Sentences with phrase «money contract which»
Wrap paperwork begins with the earnest money contract which should include an addendum setting forth the terms of the wrap.
http://www.lonestarlandlaw.com/ Not exact matches
There are fewer problems in the first place, because online applications — which make their money from subscriptions, not support contracts — tend to have modern, easy - to - use interfaces.
This strategy — which involves selling an out - of - the - money put contract and buying an out - of - the - money call — is designed to profit from a large increase in a stock.
Islam speculates that contracts for which Zantech once competed are flowing to large firms, which have greater name recognition and economies of scale and can do the work for less money.
It has been reported that Harvey Weinstein had a contract drawn up in which the board of his film company could not terminate his employment if he paid off women accusing him of sexual harassment with his own money.
... They figured they'd just keep raising money and paying back the ones with the money they'd been using,» Steven Butt, president of brokerage and property management firm Avenue Commercial, which sold a building to Concrete and continued to manage it under contract.
The typical CD contract only calls for a 90 - day interest penalty — which means if you withdraw the money before the predetermined date, you'll have to pay a penalty of 90 days interest.
Skeptical analysts have homed in on increases for accounting purposes regarding money related to contract work Logica has completed but for which it has not yet submitted bills - so - called deferred revenue.
It has an annual annuity charge of just 0.25 % (0.10 % for contracts purchased with an initial investment of $ 1 million or more4), which means more of your money goes to helping you reach your investment goals.
In COMEX silver, there was net commercial selling of nearly 24,400 contracts which is the equivalent of 122 million ounces and managed money net buying of more than 28,200 contracts, which is the equivalent of 141 million ounces.
It gives dignified and human terms with which to analyse such economic tools as money, property, contracts, inheritance, taxation, labour skills, capital and environmental responsibility.
When I was invited to a Mennonite college to speak on peace and simple living (neither of which is Caesar's favorite topic), I had to sign a formal, legal contract — because my honorarium was to come out of federal grant money.
Delegates in Dallas were already discussing an issue yet to be resolved: how to divvy up money from the NCAA's new seven - year, $ 1 billion contract with CBS, which is based largely on the NCAA basketball tournament.
Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clWhich at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clwhich they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clwhich they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.
His comments also come at a time when Toby Alderweireld has been linked with a move to Inter, which could be countered by a big - money new contract from Spurs, as noted by The Mirror, while The Telegraph claim that Kyle Walker will reassess his future at the club this summer with reported interest from both Manchester clubs.
Considering that the most money Joe ever had at one time before he signed the Jet contract was $ 600, which he got for peddling some Alabama game tickets, he might have been justified in blowing the whole stack on a car, a blonde and a diamond ring.
The Red Sox still owe Pablo Sandoval just shy of $ 50 million, which, according to Jon Morosi's calculations, is the second-most dead money ever left on an MLB deal after Josh Hamilton's Angels contract.
The fact was, the sticking point was contract length, not money, which is what you said.
Their contract with Emirates is worth # 30m a year, which could be the difference to competitors in the Premier League, such as West Ham, who are also flushed with cash due to the money received from Sky and BT and a move to the Olympic Stadium.
We sold a rubbish player, with only a year left on his contract, for a whopping # 40 million when the Ox left, which gives you a really good insight into how much money we're missing out on by refusing to sell.
Michigan's new apparel deal with Nike, which is the biggest apparel contract in the nation, is for quite a bit of money.
I do have my doubts about this rumour, like all of them, especially when you see the money being talked about as nearly # 50 million, but Manolas is one of the top rated defenders in the world and if the price was a little bit less which it could well be as the contract situation with his current club is said to be the reason for the move, then maybe it could happen.
Notably, Eddie D. not only paid the money remaining on his contract (which he was not obligated to do), he also set up an annuity that paid Fuller $ 100K / yr for the rest of his life.
When in the NBA, a player with a two - way contract will accrue a day of service and make money consistent with an NBA rookie minimum, which is about $ 816,000 next season.
