Going indie in genres where the publishers aren't interested (and making more
money as an indie than in trad publishing!)
I make SO much more
money as an indie author, and sales of my self - pubbed version of the book that small press put out are much bigger because I sell at a more attractive price (2.99 compared to 5.50) and I have a better cover (a fun, custom illustration depicting my exact characters rather than a $ 10 stock photo image.)
I made
money as an indie author and it stands to reason that I'll continue that, doesn't it?
The below figures will show that all of this is to say that you don't NEED to make any kind of big list to make
money as an indie author.
But I would like to know how long it will take me to get
that money as an indie publisher, and then keep making more.
Online publications like Jezebel, Buzzfeed, and even The Guardian have written about this «monster porn revolution» — and how it's a great way to make
money as an indie author.
You can check out the free video series here, starting with 11 ways to make
money as an indie author.
I also talk through my long term approach to my publishing career, sharing my year - end numbers from 2016 and the challenges of earning
money as an indie author.
This article isn't about magic marketing techniques or search engine secrets; it's about making a realistic assessment of your potential to make
money as an indie publisher.
With the popularity of How to Make a Living with your Writing and also Business for Authors, I'm starting with some free video training on 11 ways to make
money as an indie author.
Not exact matches
Contrary to popular belief,
indie bands do not make
as much
money as one would think.
Sadly, even though it's clearly yet another ploy for more
money, August is filled with some sincere efforts such
as Ryan Murphy's much - anticipated adaptation of Eat Pray Love, even if it will be overshadowed by the
indie / geek-fest that is Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World.
It's unlikely we see a lot of quality support from major third parties, but if Nintendo wades into the
indie scene a bit, and is willing to put some
money on the table to bring in some quality titles, I'd find it reassuring
as a U owner.
On the same weekend «Sausage Party» broke records and «Suicide Squad» made the most
money at the domestic box office, a Western heist
indie starring Jeff Bridges
as a Texas Ranger is the weekend's top performer.
Traditional publishers aren't scouring the Top 100 lists
as the new slush piles
as much, movie moguls aren't optioning
as many
indie books
as The New Hotness, word has gotten out that you actually have to bring a ladder to reach the boughs of the
money tree.
Wow, you really are out of touch with the publishing industry if you think that
indie authors aren't investing
as much (if not more)
money in getting their work edited, covers designed etc that the larger publishers put into their titles.
Indie authors,
as a rule, get paid very little
money.
How much
money does one have to make publishing books
as an
indie to be «professional» in what they do?
Budget constraints are a reality for
indie publishers
as well, but rather than releasing a bad book, the
indie publisher may shelve the book project until sufficient
money is raised.
An
indie author may self - publish his or her book
as a hobby, or may have the notion that they will make
money as an author.
As soon as indie writers get their collective heads out of the imaginary castle they are defending and start realizing that ALL DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS that a traditional publisher uses for paper books is open to them now, without problem, the indie writer can make a ton more money and sell far, far more book
As soon
as indie writers get their collective heads out of the imaginary castle they are defending and start realizing that ALL DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS that a traditional publisher uses for paper books is open to them now, without problem, the indie writer can make a ton more money and sell far, far more book
as indie writers get their collective heads out of the imaginary castle they are defending and start realizing that ALL DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS that a traditional publisher uses for paper books is open to them now, without problem, the
indie writer can make a ton more
money and sell far, far more books.
Accounting tracking... If you only have a few items
indie published, this turns out to not be much of a problem because,
as you pointed out, the author will get the
money first (I hope... Under Joe Konrath's estributor model, he gives all the
money first to an agent and hopes to get his share.)
And then a few established writers such
as Michael Stackpole and J.A. Konrath started talking to other writers about the
money that can be made
as an
indie publisher, and the control it gives writers.
As more and more writers start to realize the power of
indie publishing and the
money that can be made, the more the split between the two groups of writers will happen.
The collaboration of experts who donated publishing services to raise
money for the families of victims of the Newtown shooting was remarkable,
as was the Indies Unite For Joshua IndieGoGo campaign comprised of
indie authors who came together to raise funds for a fellow writer's son's medical expenses associated with leukemia.
As an
indie publisher, I make more
money and am having more fun.
So true, sometimes I think that Joe Konrad makes it sound
as if we can all make heaps of
money going
Indie and that just isn't true, because we are all different and our books are all different and
as you say we have to work out what's right for us.
