the most important scientific enterprises of the twenty -
first century:
modern genetics, which
is giving humanity previously unimaginable powers over the
human future; and
modern cosmology, which
is giving us glimpses of the universe in the
first moments of its existence.
First it requires us to find and describe what Tillich called the «boundary situations,» that
is, those points where
modern men and women reach the limits of their
human existence, where they sense they
are alienated from society and other people, or feel a lack of personal meaning, or fear
being useless and having no worth.2.
First of all, it implies some superficial beliefs about the place of sexuality in
human experience (we might regard these as
being in the antechamber of the temple of sacred sexuality proper): the belief that sexuality
is a key, perhaps even the key, component of the quality of
being human (in this, of course, lies the pervasive heritage of Freud); the belief that
modern Western culture, and especially American culture, has unduly suppressed sexuality (this
is the anti-Puritan aspect of the proposition), and, that, as a result, not only
are we sexually frustrated (and that frustration carries all sorts of physical and psychological pathologies in its wake), but our entire relation to our own bodies as well as the bodies of others has become distorted.
First, it requires exploring with people what theologian Paul Tillich called the «boundary situations,» those points at which
modern men and women reach the limits of their
human existence, where they sense a lack of personal meaning, or fear
being useless and worthless.
The striking works of Pratt, India and Its Faiths (1915) and A Pilgrimage of Buddhism (1928) did much to make these religions come alive for the
first time for many Western readers; for Pratt had a gift not only of brilliance but of extraordinary
human sympathy.10 These
are clear instances of the increasing mobility of
modern man: each book
was written as the result of travel in the East.
Modern culture tends to affirm two related things about
human beings:
first, that we
are autonomous individuals, belonging to ourselves and accountable only to ourselves; second, that we
are basically good by nature.
The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points:
first, that the Asian values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy,
is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they
are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of
human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in
modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.
We would not
be the
first country to establish a day of awareness of
human trafficking and
modern - day slavery; the United States has already done this.
It
is likely that interbreeding happened already earlier on the way of the
first modern humans through the Levant.
It
is also the
first proof that anatomically
modern humans existed at the same time as Neanderthals in the same geographical area.
One of the most important early Neandertal sites
was discovered in
modern - day Croatia in 1899, when Dragutin Gorjanovic - Kramberger, Director of the Geology and Paleontology Department of the National Museum and Professor of Paleontology and Geology at Zagreb University, alerted by a local schoolteacher,
first visited the Krapina cave and noted cave deposits, including a chipped stone tool, bits of animal bones, and a single
human molar.
Brown suggests that forging tools
was part of a «behavioural tool kit» that allowed the
first modern humans to conquer the world.
Unusually for a
modern military, the Canadian Forces Code of Values and Ethics says it
's more important to respect
human dignity (the
first principle of the code) than it
is to follow orders (its third principle).
«This specimen
is really important and exciting, as — assuming the dating
is correct — it shows for the
first time that
modern humans existed in the Near East at the same time as Neanderthals,» says Katerina Harvati, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany.
THE DNA of ancient viruses
first spotted in the Neanderthal genome has
been identified in
modern humans.
Berger thinks Karabo and an adult female found nearby represent a new hominid species, Australopithecus sediba, that may have
been the
first to walk upright the way
modern humans do.
First of all,
humans, don't get your hopes up to high: a
modern chess
AI could beat your brains out (and Deep Blue's, too).
If he
is right, ▵ F508 dates back to the
first expansion of
modern humans into Europe during the Palaeolithic era.
The fossil record and
modern genetic analysis suggest that
humans and all other living species
are descended from bacteria - like microbes that
first appeared about 4 billion years ago.
This may not
be the
first appearance of the
modern human hand, but we believe that it
is close to the origin, given that we do not see this anatomy in any
human fossils older than 1.8 million years.
In 2004 historian John Coatsworth described globalization as «what happens when the movement of people, goods, or ideas among countries and regions accelerates,» and that process has
been carrying on in one form or another since
modern humans first ventured out of Africa.
Several recent archaeological and fossil discoveries in Asia
are also pushing back the
first appearance of
modern humans in the region and, by implication, the migration out of Africa.
From this study [subscription required], Zollikofer concludes that Neanderthal mothers may have had their
first child, on average, when they
were a year or two older than
modern humans and that their time between pregnancies
was probably longer.
The finding confirms that Neandertals interbred with
modern humans more than once, and it
is the
first evidence that the two types of
humans had a liaison in Europe.
The
first modern humans in Europe
were hunter - gatherers who arrived around 40,000 years ago.
It has
been widely assumed that
modern humans — Homo sapiens —
first traveled out of Africa and settled in central and Western Europe before heading to Eastern Europe.
At
first, White
was convinced that
humans would understand the obvious implications of his ice - core data: The consequences of
human - caused climate change «would basically cripple any kind of
modern society.»
He also
was the
first to describe the camera obscura — a box with a hole in it that captures an image for the purpose of drawing it precisely, a precursor to the
modern camera — as well as examining optical illusions in - depth and the thought processes behind
human visual perception.
This publishing spotlight on the
first prehistoric
human form to
be discovered (back in 1856)
is appropriate, because it touches on the hottest topic in palaeoanthropology: the origin of
modern humans.
WHEN the
first modern humans left Africa they
were ill - equipped to cope with unfamiliar diseases.
But two new papers suggest that they
were at home on both the land and the sea: Studies of ancient and
modern human DNA, including the
first reported ancient DNA from early Middle Eastern farmers, indicate that agriculture spread to Europe via a coastal route, probably by farmers using boats to island hop across the Aegean and Mediterranean seas.
When it comes to
human evolution, Europe and the Near East
are crucial places: Europe has the
first cave art, and the Near East has the
first sightings of
modern humans out of Africa, for example.
Popular discourse now acknowledges that
modern China's
first leader, Mao Zedong, «
was a
human being,» says Zhichang Zhu, a systems scientist at the Xiamen University Malaysia in Sepang.
Now, the view of the ancient genome
is so clear that Meyer and his colleagues
were able to detect for the
first time that Denisovans, like
modern humans, had 23 pairs of chromosomes, rather than 24 pairs, as in chimpanzees.
If this date — the
first proof that a fossil can
be directly dated from its genome — holds up, it
is considerably older than the very rough dates of 30,000 to more than 50,000 years for the layer of sediment where the fossils of Denisovans, Neandertals, and
modern humans all
were found.
The
first time
was at least 80,000 years ago in the Near East, as evidenced by findings of both Neandertal and
modern human bones in caves in Israel.
In 1997, a team of Australian archaeologists, led by the late Mike Morwood,
was on the prowl for evidence of the
first modern humans to arrive on the continent.
And it
's really the
first opportunity that scientists have had to look at the composition of a social group in early
modern humans from that time period.
The structure and function of the auditory system
is very similar in
modern humans and the
first primates, suggesting high evolutionary conservation of auditory perception among species,» says Docent Irma Järvelä, the principal investigator of the study.
First the current thought from Alan Templeton, based on genetic information,
is that Homo spaiens sapiens,
modern humans, left Africa about 135 — 95 kya, with 135 kya most likely, but anytime thereafter, up to 95 kya
is almost as likely.
First of all, note that many of the items in this list
are completely irrelevant to
modern thinking about
human origins (and some of them
were never relevant).
Pontus Skoglund
is not entirely convinced, however, that the genetic journey from Denisovans to
modern humans is as straightforward as it might at
first seem.