Not exact matches
Even the
modern Unitarian, insofar as he or she would make claim to the Christian name whatever may be thought about
theological definitions of Jesus Christ's significance, will say that his or her religion is toward God as God is defined by Jesus Christ — which is to say that the specifically Christian
understanding of God must be in terms of what Whitehead styled «the Galilean vision.
While his account is often sloppy, he is nevertheless right that the transhumanist agenda is a logical consequence of Gnosticism (which he and many others mistake for Christianity), and that this Gnosticism, which has
theological roots in the Scotist - nominalist revolution in metaphysics, ever more exclusively shapes the
modern cultural imagination and our
understanding of what it is to be human.
According to Bultmann, any attempt at the present time to
understand and express the Christian message must realize that the
theological propositions of the New Testament are not
understood by
modern man because they reflect a mythological picture of the world that we today can not share.1
The method increasingly chosen by theologians who wish to
understand anew the interdependence of Christianity and Judaism is to focus on the relationship between Jesus Christ and the Judaism of his day, and then to extrapolate some contemporary
theological challenges for
modern Christians and Jews.
This book is about the major
theological themes in the Book of Revelation and how
modern readers can
understand and apply this difficult book to our lives today.
Harnack set out to show from his penetrating studies of early Christianity that the relevance of Christianity to the
modern world lay not in
theological dogmatism but in the
understanding of Christianity as an historical, changing, evolving process.