Charters receive more
money per pupil because they don't receive the same level of services from the central office as traditional schools do.
Not exact matches
[Cuomo said the latest lawsuit challenging the way New York allocates education dollars is flawed
because the state spends more
money per pupil — on average — than any other state and doesn't get top results.]
Public schools in Cleveland actually have more
money per pupil as a result of school vouchers,
because they keep
money not used to pay for the voucher.
Because public charter schools»
per -
pupil funding is often inequitable compared to that of traditional public schools (about 75 - 80 % on average when compared to traditional schools nationwide), virtually all charter schools must use operational funding —
money which otherwise would go towards educational purposes and classroom teaching and learning — to cover capital budget shortfalls.
A lump sum and
per pupil funding formula is not the most efficient way to share out a limited pot of
money, although it is simple,
because it assumes that every extra child costs the same to educate.
They're polarizing
because they take
money from public schools, which can't easily lower their costs as they lose
per -
pupil spending and lack access to additional sources of funding through private donors.
Charters are attracted to the city
because of
money — the school district receives $ 7,686
per pupil from the state this year.
He said: «We know that school budgets are already at breaking point
because the government is not planning to raise the amount of
money offered
per pupil even though costs are rising every year.
This is
because on top of the regular
per pupil funding, it gets
money that would previously have been held back by the local authority to provide services such as special needs support.