Sentences with phrase «modern society every person»

In modern society every person wants to find real live, but very often they can not do this because of some reasons: busy schedule, job, personal affairs and so on.

Not exact matches

The survey found that 63 percent of people believe A.I. can «help solve complex problems that plague modern societies.»

that people use absurd creation myths like this to justify prejudices against people in modern society?

Some of the people making comments on that site don't belong in modern society.

The only reason people are knotted up about this issue is because they have an allegiance to ancient fairytales that can't be reconciled with science and modern society.

The entire religion is based on mistakes from people too illiterate to remember the origin of their religion... and even today we see the church evolving on that same path, rewriting and reinterpreting it's rulebook to try and fit a modern society it can never catch up to.

What many do a poor job of stating is that they blame people's excessively fervent beliefs and devotions for causing the various atrocities they have caused throughout history, and the effect that the fundamentalist contingent has on the narrowing of modern societies view.

There are two things about sexuality that most people in today's modern Western secular society don't get: 1.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

It is, however, a mentality that Dawson seeks to capture, and he grounds it historically in the emergence of late medieval / early modern urbanites whose place in society Dawson thinks contributed to a view of persons as isolated individuals, disconnected from the land and from one another.

He spoke of the «genius» of women, of the special gifts they bring, of their necessary skills in «humanising» modern society, in reminding people of their true worth.

religious people such as the owner of this business are permitted to have their opinion on almost any topic; however doesn't make what they say true or acceptible in modern secular society.

In regard to the first objection, I would wish to reply by making clear that I do not intend to suggest that, because modernity has lost the organic integrity of Christianity's moral grammar, every person living in modern society must therefore become heartless, violent, or unprincipled.

Modern ecclesiology, sanctioned by Vatican II, does not start its description of the nature of the Church, like Bellarmin, with its social organization, but with the people of God, the mystical Body of Christ, primarily constituted by the unity of the justified in the Holy Spirit, the community of the redeemed, as distinct from their organization in a «society».

Modern, intelligent people are finally starting to reject the indoctrination from birth by society and are accepting science, logic, and reason instead of archaic myths.

Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison people in attitudes that were suitable enough when science and technology were little dreamt of but which fail to illuminate a society in which, for instance, it is desirable, because of the effects of modern hygiene on death rates, for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third as many infants as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in which war might mean something like the end of the species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war of the past could be.

And again, you have sinful people trying to create interpretations that fit modern society or fit with what makes them comfortable.

Here Kierkegaard is debunking, like Girard, the idea that the desires of the «modern» person are spontaneous and unmediated by society.

facepalm, evolution is not an issue for most people in modern society.

I guess what I am wondering is this: How has the modern society in which I live managed to completely overlook the fact that a sane person and an insane person can believe the very same things concerning the supernatural (God), the improvable (God), the undetectable (God), and yet the sane person will never pause to look at the oddity of their shared beliefs?

Now the dynamism for the struggle for the new society has to come from the people who are victims of the pattern of modern development and who have the nearness to nature and therefore able to protect it and do justice to it.

You used to run into people in the bake shop, the butchers, the candle - stick maker, the church narthex and the women's relief society... So there were plenty of opportunities to discuss all manner of things and to share life, seasons, festivals, deaths... Modern life, suburbia, commuting, everyone working at all hours... has killed much of this face to face life and contact in so many spheres, depending on where you live.

That used to not be such an issue because American society was very modern (as opposed to post modern) and people were used to going to the doctor, going to the movies, using a certain spoon for soup, not wearing white before Labor Day.

First it requires us to find and describe what Tillich called the «boundary situations,» that is, those points where modern men and women reach the limits of their human existence, where they sense they are alienated from society and other people, or feel a lack of personal meaning, or fear being useless and having no worth.2.

The actual problem with Pascal, if I can mirror your discussion with John for a moment, is that people are applying the basic quote out of context of Pensees to modern society.

Its amazing that people who think like you live in modern society.

