Sentences with phrase «money making at this point»

Not exact matches

This doesn't mean there isn't a great deal of money to be made during the bear market (on both the long and short side), but at some point we must recognize that our global imbalances all remain.

With that much money at stake, it would only make sense that crypto holdings will start to become a major focal point in IRS audits.

While the express delivery company didn't take off immediately — at one point, he resorted to saving the company with an emergency trip to Vegas and wiring money he made at Black Jack — by the late 1970s, Smith was on his way to building the $ 48 billion company he still runs today.

But the company's willingness to spend (and lose) limitless sums money to drive competitors out of business raises a question regulators might soon have to answer: At what point does being too competitive make you anti-competitive?

It seems unusual to encourage buyers to turn away from trends, because it's such an easy way to continue making money, but Cuyana isn't afraid of you embracing a lean closet; simply because they know that, if you come to them at some point, many of those pieces you love to rely on are bound to be Cuyana - made.

For instance, on his blog Baseline Scenario, University of Connecticut law professor James Kwak makes many of the same points as Quittner — the Zuckerberg - Chan donation isn't really a donation at all but a newly formed LLC that will have significant tax benefits for the couple, who will retain almost complete control over their money.

The landlord makes the money back at some point.

At some point you have to prove that you can make some money.

The first involves the «inverted U curve,» which models the inflection point at which the addition of units — of effort, of people, of money — stops making something better; and the further point at which adding units actually makes something worse.

Yet at some point something changes: the founder gets bored, the company starts making money in a pivot that wasn't part of the original vision or even funds run low but not low enough to justify shutting the doors - especially when there's revenue involved.

airBnb had to sell cereal at one point to keep their company alive, in the early days of FedEx their CEO gambled his money at blackjack to win and make payroll.

And while Reddit told CNN Money that it «provides fair market salaries» to all employees, skeptics point out that most companies will make this claim to employees, who are generally forced to take them at their word.

He acknowledged that he and his counterparts around the world have made things difficult for savers, while pointing out that low inflation will at least preserve the value of their money.

They make an immediate bit of money, but they have only borrowed the stocks, so they need to 1) replace the stock at some point in the future and 2) pay dividends out of their own pockets for the length of borrowing the stock.

(It makes money not by tracking and profiling its users, as Google does, but by serving ads based on the search terms being used at the point of each search, and also from affiliate revenue.)

But business blogging is different than all of that, because your blog is neither 1) a hobby, like many people's personal blogs, nor 2) the primary way your business makes money — because heck, at that point your blog is just your entire business!

But to make money from the stock market, at some point they will need to get back in.

Don't get us wrong, there probably is an automated trading software when you sign up, it's highly likely to be just a generic white label software; its effectiveness is irrelevant as the scammers already make money at the point of you funding your broker account.

You'd then make the minimum monthly payments on your card until the promotional 0 % APR expires, at which point you'd withdraw the money, pay the balance in full and profit any remaining difference.

At TSI over the past year and at the TSI Blog two months ago I've made the point that the Fed gave itself the ability to pay interest on bank reserves so that the Fed Funds Rate (FFR) could be raised without the need to shrink bank reserves and the economy - wide money supplAt TSI over the past year and at the TSI Blog two months ago I've made the point that the Fed gave itself the ability to pay interest on bank reserves so that the Fed Funds Rate (FFR) could be raised without the need to shrink bank reserves and the economy - wide money supplat the TSI Blog two months ago I've made the point that the Fed gave itself the ability to pay interest on bank reserves so that the Fed Funds Rate (FFR) could be raised without the need to shrink bank reserves and the economy - wide money supply.

The success of Demandware relies heavily upon its ability to add new clients, create new services to further integrate clients into its system, and at some point make money.

I think there was definitely a time where it was where I needed to be, but I finally got to the point where I thought I could either keep doing this and make good money at it, or I could stop and not make much money at all but feel freedom and purpose.»

He makes his money by pointing at the sins of others, while he himself is one of the big sinners!

The pews, the buildings, the clergy, the politics, the money, the power, the liturgy, the bells and smells, the holidays, the dress code, the rules, and everything else that we think of as «church» was at one point, someone's minor little innovation to help them make disciples.

At one point, Phillips says, the taxi drivers at the Allahabad train station started putting Yeshu Darbar's name on their vehicles because they wanted to divert its visitors in order to make moneAt one point, Phillips says, the taxi drivers at the Allahabad train station started putting Yeshu Darbar's name on their vehicles because they wanted to divert its visitors in order to make moneat the Allahabad train station started putting Yeshu Darbar's name on their vehicles because they wanted to divert its visitors in order to make money.

Again, though rightly showing some desire at least to exculpate the bank clerk who in effect helps the bank robbers steal, and certainly intentionally helps them move the money, Cummings is on shaky ground given the general points he makes.