Unless
indie authors are willing to spend a lot of
money advertising, their self - published books remain a public secret to their prospective readers not only in bokshops, which are very much still alive, but on the internet
as well.
I still do book signings, my books can be found on the selves of Barnes and Noble, I sold my translation rights, I'm an Amazon Mover and Shaker (twice), I've won awards such
as eFestival of Words AND The Next Generation
Indie Awards, not to mention I have an amazing STREET TEAM of over 350 avid readers, plus I make more
money in one month that I can quit my day job
as a child therapist.....
Because I view all of that
as found
money, and because it highlights that even if you're not madly pursuing a trad deal, good agents still have a valuable role they can play in the mix, even with
indie published books.
And personally, I believe that being an
indie author is like getting a dollar AND a piece of gum from the tooth fairy, because I get the artistic satisfaction of controlling my creation NOW, and the
money as my reader platform grows and I create and sell more books.
Nonetheless, I'm a reader and have been all my life, so publishers
as well
as indie authors get a lot of my fun
money.
As an
Indie author (which really means «self - published» but we say «
Indie» because it sounds WAY cooler, like we're SO artsy we have no use for abstracts like success and
money,) I'm required to work the big room, über - conscious of marketing, promoting, publicizing, advertising, and, ultimately, selling my humble work.
I'm sorry, two days of Kindle sales over a two month period —
as brilliantly crunched
as the data is — doesn't demonstrate that an
indie - published author will make
as much
money as traditionally published author.
As Michael Sullivan says, I also suspect it would show the
money side of the equation strongly favors going
indie.
This is where a lot of authors, myself included, struggle and I appreciate that you acknowledge authors who can't
indie publish, and not always for a lack of will, but lack of
money and building a team that helps things «run themselves»
as you put it in your post above.
I have watched in horror
as indie writers (making great
money) have fallen for this myth by suddenly turning and selling to traditional publishers, even though they would make more
money and get to more readers just by continuing on what they were doing.
Conferences, whether they're in - person or virtual, are highly touted
as leaping - off points for
indie authors to earn more
money and build their businesses.
As an
indie, this is
money you should be putting against a good editor.
Second, after reading a lot of Konrath's posts about the
money end of things, I think there's a better living to be had through going
indie as long
as I can find my audience and promote myself.
As long as a small group of Fans think they are better than the fans who put money into the pockets of authors and artists, as long as they refuse to admit indie published works can be as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
As long
as a small group of Fans think they are better than the fans who put money into the pockets of authors and artists, as long as they refuse to admit indie published works can be as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as a small group of Fans think they are better than the fans who put
money into the pockets of authors and artists,
as long as they refuse to admit indie published works can be as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as long
as they refuse to admit indie published works can be as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as they refuse to admit
indie published works can be
as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as good — or better — than traditionally published works, and
as long as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as long
as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genr
as they refuse to admit that the Hugos were meant to be a fan award, they will continue to disenfranchise most fans of the genre.
I wouldn't have gotten nearly
as far
as I have without the readers who loved Keeper of the Dawn, and I definitely wouldn't have raised the
money so quickly (I've actually been sitting at roughly 90 % funded since last Friday) without the books other
indie authors agreed to donate.
We offer packages
as a way for
indie authors and publishers to get the most value for their
money, but you are in no way under any obligation to purchase more than you feel you need.
Then, when it started hearing from its authors that they were making
as much
money — or more — from their
indie work than they were from their «pro» advances, RWA (Romance Writers of America) changed their requirements for membership.
Indie authors
as a group are earning about
as much
money as the group of authors published by the Big 5.
As an
indie author, you're probably very excited about getting your eBook out there in front of readers, but if you want to see your sales improve, it's worth spending the extra time (and perhaps
money) to do it right.
It makes better sense,
as an
indie author, to invest your
money in you and your readership.
But I look at
indie publishing
as another way to get noticed, while you're learning to ropes and earning
money.
It's hard to make a living
as an
indie at that publishing rate
as well, but the
money, for most authors isn't «great» in traditional publishing.
One of the things that bothers me most about vanity publishing of any stripe — from the old - fashioned vanities that shipped you boxes of books to molder away in your basement, to the print on demand self - publishing services that are trying to re-brand themselves
as «
indie» publishers or «assisted publishing», to the sleazy deceptive pay - to - play companies that pass themselves off
as «real» publishers — is that they take advantage of authors twice: first by taking their
money, second by brainwashing them into believing all the deceptive hype.