Sentences with phrase «molecule by molecule»

Yes, molecule by molecule CH4 is 20x stronger than CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

However, due to the dynamic nature of the CO2 cycle all the excess CO2 can not be attributed, molecule by molecule, as a product of fossil fuel burning.

In 1995, McDonough had branched out from his architecture firm, William McDonough + Partners, with studios in Charlottesville, Virginia, and San Francisco, and with Braungart founded McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (M.B.D.C.), a consultancy based in Charlottesville, devoted to Cradle to Cradle — izing the planet, industry by industry, compound by compound, molecule by molecule.

Raspet's art consists of small batches of chemical formulations he's tweaked molecule by molecule to vary slightly in flavor in scent.

The non-toxic product works with enzymes, breaking down stains molecule by molecule.

It is a molecule by molecule duplicate of naturally occurring growth hormone used to replenish a lacking supply in the human body, created in an exact chain in a specific sequence.

Molecule by molecule, the effect of extra carbon dioxide is harmless.

Creating these properties requires scientists to design new materials molecule by molecule.

Instead of slowly adding material molecule by molecule, the coral animal actively constructs large chunks of minerals that it adds to its growing skeleton, helping it grow much faster than it otherwise could, and with greater control.

«Whatever we find at the poles probably built up atom by atom, molecule by molecule, from impacts all over the globe,» he says.

By slowly mapping the cell molecule by molecule, they could piece together a high - resolution picture of the whole thing.

But what if you could buy an exact replica, precisely recreated molecule by molecule, for less money than you likely have in your wallet right now?

Not exact matches

Birds and planes, alike, fight gravity by manipulating the air molecules around them.

By flying a robot through watery plumes, scientists might detect molecules that support life's existence in a subsurface ocean.

More amazingly, we now know that beneath the crust of Enceladus is a global ocean of liquid saltwater and organic molecules, all being heated by hydrothermal vents on the seafloor.

They then sound the alarm by producing small hormone - like molecules called cytokines and chemokines.

What Boger wants is to create a better way to develop drugs: through a process called structure - based design in which scientists build up a new drug, atom by atom, after determining the type of molecule that might interrupt the disease process.

Star Trek's Captain Kirk frequently requested information by addressing the molecules around him: «Computer!»

Scientists are learning to custom - design matter by assembling molecules into microscopic structures such as spheres, tubes, and lattices.

Producing methamphetamine gives off toxic fumes, and Bridger's laser technology, which is still in development, detects these gases by measuring the amount of light absorbed by the gas molecules.

Fission works by taking a heavy molecule such as uranium or plutonium and breaking it by splitting it.

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA — July 25, 2017 — Kezar Life Sciences, a private, clinical - stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel small molecule therapeutics targeting the immunoproteasome and the protein secretion pathway, announced today that it has closed an oversubscribed Series B investment round of $ 50 million led by Cormorant Asset Management and Morningside Venture.

(From «The Moral Molecule» by Paul J. Zak, to be published May 10 by Dutton, a member of Penguin Group (USA).

It is now well known that vast amounts of water and over 120 molecules, including complex organic molecules, are found in interstellar space, having been created by stars and nebulae (the Orion Nebula alone churns out huge amounts of water).

The probability of something as complicated as the DNA molecule being formed by random collisions of atoms in the primeval ocean is incredibly small.

I may just go mingle my molecules with stardust, or get recycled by bugs, or whatever.

The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell.

By abstraction, we can account for certain types of events, but we can no more predict the particular event than a chemist can predict the location of a single molecule in a gas - filled chamber.

Actually, djlockerthebrain if you look at the university scientifically you will realize that the very first molecule was created by something much bigger than you or me because you can't create something out of nothing!.

Some non-mechanical causative principle of order is required to explain, for example, why the molecules of living beings come together into specific shapes, why organisms develop specific characteristics or have the capacity to regulate their metabolism or readjust and reintegrate themselves holistically when injured or when challenged by their environment.

The postulate that life originates purely by chance out of mindless and aimless shuffling of atoms and molecules is all part of our central question here concerning the logic of an emergent view of nature.

