Sentences with phrase «monetary policy matters»

Thus whenever monetary policy matters are being discussed at the international level, for example in the IMF executive board (which conducts the Fund's day - to - day business), Eurozone Member States speak about — and decide on — issues without any longer possessing the corresponding powers domestically.

The Government recognises the independence of the Reserve Bank and its responsibility for monetary policy matters and will continue to respect the Reserve Bank's independence as provided by statute.

Not exact matches

Of course no matter if it is NGDP targeting, the Taylor rule, or even a rule that would have the Fed tie itself to gold - the entire debate about rules - based monetary policy ignores the obvious: rules are meant to be broken.

They're addressing issues the Bush administration - and Democrats for that matter — have with China's monetary and trade policies.

First, financial market conditions matter in determining the appropriate stance of monetary policy.

So what matters is how monetary policies or monetary conditions affect the relationship between supply and demand.

Should monetary policy drop its inflation target and instead do whatever it takes to maintain a stable growth path for nominal GDP, no matter what that requires it do, no matter what fiscal policy is?

Additionally, as central banks move toward normalizing monetary policy, the correlations between EM markets are declining and country and stock selection matter more.

Consumers and most countries are tapped out and having to either curtail demand or attempt to create it through unconventional monetary policies (that seem to just be making matters worse).

Whether that means Canada will enjoy below - potential growth or that potential has taken a larger hit than the Bank of Canada currently believes is another matter, but is certainly one of the larger monetary policy questions that remains unanswered, especially with core inflation lingering above 2 percent.

I've long wondered that after four years of unprecedented monetary policy with still very tepid at best economic growth, just whether investors would lose faith in the Fed (and really global central bankers for that matter) and politicians.

The Fed's tendency to favor Treasury and agency securities when conducting monetary policy operations, though innocuous enough when banks hold only minimal excess reserves so that the Fed leaves only a relatively modest «footprint» on overall credit allocation, becomes a serious matter when banks pile - on excess reserves, turning the Fed into the central - bank equivalent of the abominable snowman.

That trend, rather than the published (or «headline») rate which can be affected by «special» factors, is what matters for monetary policy purposes.

J.P. Morgan forecasts suggest any strength in the Aussie will likely prove to be short - lived as what will matter most for the Aussie Dollar are developments around domestic monetary policy, as well as interest rates elsewhere in the world.

The drivers that matter most for a given currency — from interest rate differentials and monetary policy to investment flows and investor sentiment — can change quickly.

Whether we have a central bank or not is a lesser matter, but the current Fed has blown it royally, and is no example for what we should have for monetary policy.

No matter what happens the rest of the year regarding monetary policy, we have already witnessed something this year that had not happened since before the financial crisis: increases in the Fed Funds rate in consecutive quarters.

This is the FOMC that we have today, and the composition of the committee matters when considering how they will execute monetary policy.

As I have said before, it doesn't matter who the next Fed Chairman is, because all of the candidates are basically the same when it comes to monetary policy.