Making
money on denial is about as immoral as it is possible to be, and people get away with it thanks to the delayed consequences.
Not exact matches
With perceived predatory pricing practices, including the so - called «
denial of
money» attack, so commonplace, it is no surprise that this aspect of cloud growth has become a meme and has even been jokingly referenced
on the television show Silicon Valley.
At least we now know that the deluded one has had # 250 million available, for the past 4 season's to spend
on transfers... (Thanks to Gazidis latest comments) Add them facts to Wenger's
denial of not having that kind of budget, along with his words of treating the club as if it belongs to him, in other words he doesn't like spending
money (The man is sooo tight that there's no bubbles when he farts in the bath)??
On the flip side we're also seeing a rise in cyber attacks in the education and public sectors with the Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks on the NHS making national headlines last year and more recently hoax bomb phishing emails demanding money from school
On the flip side we're also seeing a rise in cyber attacks in the education and public sectors with the Distributed
Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks
on the NHS making national headlines last year and more recently hoax bomb phishing emails demanding money from school
on the NHS making national headlines last year and more recently hoax bomb phishing emails demanding
money from schools.
And here's Joe Konrath over here making
money hand over fist self - publishing
on Kindle (even if Publisher's Weekly is in total
denial about it).
You could snowball all of that extra
money into paying off the next debt
on your list, but if you're starting to feel the strain of so much self -
denial, you could also divide the
money you've freed up, putting a portion toward extra debt repayment and keeping some for things you enjoy.
However, having put myself out for five years to answer nonsense in some more neutral locations, I have found that the overwhelmingly professional (and amateur)
denial generation machine, ever refining its techniques, and with vast
money and politics at its command, is so relentless and so without conscience that the only thing to do was to move
on and go elsewhere.
The irony is obvious, but there's also the added point that while oil
money is behind a lot of the
denial, they themselves are ready to jump
on the positive — for them — effects of global warming.
This book is the definitive dialogue
on the subject of paranoid hysterical paranoid alarmists and their
denial of evidence for human - caused climate change — the
money behind that
denial, the political ideologies involved, and of course the unbridled greed that drives
denial and denialism.
Fenton's proposal to Podesta and its prime goal to «make Murdoch's climate
denial a major issue,» and «bring the scientific facts
on climate change to his audiences,» was ironically released a day after an unwelcome story ran in London's Daily Mail with the headline «Exposed: How top university helped secure # 9million of YOUR
money by passing off rivals» research as its own... to bankroll climate change agenda.»
This is not just ignorance
on these climate and environment haters; it is
denial of the facts so the rich billionaires can make more
money.
... If you believe that solving the climate change problem «is fundamentally a technological challenge,» then we are in this mess not because of the power of the fossil fuel lobby, not because of the influence of the campaign of
denial, not because of
money politics, not because persuading consumers to accept a price
on carbon seems too hard, and not because getting international cooperation has been fraught.
A claim
denial can be disappointing, even maddening, to a traveler counting
on getting their
money back, but here's something you may not know - just because your claim was denied doesn't mean that's the final answer.