Sentences with phrase «money at energy companies»

O'Reilly: It seems to me, Kinder Morgan obviously cut their dividend recently in order to fund their expansion projects because Wall Street definitely is not throwing money at energy companies right now, but I do think the dividend will eventually get reinstated.

Not exact matches

Energy companies frequently «flare» or burn off vast supplies of methane at drilling sites because it earns less money than oil.

The state renewable energy standard requires electric companies to meet emissions targets by investing ratepayer money into programs that green the grid and electrify vehicles and buildings, or else pay into a state fund at the end of the year.

And much of the money for research comes from energy companies, which search for places to drill for oil at shallow sites on the seafloor.

Given the money that was spent by auto and oil companies in the 1970s on advertising about options, and the eventual awakening of the government and other authoritative bodies who began to look carefully at energy, I think we learned how to talk about energy and energy related science by the time the 2nd oil crisis hit, in 1979.

Guess it pays to be the biggest oil company in the world — even though their profits are at the lowest they've been in six years, Exxon still managed to spend more money on lobbying efforts for the climate bill than the entire clean energy industry combined.

«While Americans have rallied in support of clean renewable energy at home, the U.S. Export - Import Bank has made it a priority to handout money to fossil fuel companies to work on projects abroad,» said Kate DeAngelis of Friends of the Earth U.S. «If Trump gets his way, U.S. Export - Import Bank will become a slush fund for Big Oil's plans to accelerate climate change.

Pete McCloskey, The Politician: Development and economic progress has been at the heart of congressmen and there is generally a lot more money from the energy companies than from the developers.

C. Technically, it is still possible to solve the climate problem, but there are two essential requirements: (1) a simple across - the - board (all fossil fuels) rising carbon fee [2] collected from fossil fuel companies at the domestic source (mine or port of entry), not a carbon price «scheme,» and the money must go to the public, not to government coffers, otherwise the public will not allow the fee to rise as needed for phase - over to clean energy, (2) honest government support for, rather than strangulation of, RD&D (research, development and demonstration) of clean energy technologies, including advanced generation, safe nuclear power.

But at the same time energy companies are borrowing more money to drill more wells, the sweet spots are drying up, creating a Catch - 22 as more drilling drives more debt.

Sarah Jackson, an analyst with Synapse Energy Economics Inc. in Cambridge, Mass., said the company's cash flow numbers show that consumers will lose «a great deal of money» in the next few years through the proposed PSR and will not «make that money back up» for at least the next 10 years.

The individual consumer could then use their consumer power and choose whether they are prepared to support (be a customer) with a company which is potentially making most of its money from Fossil fuels or Nuclear but then adds a large amount to invest in renewable energy OR not be associated with companies which deal in fossil fuel based electricity at all: i.e. not supporting = not being part of the problem philosophy — OR any cross-over between the two.

Currently, Obama has done nothing new of note, other than throw a lot of «stimulus» money at «green energy» companies.

But investors haven't exactly been eager to throw their money at ocean energy, considering no company has been able to commercialize energy from the ocean so far.

The individual consumer could then use their consumer power and choose whether they are prepared to support (be a customer) with a company which maybe making most of its money from Fossil fuels or Nuclear but then adds a large amount to invest in renewable energy OR not be associated with companies which deal in fossil fuel based electricity at all: i.e. not supporting = not being part of the problem philosophy — OR any cross-over between the two.

At the launch of this program, former President Bill Clinton pointed out that banks and energy service companies would make money, building owners would save money, and carbon emissions would fall.

A look at his profile page at the University of Durham website reveals that his department is the beneficiary of many # millions of money from renewable energy companies, and the UK government...

Image: Screen grab of Google website Google Crunches the Numbers on Energy Google is a company that tends to put its money where its mouth is: They invested around half a billion dollars in various clean energy projects, some at the commEnergy Google is a company that tends to put its money where its mouth is: They invested around half a billion dollars in various clean energy projects, some at the commenergy projects, some at the commercial

Seeing so many companies - major companies at that - hopping onboard with accessible tools like this is encouraging, since it means global climate change will be directly helped by companies that are actively conserving energy while saving money and prospering.

When I was Codex at Stanford last year, AI was obviously a hot topic but I heard from some of the companies involved that it's hard to recruit talented engineers to work on AI because law is not sexy and there's not a lot of investment money flowing into... There are some success stories but there isn't a ton of venture capital flowing into the legal startups and so there's an obstacle there that there just isn't a whole lot of energy being put towards it.

on the other hand i use the cheaper tuff led bulbs, they are brighter than those big expensive companies at half the price and also surprisingly more reliable since i use their energy savers working since 2006... the difference on your electric bills wont be noticable since most ppl use energy savers and replacing them does nt save alot, these giant companies are just eating our money the new way.

Summary High - energy Printer Technician successful at saving companies money by refurbishing a...