I hope I'm wrong but this could be the most damaging win when it comes to transfers... winning 1 game, after about 20 minutes of really good play, is of little consequence in the grand scheme of things... only those with the most selfish of intentions would suggest otherwise... the only reason we're even in this predicament, where were celebrating our first victory of 2018 against a bottom half squad who is managed by possibly the only individual more antiquated than our manager, is because of Wenger's ridiculous mishandling of his contract last year combined with his mishandling of the contracts of our top players this year; a fact that he himself admitted to... so before you get too excited about the possibilities of our current roster don't forget what has happened over the last several years and pray to the gods of football that real quality reinforcements like Auba are on the way, which could have happened years ago for less money and we might have been holding a trophy of some significance, or this brief respite will be followed by the usual mediocrity and stagnation
Arsene Wenger has consistently said that he will make them honour their contracts until next summer, but there is a very large amount of money at stake here which could be used to buy suitable replacements so is it really sensible to let them leave for free next year?
He lost all the respect we have for him and his refusal to step down means he has no love for the club and all he cares is money which is the reason he wants to run down his contract always...
We are heading down the same path as Liverpool, spending money on wrong players, with the wrong manager, wrong contract extensions which means that when Arsene goes the new manager's hands will be tie.
They were going to subsidize the huge contracts for veteran players with the newfound rights of free agency, but baseball was going to have more competitive balance, which is better for the sport and brings more money in, which starts the whole cycle over again.
He abhors spending large sums of money on players as he believes he can find cheaper «no name» players and turn them into stars which is why we end up with all these average players on long lucrative contracts and find it hard to get rid of them.
We could have said the same thing about Wilshere 12 months ago but look how he got sent out on loan to prove himself again which kinda failed... Giving him a new contract could just be a way to ensure as much money from his sale and there has been rumors of him being sold.
Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years
If Cowherd was going to shill for any conference in particular, my money would be on the B1G, which may or may not have any baring on Fox Sports» recent lucrative contract with said conference.
Instead we reward under performers (players, managers) with improved contracts which means money overload.
PROPOSED: A series of 20 INTERNATIONAL TENNIS MATCHES beginning next February in which 32 selected contract and independent players would compete for $ 1 million in prize money, culminating in a tournament for the top eight qualifiers in which the winner would receive $ 50,000; by World Championship Tennis of Dallas.
The average annual value is «just» $ 25 million, which for luxury tax purposes isn't extraordinary, but again, it's a deal for a player who could very well already be under contract for the entire rest of his MLB career, so the money we're talking about here is unheard of.
A final factor damming up the negotiations — as of Sunday, the three Soviet athletes were unsigned — is internal Soviet wrangling over which agency gets what percentage of the players» contract money.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise
It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?
The 1963 NCAA title game between Loyola of Chicago and Cincinnati was surely one of the most memorable in tournament history: It was the last title game to be decided in overtime; the last one before UCLA began its intimidating reign of 10 championships, including seven in a row, over the next 12 years; the first one to be played under a lucrative new six - year television contract that launched college basketball into the big - money era; and, most significantly, the first in which the majority of players on both sides were black — or, as most of the nation was still saying back in March of 1963, Negro.
If he doesn't accept the generous contract offer that we offer him, which will make him a very rich man, and just signs for someone else for more money then he obviously doesn't want to play for us and will be thought of as just another mercenary player like RVP, Nasri, Hleb etc. I'm sure that what we offer him will be very good and the stalling to sign is just his agent angling for the highest offer so that his cut will be more.
The only thing that could happen is for that «fool» to walk away, which he will never do (he does love money, that is a fact too... That is why his contract with TF1 was not renewed because he had the «balls» to ask for a wage increase... Greedy f*cker!!).
However, his agent has hinted that the Premier League is still on the agenda for Turan, whose signing of a new contract has seen his buy - 0ut clause with the club rise to over # 30m, which may be a ploy simply to make more money out of his sale if top English clubs come calling for the Turkish international again.
«Bertrand signed a new five - year contract with Southampton last summer, which means City would have to pay big money to get him and there is no prospect of him moving this month.
The 23 - year - old Germany international has always insisted that the delays do not relate to money and that he's not looking to run his contract down which expires next year.
But it remains to be seen how long he will remain at Everton — with his current contract due to expire in the summer, meaning the January window is the last one in which The Toffees could get money for him, as he can leave for free in the summer.
Ferguson was calling attention to city contracts that included a little known «public benefit clause,» which required companies that win contracts with City Hall to donate money to a charity.
The man, who is suspected to have leveraged his relationship with government to get the deal in which the government of Ghana lends him money to enable him do supplies to Cocobod, is reported to have claimed in a radio interview that he does not have a supply contract with Cocobod.
The Court upheld arguments by Mr. Martin Amidu that the contracts which formed the basis for Woyome's claims against the state and for which he was paid the money, were unconstitutional for lack of Parliamentary approval.