It's time we amp up the pressure on Chase and take
their money out of the coal industry.
Not exact matches
I guess I feel the same way about a liberal agenda that say that to get
out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax
money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more
coal and oil than any other nation on the planet.
«At this point in time what it does show is people
out there are prepared to invest substantial amounts
of money in
coal assets and Rio's predominantly foreign owned already - that's another issue to remember - and I've been reading a couple
of comments and I think even the unions are in support
of this one.
But nobody wants to own or run
coal and gas generators if they can only make
money out of them for a few hours on a few days.
Trying
out high - priced ports
of earlier games might be a good canary in the
coal mine to see if people are receptive to spending big
money on Nintendo games on mobile up front.
When we send
money to big oil and king
coal, that
money gets filtered upward into a top - down corporate hegemony that keeps
money out of local communities.
Perhaps the most totemic sign
of the times came in September when the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a philanthropic body set up by the heirs to the Standard Oil fortune, announced that it would pull its
money out of fossil fuels, beginning with
coal and tar sands.
Some bigger Central Appalachia
coal producers may be running
out of time and
money.
350 uses online campaigns, grassroots organizing, and mass public actions to oppose new
coal, oil and gas projects, take
money out of the companies that are heating up the planet, and build 100 % clean energy solutions that work for all.
But to win
money from the newly - available federal Clean
Coal Power Initiative, Southern now promised to also use TRIG to capture most
of the plant's carbon dioxide, which would be compressed and piped
out to older underproducing oil fields and injected into the ground to drive more oil to the surface — a process called enhanced oil recovery.
While the institute rejects claims it is a front group, one
of its senior fellows,
coal industry veteran Fred Palmer, told DeSmog in February 2017 that he was «reaching
out to the fossil fuel community right now and raising
money for Heartland.»
Although US President Trump has torn up the nation's promise to contain global warming, and invoked
coal as a key part
of his energy strategy, other studies have pointed
out that
coal is a bad bargain: the US would gain far more in human health, lives saved and return on investment if it put the
money into renewables such as solar power.
If emission reductions are enforced in Australia, and the world, the value
of coal will continue to decline and the recycling rather than the mining
of metals will become much more economically attractive — a lot
of the
money will go
out of mining.