Not exact matches
The landmark 1966 Coleman Report highlighted the importance of peer environment along a number of dimensions, but work by Caroline Hoxby and Gretchen Weingarth in 2006 suggests that the share of poor
students has only a
modest effect on achievement once differences in the prior
achievement of
students have been accounted for.
For example, in describing the results of Title I, Jennings concludes, «In a nutshell, the billions of dollars spent
on Title I had at best a modest effect on the academic achievement of the disadvantaged students who participated in the program...» On No Child Left Behind (NCLB), he writes, «So it truly was a mixed ba
on Title I had at best a
modest effect on the academic achievement of the disadvantaged students who participated in the program...» On No Child Left Behind (NCLB), he writes, «So it truly was a mixed ba
on the academic
achievement of the disadvantaged
students who participated in the program...»
On No Child Left Behind (NCLB), he writes, «So it truly was a mixed ba
On No Child Left Behind (NCLB), he writes, «So it truly was a mixed bag.
The research evidence also indicates that certain forms of distributed leadership have a
modest but significant indirect
effect on student achievement (Leithwood & Mascall, 2008:546).
These patterns suggest that increasing exposure to black teachers is beneficial at best and neutral at worst for all
students in terms of discipline, and that increasing teacher diversity while keeping teacher quality constant would have a
modest positive
effect on the reading
achievement of black
students while having an opposite
effect on the math
achievement of white
students.
As the
modest - at - best results of programs like Teach for America suggest, simply unleashing young Ivy Leaguers
on our school system is probably not going to have a dramatic
effect on student achievement.
These results show that even
modest, public pre-K program implemented at scale can have important
effects on students» educational
achievement.
High school graduation rates are at an all - time high at over 80 percent (see Chapter 1:
Student Achievement).7 8 9 Research on NCLB's accountability provisions has shown modest effects on school performance, particularly in schools seeking to avoid a first year of missing AYP or in schools facing the severest penalties.10 Despite this progress, however, high school test scores are flat, achievement gaps persist, and many low - performing schools are not
Achievement).7 8 9 Research
on NCLB's accountability provisions has shown
modest effects on school performance, particularly in schools seeking to avoid a first year of missing AYP or in schools facing the severest penalties.10 Despite this progress, however, high school test scores are flat,
achievement gaps persist, and many low - performing schools are not
achievement gaps persist, and many low - performing schools are not improving.