Moreover, Western women often do not want children but
a modern man needs a healthy family.
This 3 piece men's facial care set includes face wash, moisturizer and beard oil... all of the things that
a modern man needs for a beautiful mug
It has sometimes been suggested that what
modern man needs is a religion composed of all the best elements of the existing world religions, purged of course of their magical, superstitious and miraculous elements and presented in an ethical form which might win widespread acceptance among men of good will.
The educated
modern man needs no reminder how It has been of the best to «just go along» with the evangelical and his beliefs rather than suffer the wrath that might be so ordained against him by those who have carved out their virtuous beliefs from an age old written scripture.
Not exact matches
Never have we
needed a living,
modern prophet more in the history of
man than we
need one today!
A plethora of books and seminars have been built around treating the Household Codes as God - inspired marriage advice for
modern couples, often working off the statement that «God tells wives to respect their husbands because
men need respect, and God tells husbands to love their wives because women
need love.»
First, its premisses concerning society and
modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that
man has become adult, that he no longer
needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that
man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the
modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about
modern man or present - day society.)
Partly because of a real
need for what technology supplies, more because of artificial wants aroused through a constant, competitive barrage of advertising,
modern man's attention is inevitably focused on the things science produces and money can buy.
For wisdom, we
need to look past the rhetoric of the opportunists to the original ideologues of
modern blackness, and how they defined blackness itself —
men like Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael and Floyd McKissick.
Given the close association of the sexes in
modern working life,
men or women
need to observe delicate respect for the commitments of married colleagues; carelessness here could make them responsible for the collapse of a marriage and the destruction of a family.
Where the dialogue between this newer
modern consciousness and the biblical witness is sensitively pursued, it can yield the kind of critical insight into our understanding of
man which we desperately
need in this age of yearning and conflict.
We
need much thought and practice before we can preach the mystery of the incarnation of the eternal Logos in Jesus of Nazareth in such a way that this message does not sound almost like a myth in which
modern men can no longer believe.
It is alive and not dead and does not
need modern man to distorte it to suite his convenience.
By establishing a metaphoric adaptation of certain aspects of Whitehead's thought, he is able to integrate into his novel the second great
need of
modern man — a viable metaphysics.
Are there discernible principles and ideals which can supply
modern man's
needs for personal and corporate energy and guidance, without surrender to arbitrary authority or retreat into the past?
Thus, individuals and societies
need a system of values by which to live; the nature and pace of
modern cultural transformations have cut
men adrift from the security of established ideals.
Often the ministry seemed to be divided between those who sought to make the gospel relevant by allegorizing it so as to meet the
needs of
modern men and those who regarded its earlier translations as so literal that any new translation was betrayal.
For the opposing position, Buchanan quotes George C. Ball: «The urgent
need of
modern man [is] to use the world's resources in the most efficient manner.
We
need cult christians who do nt abide by the dead, wet noodle, dishwater Christianity of
modern man, we
need BOOK OF ACTS, Christians.
Now let us have a cloose look at
modern man or say Politics Today where you drop all that behind and do as Personal Interests with out any commitment verbal or written Just Buy and Sell at Sale they Trade with the Fate, Faith and destiny of World and New Worlds Nations and that is why no conflict ever settled among nations but getting even worse and Modern Prophets of Inspiration and Knowldge Remind and Warn of World Food and Waters about Famine in the world and the need for working agianst that otherwise nations would become as Live Zombies eating each other
modern man or say Politics Today where you drop all that behind and do as Personal Interests with out any commitment verbal or written Just Buy and Sell at Sale they Trade with the Fate, Faith and destiny of World and New Worlds Nations and that is why no conflict ever settled among nations but getting even worse and
Modern Prophets of Inspiration and Knowldge Remind and Warn of World Food and Waters about Famine in the world and the need for working agianst that otherwise nations would become as Live Zombies eating each other
Modern Prophets of Inspiration and Knowldge Remind and Warn of World Food and Waters about Famine in the world and the
need for working agianst that otherwise nations would become as Live Zombies eating each other flesh.
you really have to dig thru some sh-t to get to the gems,
modern christians who claim the founding fathers on their side should keep this in mind, these
men where largely liberal intellectuals with a practical bent and where not the judeo / christian zealots that some try and make them out to be, jeffersons take on jesus is wonderful and it is useful in the
modern world where we really
need to focus more on the lessons of jesus than THE RULES in the entire bible, as jesus said ABOVE ALL ELSE love neighbor as yourself, jefferson had a great mind and his approach to spiritual matters like this is great
Modern man has taken his cue from the Renaissance and feels that
man is both good and self - sufficient, thus rejecting the Reformation idea that
man is finite, corrupt, and in
need of God's grace.
Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever;
Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of
modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we
need to change.
It is apparent that
modern man for his soul's survival
needs not only faith and hope but love.
Hence, in the pursuit of development, there is a
need for «the deep thought and reflection of wise
men in search of a new humanism which will enable
modern man to find himself anew.»
We mustexpect new developments within genuine and orthodox Catholic theology with the more confidence, because
men so urgently
need a new and a more compelling synthesis of Christian thought and
modern knowledge.
Gee, after 10,000 + years,
modern man has discovered he does not
need God.
