Sentences with phrase «money comes at a cost»

However, with a typical 401 (k), the access to your money comes at a cost.

You know that borrowing money comes at a cost, but what are all of the line items that make up the total?

Not exact matches

Turner: One of the things that people in the industry often talk about when it comes to money management is this barbell, where as you said you have low - cost, passive index tracking funds and at the other end you have higher fees, higher active share, things like private debt which you mentioned, and it's those in the middle that are charging higher fees for something that looks quite a lot like beta that are really going to struggle.

For example, four years into the business, Koch took his first outside money to build an $ 8 million brewery, which he was then forced to abandon — eating almost the whole $ 3 million cost of equipment — when bids came back at $ 15 million.

Their pursuit of money, status and professional success from an early age often comes at the cost of their personal relationships.

Since then, commodities trading has come under pressure at big banks as funding costs have risen and regulators have clamped on their ability to make bets with their own money.

Also in terms of marketing — it comes at a cost, so it matters incredibly what channels you put your resources into as all the channels out there have different strengths and purposes... misuse is watsed money — no ROI.

If someone had the gut to speak to him and tell him he's pass his glory days and just do us the honor and retire at the end of the season but I guess they are too scared to take the risk of loosing their precious money by not making top four... they should bring in young coaches with fresh ideas, we never can know until we try, if it doesn't work out we keep trying till we find the right one, winning doesn't come easy, it has its own cost.

Now the latest figures to come out are showing how much money it costs the club for each goal scored by our strikers, which obviously varies according to the weekly wage each player is on at the moment.

but I do think issues will come up both with these ppv numbers (however big the issue is yet to be seen) and there will be some issues with sponsors especially now in this WME era as they are trying to make it even more mainstream acceptable, look at how sensitive certain things are with FOX so I think it's fair for them to suggest it will cost them money.

Yes the new stadium came at the cost of winning less trophies but you can't have it all, Man Utd won lots of trophies over the last twenty years but don't have a new stadium, Man City won the league twice but did not build a new stadium with their own money and now they rent a stadium, Chelsea have won a few trophies and are just now starting to build a new stadium but the team and the new ground are all funded Abramovich's money and not the club's.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

no need for that Call me an idiot or what ever but never insult me by calling me a spud Red runs through my veins and has for over 40plus years I want the change and want it now but never at the cost of losing which we have far to often As I have said many a time it needs the board to make the change and the time us coming Even they have come to realise AW makes money for them but that's not enough now Never call me a spud again..

Selling a few key players every year could easily be seen as one of Kroenke's ways of making good money out of our club, but he also knows that this could come at a high cost to Arsenal and therefore to himself.

For our defesive problems wenger has Jorou to look at as a longer term replacemnet for gallas and he has the height.He is a shrewed businessman who is not going to buy even next season.Once Chamack comes in free, almost all departments wil be covered with quality and the only signing i can see him signing at a cost is may be a cover up for Song.But there is no way he is going to spend money buying players again as he has more than enough.Am seeing him buy a keeper but i do nt know which one.I have a sleem hope that next season is ours for the taking and i pray we do nt go through these stupid champions league qualifiers at the expense of Liverpool.It will be an improvement for us from last season.

Sometimes learning curves comes at a cost and we have wasted money on toys that never got used!

Caring for old people costs money, which can be hard to come by when there is a shortage of people at working age.

In January 2017, the issue of mobile money interoperability came to the fore when telecom operators kicked against moves by the central bank to impose a third - party company to implement the interoperability at a cost of GHc4.6 billion.

In January 2017, the issue of mobile money interoperability came to the fore when telecom operators kicked against moves by the central bank to impose a third - party company to implement the interoperability at the cost of GHc4.6 billion.

This week I came across an article on Bloomberg, which confirms it once again: International dating saves you money, if you look at the actual costs of meeting and courting women, and then the expenses of a wedding.

With oil comes a lot of money but at what cost?

The event comes as it was found by Money Advice Service that at least 18.5 million working age adults have «poor or low» numeracy levels, and economist reported that poor numeracy costs the UK up to # 20.2 billion a year.