Are conservative Protestants a bunch of patriarchal Neanderthal men and kitchen - bound, barefoot and pregnant women, or are they people courageously building a wall against the depersonalizing and family - destructive trends of modern societies addicted to efficiency and profit?

Lewis does write with keen insight and clear logic, and shows that much of what modern people chase after in religion, politics, society, and philosophy, is empty and pointless.

It has depersonalized social controls based on family and community ties and has contributed to the continuing negative attitudes that society holds toward homosexuality — the rationalistic and efficiency - oriented character of modern bureaucracies is thought by most of society to be inconsistent with more diffuse forms of sexual expression that homosexuality suggests to many people.

Modern society needs to rediscover the true worth of every person.

Above all, though, Paul VI's concern and care for the family is expressed at length in the Council's Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, which notes that «the well - being of the individual person and of human and Christian society is intimately linked with the healthy condition of that community produced by marriage and family».

Because of the widespread alienation of people from the resources of their unconscious, modern society breeds psychological problems as a swamp breeds mosquitos.

People keep trying to compare atheism in a modern democratic society today with totalitarian regimes of the past.

Not an expression that is acceptable, adaptive, conformed to the modern spirit, but an expression that is true because, on the one hand, it comes to grips with the problems of our society and its people, and, on the other, firmly upholds the reality of the Revelation in its fullness.

Although the problem of the provincial converts, the mawali, was solved by the disappearance of the tribal structure, the problem of the protected persons, the zimmi, has been solved in the Muslim states of modern times simply by deviating from the practice of old Islamic society.

Where ancient and medieval societies tipped the balance toward the common good, modern societies have placed compensating weights — and sometimes more than compensating weights — on the side of the person.

Pentecostalism transforms the individual not only through the experience of belonging to a community and through direct contact with the sacred — experiences which other religions offer that are capable of restoring dignity to an individual, offering him power, courage, and «lawfulness» — but also through experiences that help poor people adapt better to modern society.

I do think people in the modern society need to read this, including myself

Written by Bekley - Organics Allergies are a common problem of our modern society and we evidence a growing trend of more and more people being affected with different allergies.

Written by Alf Fischbein MD (ESPA BioMedical & AB Atoma) Following the sand rat — natural solutions for managing diabetes Diabetes Type 2 is one the major public health problems affecting modern society today, soon expected to affect almost half a billion people worldwide.

The issue of insulting Wenger or any other person is just a symptom of the general decadence in the modern society almost globally.

In our modern and convenience - driven society people forget that.

The way that our society interacts together is a good indicator of the general upbringing that people receive in this modern day, and teaching pro-social behaviors is becoming increasingly important.

It strikes me while I'm reading: this is the reality of modern life for normal people — it's not about lotus birth or kale — it's about using the best our society has to offer and benefiting from the outcomes.

People really want to understand what does it mean to be a man in this modern society.

It's not that I hate the book: it's that it symbolizes the modern evolution of casual citations of Michael Moore movies and easy reliance on simplistic conspiracy theories that I think gives over-educated white people a dose of comfort for the guilt of living in a racist, classist society.

I would agree, it seems to me that employment is likely to lower the chances of poverty and crime, and modern western societies have placed a lot of value on being employed (or working in general, as in being self - employed or even owning and running a business - but most people still work regular old jobs).

Does Mr. Brownback not factor in the fact that most people still need to spend a minimum amount of money to live in modern society (food, shelter, etc.), and it is those people who can not afford to spend more than a minimum that consumption taxes affect the most (which, as you noted, has often been an argument for income tax)?

Obviously this is a pretty broad question, and I don't care if these are primary sources, to collaborative works by modern historians, to historical fictions (as I'm sure much of this detail will be left to the imagination as not much evidence will remain), but I'm looking for how humans ran societies, and the issue they dealt with, on a day to day basis, because people live on a day to day basis, and don't, like historians, summarize a decade in a couple of pages of writing.

To paraphrase R.A. Heinlein, every society in history limited the franchise to some effect - for example, most modern democratic societies restrict franchise from persons underage, or frequently persons convicted of crimes.