Sentences with phrase «money if you break»

Not exact matches

Physically didn't have the money to break up with her, if that makes sense.

You can also register your locks with the manufacturer so that if they do get broken into (no lock will stop a truly determined thief), and they'll reimburse you some money for your loss as a way to stand behind their product.

If you're a high earner, you may have the ability to save a lot of money but not know the right way to prioritize things and take advantage of the various tax breaks available to you.

It's pretty clear, he argues that if you can't fairly rapidly achieve mass consumer pricing, your EON (Economy of Now) business on its best days will be a niche nicety for the folks with more money than time or brains and never break out of that box.

«You want to make money, but if you just break even and generate enough buzz to attract buyers, that's a win,» he says.

I felt like if I took that bigger job, there would be no way I could break away from that money train.

If I borrowed money at 18 or 20 percent, I'd be broke.»

If you think about the next five years, it's going to get harder and harder to make money in transactional businesses, so you've got to figure out some way to break out of that.

If you're not sure where the best place to put your money is, we've broken down five checking account alternatives that are worth considering:

If money is needed before then, the CDs can be broken for a small penalty,» Pressman said.

What if the comment was about being broke and the guy wants to make money off of it?

«I've never seen a company go broke if they have monies in the bank,» Mr. Stronach said Wednesday in the homily he offers annually at shareholder meetings of the auto parts giant he founded more than 50 years ago.

Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping By and Get Your Financial Life Together by Erin Lowry Make Your Kid A Money Genius (Even If You're Not): A Parents» Guide for Kids 3 to 23 by Beth Kobliner Set for Life: Dominate Life, Money, and the American Dream by Scott Trench The Simple Path to Wealth: Your road map to financial independence and a rich, free life by JL Collins Your Playbook For Tough Times, Vol.

But if you aren't putting money toward other goals, you might have to take on more debt to buy a house or buy a new car when your old one breaks down.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

So if I broke even, I lost money.

If you're refinancing primarily to save money, you'll want to calculate your «break - even point.»

That way, if you need to take care of a car repair, fix a broken window, and get an emergency root canal all in the same month, you will still have some emergency money to fall back on just in case something else goes wrong.

So if pass - through money overwhelmingly goes to the rich, and giving it a tax break opens up a loophole for rich individuals, why in the world are Republicans trying to do it?

If banking is broken, more money might flow into the so - called shadow banking system, or into peer - to - peer lending.

Every time a bitcoin transaction is made, the network «breaks» the total amount as if it was paper money, issuing back bitcoins in a way that makes the data behave similarly to physical coins or change.

And if Harvard and Yale continue to get tax breaks, then why shouldn't Congress be able to regulate how they use that money?

If Jesus embodies God's dreams for the world, then citizens of the Kingdom start by imitating him — by eating with the people he ate with, by telling the sort of stories he told, by healing and forgiving, by serving and praying, by resisting the temptations of power and money and violence, by breaking down religious barriers, by loving enemies, by showing humility and grace, by overturning some tables and dining at others, by being obedient to the point of death.

Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»

If the only reason you give money is to get a tax break you are losing big time.

Sending emails, tweets, posting selfies, making donations, sending money, praying, lighting candles, reading all the news stories even if they break my heart, all of it.

«If only the victims had given the extortionist the money he demanded, they wouldn't have had their kneecaps broken.»

Finally, the boy broke in with a suggestion: «If you need money, why don't you just write one of those little pieces of paper?»

maybe if Perry didn't give tax cuts / breaks for the rich and gave away all that money to those that helpled him get elected and used all that extra revenue he would have had to use in funding to bring in water from other states and for funding local fire and rescue departments.

Antonio is unmoved by Shylock's indignant response to such humiliations and tells him to lend the money «to thine enemy, / Who if he break, thou mayst with better face / Exact the penalty.»