You make a great point there at the end about who deserves our money.

i think making money off of a blog at this point probably requires a lot of luck but also more than a full - time job's - worth of effort, honestly.

«It is not illegal if Wesfarmers do it with a Coles supermarket in a new town and it is not illegal if Amazon comes in and sets a price point that only makes money at a certain scale.»

I'm getting annoyed that people fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting bad) while it is very fair points that he made very wrong judgement in not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive at time in term of tactics.

I think in my own mind the real creime he's committed against the fans in particular is to keep blowing the boards trumpet for them without acctually saying he is if he genuinely wanted to win trophies rather than just turn a profit then he should have told the board,» give me the money to make this team what it could be or else Im leaving» the board would have sh!t thier pants at that point and given him the means to produce a team worthy of the past glories he has amassed.

The money, at this point, is secondary to Thomas making the leap on the PGA Tour and becoming one of its superstars, a spot that some pegged for him since his rookie season two years ago.

While I see your point I think it's been made pretty clear by everyone Wenger has complete control when it comes to footballing matters at arsenal and as Charlie Nicholas said a few seasons back it is arsene who decides to buy or walk away for example holding was told of arsenal's interest in him and it took three weeks for Wenger to agree to sign him for # 2million, that's not exactly a lot of money to arsenal is it.

At which point he will have made so much bloody money that he will be perfectly happy to ride off into the sunset after making more money in the sport on a talent to $ $ $ basis than anyone I can think of.

Think Brock will come back to UFC, at this point he can make more money for a single fight in UFC than he can wrestling in WWE for a whole year.

But as you have correctly pointed out though is that we only really spent the budget on 2 additional players really (even thought i believe that they would have been covered by c / l monies and other finances from building projects we make money and monies owed from debts owed to us from barca and others for players sold in years gone buy on thus not really touching the puma and emirates money at all # 70 million +).

but the atmosphere at emirates is sad like terrible u look at anfield and it hurts me because we're such poorly ran club from fans point view we're are diehards all splits all over stadium joke we need leaders at arsenal top too bottom but this arsenal is not arsenal of old were is our Tony Adams ray palour, we're is our pride how dear man Utd get Sanchez like how dear even ask pride is word here folks we have none as in overheads us fans are joke like boycott next game stay away or go and stand outside stadium for full match stand together stand tall we will be heard we are arsenal we are there customers we are Gona make change but by money cause that's wat this club is money and Sanchez Utd proves it

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

The point I was making is that in 2004 when wenger was at his best he could have gone to a club with lots of money.

now we are putting all our eggs in the miki basket by signing auba hoping to recreate the dortmund connnection, Auba a player better than laca but so similar it makes no sense spending that amount of money especially with all the cracks in the team, but hey lets do that and get rid of giroud our only option B upfront to accomodate miki a player who is 29 and at the lowest point of his career, building a team around him shows me that sad state we our in, we take what we are given and try to make the best of the situation and that's all of us from the board to the manager to the players all the way down to the fans.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

its rubbish that we can survive or more outrageously as claimed by said Ozil today, win anything without these players coming in Don't boast of a 100» 000 war chest and then quibble over pennies for a player we don't at this point know anything about and as I've stated before may or may not be a great player in the next three or four seasons, (makes you think is beilik an investment for resale to make more money?)

I agree about not taking the cheap shots at him, BUT he DOES TELL LIES he does make absolute balls ups of things and he point blank refuses to spend money where its needed, and thats why he gets the cheap shots.

I have ceaselessly made the point that without money there is no realistic Arsenal run at the EPL title.

Granted, these guys probably haven't made a much money at this point and WWE could choose to sit on their contract.

They made the choice for this relationship to be open to the public and have made money off televising it, at this point it's ok for us to discuss it.

He will make plenty of money at that point, and this suspension will end up having been more of an annoyance than anything else.

In fact with a vision-less and passion-less board as ours, Wenger as arrogant and as past it as he might is the only semblance of sanity, I don't support Wenger I believe he is currently doing a marvelous job, I support him because I can see a couple of moves ahead already, if Wenger leaves and the board stays the same, we are massively effed, Newcastle will be child's play, Kroenke's other teams are mid table contenders, he will simply look at another money making model for Arsenal, even Usamanov believes Arsene needs backing, if Usmanov came in today, he will not fire Wenger, he will seek to work with him, give him a clear mandate, back him up without pointing at the balance sheeets and if he still does not deliver, looks like a guy who would fire Wenger mid s - season, legacy or not.

Again, this is a team game, his head blown and he is about money now which can be understood at this point of his career going on 29 wich is pretty much 30 even if CR7 makes statistic lies, stilll; he is not 23 or 25.

We'll join the smart money and take Indy minus the points, at home, as they look to make more noise than they did in last year's playoffs.