«This book is made for
need and profit of all good folk,» writes Caxton in his Less
Modern English introduction, «as far as they in reading or hearing of it shall more understand and feel the foresaid subtle deceits that daily be used in the world, not to the intent that
men should use them, but that every
man should eschew and keep him from the subtle false shrews that they be not deceived.»
This
man needs to put his book back on the shelf and start living with the
modern world.
But if it has any message for
modern man, if it has any place for him to stand and fight against the demoralizing and tyrannizing structures of a culture that has been severed from its true secular responsibility to serve human
need, then those Christians who know this must speak and act.
However, the instructions 1 Timothy 2:8 — «I want
men EVERYWHERE to pray, lifting up holy hands without anger or disputing» (emphasis mine) is taken as a sort of suggestion that
need not be directly enforced in the
modern church.
Now that
modern man is prepared to take the question of God seriously, there is no
need for the preacher to begin by trying to give an existential explanation of the Christian disposition and to disregard everything that might look like myth.
Tolstoy understood something essential that Wagner and Nietzsche did not: that the greatest part of love can survive and surpass even the most intense passion, and that what
modern man most
needs is not sublime myth but living truth.
Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every
man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not
need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and
modern civilization.»
The tendency toward pluralism and the participation of the schools in the confusion of churches and ministers becomes even more apparent in their efforts to add to the traditional core of theological studies new disciplines which are to serve as bridges between the heritage and
modern men, or, more immediately, between it and the
needs of ministers in
modern churches.
That natural theology is possible as well as
needed presupposes that the destructive forces of
modern cosmology are not rooted with any final necessity in the intellectual situation of
modern man.
Wrong, because there is a certain Alexis Sanchez in the Arsenal squad and the Chilean has all the attributes
needed to make a top class front
man in the
modern game, especially with the right players around him to create space and opportunities.
Of course a successful team
needs to do both sides of the game well and that also sums up the role of the
modern full back, so maybe the Arsenal right back Hector Bellerin is the ideal
man to talk about the relative values of attacking and defending.
Remember if you aren't at the head of the class when it comes to the development of young talent, which means eyes on the ground everywhere, a vast array of connections with soccer associations throughout Europe and beyond and a manager willing to properly train and play said blue chippers, (like the 90s Arsenal or clubs like the
modern day Monaco and Dortmund) you
need to spend to win... anything in between is highly problematic... failure to make the necessary changes leaves you in the proverbial «no
man's land» and that is currently where we reside... it's difficult to get out of this rut... just ask either of the Milan teams... next step after that is being known as a «seller», which could be us already if and when Sanchez leaves... there are only two teams that have worn this moniker in recent times and had some decent success and that is Athletico Madrid and Dortmond, which only occurred when they both brought in new, charismatic leaders in Simmone & Klopp... the odds that Wenger could conjure up the magic to repeat the performances of a bygone era are incredibly low, so why prolong the agony... he's not willing to create the hierarchy necessary to go the youth route and he's unwilling to put his team's potential success ahead of his job security by laying it on the line with Moustache, so it's time to place all your chips in the middle or go gently into that good night
No matter what you may think of them, and personally I see the
modern forward as something close to a ballet dancer with father issues, any team with hopes of trophy success
needs at least one star
man up front to put the ball in the back of the net.
Mens Saucony Breeze
Mens Running Shoe Black The brand new Stretch & Go Breeze is sporting
modern, performance materials to handle all of your fitness
needs.
Wenger has all character trades of a
man who believes he doesn't
need any advice and the results are bad... really bad... While teams like Liverpool and Everton are developing under
modern managers, Arsenal has to make up with a guy who still wants to play like it's 2004.
No matter which defenders he has bought all of them make mistake after mistake, and it's not the players it the Wenger philosophy of not having a plan when it comes to defending The
man said a few years back, that the
modern game doesn't
need DMF.
(3) this team is rotting from the inside out and it's going to take some unprecedented moves on the part of this board and the fans to facilitate the necessary changes... this club must rid itself of it's absentee billionaire landlord before we become just another sporting wasteland in this
man's collection of flailing clubs... when this is done it will expose just what exactly has been going on behind the scenes and I'm afraid of what will be uncovered because if Wenger's business model is as antiquated as his football philosophy it could look an awful lot like and old Monty Python sketch in the backroom... we
need to replace the owner with someone who actually cares about this club and isn't afraid to wear their emotions on his or her sleeves or spend their own money to achieve greatness... this new owner
needs to find someone who represents the same sort of cutting edge that Wenger represented in his early years then pair that individual with someone who knows how to conduct transfers in the
modern era... then and only then will we find a way to escape the malaise that has permeated our once storied club for way too many years
Just like the «dating broke
men» article this concept of a «marriageable» partner (
man or woman) based on earning potential illustrates the
need for a change in the definition of what marriage really means in
modern capitalist societies.
As a
modern man and woman
need diapers for their baby, so did Adam and Eve.
«The important thing is to let
men, women and children know that
modern - day slavery exists here in Britain and
needs to be stamped out.
One
man said some school buildings in the district are so defunct that it's impossible for teachers and administrators to safely supervise and protect students, and that the district
needs to build new schools with
modern layouts to help solve its safety problems.
«It would actually be better to say «
modern scientists» than «
modern men and women,»» he wrote, because one
needs schooling in the physicist's style of thought and mathematical techniques to appreciate Einstein's contributions in their fullness.
It is personalized to meet the unique
needs of
modern men.