In 2004, voters repealed a charter school law after a hard - fought campaign financed largely by the statewide teacher's union, which argued that charters would siphon
money from other public schools.
The AFL - CIO railed that the bill creates a «dangerous escalation of the charter - school program» and drains
money from other public schools.
Not exact matches
And Protestants possessed a sense of unity as well, mostly when confronted by Catholics seeking
public money for parochial
schools or Jews seeking to oust Bible readings
from public schools and
other practices that seemed to cross the church - state line.
At our state conference last month, we overwhelmingly passed resolutions supporting guaranteed healthcare as a human right, free
public education
from pre-K through college or trade
school, a living wage and fair compensation for all, investments in environmental protection and renewable energy, restoration of voting rights to former felons,
public financing of elections to eradicate the corrupting influence of big
money in politics, and
other policies that serve the people.
Deutsch says it takes
money away
from other state needs, like funding
public schools.
Although some progress had been made since the horrors of unhealthy
school lunches had been made
public by folks like celebrity chef Jamie Oliver, interest in hot lunch had plummeted to a dismal 43 percent of students, with
schools losing
money and making up costs
from other parts of the budget.
That amounts to $ 6,439 per student this year, or about $ 2,000 less, on average, than at
other Nevada
public schools, which receive
money from federal poverty and special - education programs.
While they're funded with
public money, they generally operate outside of collective bargaining agreements (only about one - tenth of charter
schools are unionized) and
other constraints that often prevent principals in
public schools from innovating for the good of their students (so the argument goes).
• Denver
Public Schools, by comparison, spent 13 percent of its turnaround grant
money so far on consulting and
other help
from private companies.
The plaintiffs» amended complaint contends the
school choice programs, among
other programs, unconstitutionally «divert»
money from Florida's
public schools.
Critics of charter
schools say, among
other complaints, that they drain
money from regular
public schools, skim talented students and nudge out disruptive ones.
The state teachers union and
others oppose them because they hire nonunion employees and divert
money from traditional
public schools.
The trend of increasing racial and economic segregation is a nationwide trend — not just in Alabama and
other Southern states.55 The South, however, was the only region in the country to see a net increase in private
school enrollment between 1960 and 2000, and where private
school enrollment is higher, support for spending in
public schools tends to be lower.56 A growing body of rigorous research shows that
money absolutely matters for
public schools, especially for the students
from low - income families who attend them.57 What's more, private
schools in the South tend to have the largest overrepresentation of white students.58 In fact, research has shown that the strongest predictor of white private
school enrollment is the proportion of black students in the local
public schools.59
A major criticism by Hasse and
others is that charter
schools will drain sorely needed
money from regular
public schools, on the order of $ 75.5 million statewide over the next four years, based on projections by the state Office of Financial Management.
Charter
schools draw fire
from teachers» unions and
other education groups, who say taxpayer
money should be spent to fix traditional
public education system rather than creating
schools that have less oversight
from state and local officials.
In the past, a majority of voters have sided with charter opponents, who have argued charters haven't proved to be better than
other public schools, would drain
money from them and leave them with the harder - to - educate kids.
Moreover, advocates should keep in mind that
school districts in participating states access Medicaid dollars directly to pay for medically necessary services for students with disabilities.70 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires that districts provide all necessary services and resources to afford every child a «free appropriate
public education,» and some medically related supports qualify for Medicaid reimbursement.71 With less Medicaid funding statewide to meet that guarantee, states and districts would have to siphon
money from other education funding streams to afford necessary medical services that support the learning of students with disabilities.
How much more do we take away
from our
public school systems that are already in trouble with funding because of the promised Lotto
money which was just superseded by cuts in
other places in the
school budget.
But
other factors suggest vouchers pull
money from public schools.
Much of the blame for the disaster in our nation's
public schools today can be traced to the Walton family's wealth, which in turn comes
from the
money people spend in their stores on
school supplies and
other items.
Unless North Carolina requires the same level of accountability and transparency
from the private and religious
schools that receive vouchers as it requires
from other schools that receive
public money, it is making education policy on hunches and ideology rather than real data.
Kelley ruled in a lawsuit backed by teacher unions and
school boards seeking to shut down the voucher program and
other changes that would funnel more
money away
from traditional
public schools.
The increase in state funding would not take
money away
from other public school students, he said, because it would not come out of the $ 9 billion state education budget dictated by the
school funding formula.
Another argument I've heard, that Charter
Schools take money away from other public schools, is counter to my belief that the money should follow the s
Schools take
money away
from other public schools, is counter to my belief that the money should follow the s
schools, is counter to my belief that the
money should follow the student.
If you bank with Webster Bank, Bank of America or any of the
other corporations that are pushing Governor Dannel Malloy's corporate education reform industry agenda, the next time you go to the bank, speak with your insurance company or communicate with one of CCER's funders, ask them why they are using the
money that they take
from us to undermine our
public schools and label our children as failures.
Without the benefit of any
public hearing, S.B. 2 would overturn decades of giving priority to funding of neighborhood
public schools by adopting the «
money follows the child» concept which shifts taxpayer
money away
from traditional
public schools to charter
schools without requiring these charter
schools to meet the same accountability standards as
other public schools.
The resolution cited the fact that charter boards accept
public money but lack democratic accountability, that charter
schools are contributing to increased segregation, that punitive disciplinary policies are disproportionately used in charter
schools as well as
other practices that violate students» rights, that there is a pattern of fraud of mismanagement in the sector in general, and it then called for opposition to privatization of education, opposed diversion of funding
from public schools, called for full funding for quality
public education, called for legislation granting parents access to charter
school boards and to strengthen oversight, called for charter
schools to follow USDOJ and USDOE guidelines on student discipline and to help parents file complaints when those guidelines are violated, opposed efforts to weaken oversight, and called for a moratorium on charter
school growth.
The
other [concern] is they basically drain
money from traditional
public schools.»
This move should signal that he is not interested in providing adequate resources to
public schools, but rather intends to shift
money away
from public schools to
other «choice»
schools, such as charters.
SB 2 would create a new and costly government entitlement program that removes taxpayer dollars
from public schools and gives this
money to families to spend on private / religious
school tuition, college savings, tutors, supplies, and
other educational expenses.
She has worked statewide to stop special needs and
other types of private vouchers that take
money away
from public education and give to private
schools with no requirements for accountability.
The good news is that the state has recognized the problem and has found some
money to move forward with a plan to retrofit
public schools and
other important
public buildings (thanks to Yumei Wang
from the state's geohazards group for the alert on this).
To counter criticism of the business community
from college campuses, business organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce should support scholars who will defend the free enterprise system, develop speakers and support speakers» bureaus that will counter the liberal rhetoric coming
from college campuses, subject textbooks to ideological review, insist on equal time for speakers exposing the views of the business community for speakers on campuses, insist that college faculties be balanced by those who will defend the free enterprise system, request that graduate
schools of business include courses that support the free enterprise system, encourage local chambers of commerce to provide the views of the business community in high
schools, establish staff who work with the media to communicate to the general
public the views of the business community, monitor and criticize television programs that unfairly criticize the free enterprise system and where appropriate file complaints with the Federal Communications Commission, monitor radio and
other media and pressure them to cover the views of defenders of the free enterprise system, support scholars who support the free enterprise system to publish in scholarly journals, establish incentives for scholars to publish defenses of free enterprise in books, papers, and pamphlets, spend more
money on advertising that expressly supports the free market system.
Peabody Energy return the $ 61 million in recent tax breaks to the city, especially $ 2 million
from the St. Louis
Public Schools system, so that
money can fund education and
other social services