So you are telling me that Medicaid and Medicare hasnt made people not wan na get out of it??? People are earnestly trying to not need the governments help??? These two organizations are examples of how are country became a nation of dependents... If i do nt have money... its ok... ill use the government to provide me a check to make all my pains go away... oh and btw... i can use that to get my lottery... win it... and still i can use the government for my health care... The system is flawed... deeply broken...

If you believe that all the money in the game means that there will always be ways of bending and breaking the rules then I guess the FFP thing was never going to work and when you see what has happened this week in the transfer market, with PSG paying something like # 200 million to sign Neymar from FC Barcelona then you could say that anything is possible.

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

If he had moved to Arsenal he would have had to be extremely special to break into the first team with Monreal and Gibbs as competition, but instead he has played a full season with a team that has gone unbeaten in the League all season (if they don't lose this weekend) instead of earning more money playing for the Under - 23's at ArsenaIf he had moved to Arsenal he would have had to be extremely special to break into the first team with Monreal and Gibbs as competition, but instead he has played a full season with a team that has gone unbeaten in the League all season (if they don't lose this weekend) instead of earning more money playing for the Under - 23's at Arsenaif they don't lose this weekend) instead of earning more money playing for the Under - 23's at Arsenal.

its Money cause if it was trophy's it have be Man City my guess I think pep don't like how Sanchez is acting if I was Man City fan I wouldn't want him I use love Sanchez but he's true colors are showing arsenal have try offer nice package now I think he's been bit greedy with everything but who can blame him we're shambles from top too bottom I don't care where he goes I don't care we're ozil goes and by looking at lacasette he looks like he wants out as promises have been broke he came play with Sanchez and ozil and he gets welbeck and iwobi not fair really, I just want wenger gone because them players are not playing for him a lot is not rite and we as fans are paying for it but I don't care anymore don't care who leaves who comes in club is dead watch Liverpool yesterday boy was I envy ahwell let's see what happens

President Trump has urged his top overseas business owners to bring back the money to USA with tax breaks, perfect time to sell we better all check to see if we have lose coins back of the sofa

i loved the controversy days on these site especially the 2013 transfer period... if you are a new - by, then damn you missed what i would call «a revolution «that shaped arsenal... we the #WOB are the ones responsible for the panic buy of ozil which led to the breaking of the top money ever paid for a player and that has seen these club change the way they approached transfers....

My personal choice would be Lemar, but according to the rumours the French title winners are asking for crazy money to let the 21 year - old leave, in fact it would yet another Arsenal transfer record broken if it happens, but Arsenal are still a very short price to nab him.

If Wenger went shopping for a Rolls Royce but only offered enough money to buy a clapped out Morris Minor, he would take the Morris and keep it for over a decade while still expecting it to drive like the Rolls, even though it was broken down and useless.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Also if it is that easy to achieve, Liverpool and spurs with all the money they have spent should have been able to break through consistently at least for the last 3 to 5 years.

We have a wage structure — if someone is already earning insane money we probably can't afford to buy them and break our wage structure.

Meanwhile, according to the Daily Star, Juventus are preparing to offer Gianluigi Donnarumma a big - money contract if negotiations with Milan break down.

In this system the higher the total starting at about 8 ′ the greater the chance of underdog winning, can you break that down further taking into consideration the money line 110-130 130-150 150-170 170-200 and 200 and up also if team is Home or road, Division, League, or inter league and have each month noted.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If baseball's financial system is broken because of the Church of Young Players, maybe it's time to give those young players more money.

And if we don't have that kinda money, tell us point blank that we are broke and we will understand!

Tottenham boss Harry Redknapp has a reputation for being a bit of a wheeler dealer in the transfer market, a man never shy when it comes to spending someone else's money, but for once the vastly - experienced manager may opt against recruiting winter reinforcements, instead opting to follow the age old adage of» If it isn't broke, don't fix it».

If this was a film that broke down half way through the first reel we'd all demand our money back.

Given the amount of transfer rumours flying round this is a very easy way of making money but be warned, if a proposed transfer move breaks down or the rumoured interest in a player ceases then the share price can fall just as quickly!