Looking at his raised eyebrows, I dug deeper: «Besides, one third of state and local expenditure is for education, and all the money going into pensions and medical care for retired superintendents is coming at the cost of today's students.»

But this will all come at a cost, as Van Roekel noted during his EWA remarks, «If you're not willing to invest more money into the compensation system, it's a really difficult challenge to find a different way of paying [teachers].»

Since 2008 doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the current paint was done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised» at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required at cost price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;

They sure want their money up front, but when it comes to them paying you, they ignore you at all costs.

While most Chromebooks are already going to come priced at a decent amount, being able to save any additional money is always a good thing, and right now you can pick up an ASUS C200MA Chromebook for just $ 179.99 down from its original cost of $ 219.00.

And come to think of it, why should a book cost a lot of money to produce at all?

They generally come at a cost as well, so you end up shelling out a little money with each carrier you use.

The perk of earning money on books that would otherwise be free to the reader isn't a new concept, but it has always come at a cost for authors, namely exclusivity.

The SIM only monthly contract comes in at the reported lowest cost of any tariff in the UK, where the unlimited text messaging will certainly be an attractive proposition for the younger generation along with the value for money

One could argue that trying to charge a little extra and make more profit is more trouble than it's worth for Google or Apple (or even profit - hungry Amazon)-- better to offer it at cost or thereabouts to enhance the value of the broader platform, which is where the real money comes from (advertising and devices respectively).

However, doing so will come at a cost to your ability to borrow money.

Doing so might be able to save you a lot of money on interest, depending on the terms of your original loan, but comes at a cost.

A personal line of credit offers flexibility when you're not sure exactly how much money you need to borrow, but that flexibility can come at a cost.

Millennials in need of budgeting tips get access to FinanceWorks money management software, which comes at no cost with a High - Yield Savings account.

Usually, you can «wire» transfer money from your BoA account to the account back home, but that is usually comes at a fee of about $ 30 - $ 50 per transfer (in the US, additional fees may be charged at the receiving end + currency conversion costs).

Considering the reckless usage of deposits and other public monies to build buildings just to claim that gdp is high (they count the cost of real estate as investment not their final sales as the rest of the world does), all depositors in Chinese banks stand to lose or at least have their funds frozen (since all credit funding the real estate building comes from the banks and taxes & land seizures to a lesser degree).

As mentioned earlier, this professional expertise of managing your money to invest and trade in securities comes at a cost.

Carlos Sera presents A Tale of Two Titans; Financial Tales posted at Financial Tales, saying, «Dollar Cost Averaging and Asset Allocation: A question that always comes up, regardless of age, is how do I allocate my money once I start a savings program?

But that debt comes at a cost and it's always worth evaluating all of your options, from saving the money you need yourself to exploring other types of loans.

No matter how you look at it, the cost of ownership for American Funds is about as high as it gets - when it comes to the money that goes to people that don't have anything to do with getting better investment performance (the actual fund managers).

These may seem like free money, but credit cards come at a high cost if misused.

I don't think I could in good conscience adopt another family member from Pets Alive without making some effort at donating money towards the costs they bore keeping him or her alive and healthy while they waited for their forever home — it's an individual choice obviously, but at the same time Pets Alive is such an amazing organization that hopefully adopters will come back and donate their time, money and items needed in order to make up the difference.

Another concern, at least when it comes to frozen raw diets, are freezers, which take up space and cost money.

If the fee is more than $ 50 a year, and there are no benefits that come with that cost (such as cash rewards or travel points) then take a second look at other cards and save yourself a little money.

As you can see from the table above, the Category 1 and Category 7 hotels are clearly the worst value for money when it comes to cash and point redemptions (at a cost of $ 0.02 / point) while the other properties are reasonably similar in cost ($ 0.012 — $ 0.014 / point).

We also love how Egyptian holidays rank constantly at the best value for money cheap holidays, with large resort style hotels with extensive restaurants and water parks coming in at a much lower cost than their western European counterparts.

While Magic 2015 does widen the customisation of decks it comes at a great cost the game is littered with micro transactions which seem to be aggressively marketed at the player to encourage them to spend more money than the standard purchase price.

Eliminating law reviews may save money, but does it come at the cost of saving the profession's scholarship and history?