Molecular biology, contrary to the article, does not support evolution by natural chance because evolution can not occur without inheritance, inheritance can not occur without DNA and DNA is so complex it could not have evolved by chance unless we are to assume that molecules just happened to arrange themselves into the DNA molecule at the same times as a nucleus formed to hold the DNA, at the same time as the cell membrane just happened to form around it, at the sametime as all the cell maintaining process in the cytoplasm just happened to come into existence to form a single cell and that all these aspects just happened to come together and work harmoniously.

We have wanted a God of self - reliance who needs nothing and nobody, who glorifies Himself by destroying His enemies and forcing every molecule into submission to His will, and who requires that all people worship and adore Him lest they face the torment of His eternal wrath.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Scientific reductionism, however, wants to reduce biology to physics and chemistry, to explain the properties of «life», by thorough specification of the particulars (atoms and molecules) that are integrated into cells and organisms.

Biology can be designated as a science logically distinct from physics and chemistry because its heuristic field is constituted by questions directed toward whole organisms (plants and animals), cells and their «achievements» rather than toward atoms and molecules as such.

Thus, at the lowest level, electrons tend to unite and converge in the atom; atoms converge by molecularization, crystallization; molecules unite by polymerization; cells unite by conjugation, reproduction, association; nerve ganglions concentrate and localize to form a brain by what might be called a process of cephalization; the higher animal groups form colonies, hives, herds, societies, etc.; man socializes and forms civilizations as foci of attraction and organization.

I have tried to show that it is not altogether obvious that the sequence of base pairs in the DNA molecule is determined only by chemistry or that chemistry alone can illuminate this sequence.

For it is demonstrable that our bodies of flesh and blood will be dissolved, and that in whatever mode of existence we may be raised from death it will not be by either the resuscitation of this mortal body or its transformation — unless, indeed, we follow the speculations of some of the Fathers concerning the reassembling, by God, of the dispersed molecules of the flesh, which I am not inclined to do.

The atoms and molecules are in turn constituted by tiny «energy events,» invisible even under the most powerful microscope.

For example, Earley's crystalline structures, by powerful «ionic» forces overwhelm the constituent molecules which virtually lose their identity as their respective ions are held in deadlock.

«3 Whereas John Cobb recalled Whitehead's identification of molecules as «historic routes of actual occasions,» Donald Sherburne prefers the designation as «structured societies» — which leaves open the question of whether both a molecule and its constituent can be «enduring objects» (like a personal society).4 Enthused by Leclerc's reliance upon the Aristotelian distinction between actual and potential, Ford offered an option which might preserve the choice, in Whiteheadian terms.

Now suppose that this molecule is disintegrated by electric forces which do not affect the spin at all and that these atoms start coming apart.

We need to check and see, for example, whether or not the water they're serving at Molecule has been treated by ultraviolet rays, ozone treatments and reverse osmosis via a machine that costs an unimaginable amount of money.

His analysis of the idea of molecular structure from «first principles» shows that if one starts from a description of the molecule as an isolated, dynamical system consisting of the number of electrons and nuclei implied by the stoichiometric formula that interact via electromagnetic forces, one can not even calculate the most important parameters in chemistry, namely, those that describe the molecular structure.8

Again Hartshorne, having conceded that, relatively speaking, molecules are mindless, denies that they (or their constituents) are totally lacking in experience and continues: «the panpsychist... further will not admit that the lower degrees of awareness are due to the dilution of mind by its mixture with increasing doses of another something, matter» (BH 170).

What is not a joke is that an entity at the level of a small to medium size molecule can be significantly influenced by a very small perturbance.

Out of the Gordon Conference on nucleic acids in the summer of 1973 came an open letter to Science; the establishment (in October 1974) by the National Institutes of Health of the Recombinant DNA Molecule Program Advisory Committee; and in February 1975 the now - famous international conference at the Asilomar Conference Center in California, where a reluctant decision was made by scientists to declare a temporary moratorium on certain kinds of DNA research.

Then it follows that molecules are not determined by general physical laws.

And in any such case, it then becomes the interactions which experience has shown will have an impact on the molecule which controls the shape it takes and not anything intrinsic to the molecule considered in itself, or explained simply by the quantum mechanics of its constituents.