There are exceptions, but generally speaking the districts spending the
most money per student are producing the worst academic results.
Studies have found publicly funded but privately run charter schools typically receive
less money per student than traditional public schools.
The big news out of the latest is official confirmation that school districts spent less
money per student in 2010 - 11 than they had the year before, the first one - year decline in nearly four decades.
Your version of a «tipped» playing field is that charters don't get nearly as much
money per student as do neighboring district schools.
In each year from 2011 - 12 to 2015 - 16 — which includes the years East Detroit was paying down its debt — the district received more
money per student for school operations.
In any case, the higher costs put a major kink in the business side of the Madison Prep proposal and also made it less palatable to the district, which wants to limit the amount
of money per student it puts into Madison Prep beyond what it spends per student in the rest of the district.
A proposal in the Georgia General Assembly would give more money to state charter schools, which get
less money per student than traditional public schools yet must outperform traditional schools or risk losing their charters.
Many of the school districts that spend the
most money per student have the lowest test scores, graduation rates, and rankings from the Mississippi Department of Education.
New York spends more
money per student than any other state in the country, and yet its schools yield mediocre education outcomes, such as test scores and graduation rates.
«The governor is fighting to reform a system that spends more
money per student than any other state in the nation while condemning hundreds of thousands of children to failing schools over the last decade,» said Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi.
«The governor is fighting to reform a system that spends more
money per student than any other state in the nation while condemning hundreds of thousands of children to failing schools over the last decade,» Azzopardi said.
On the other hand, charters get 19 percent less
money per student than district - operated schools, according to one analysis.
Osborne then shows that the charter sector accomplishes this with less
money per student than the district and in spite of the fact that the charter sector has a higher percentage of low - income and non-white students.
«A disproportionate share of
money per student is going to charter schools, and, as the state economy struggles, there's a lot of attention being paid to that,» he said.
SALT LAKE CITY — Utah schools have less
money per student than any other state in the nation, including the District of Columbia.
Yet charters can be more segregated than ever, and get more
money per student, plus lots of services and in - kind staffing.
The plaintiffs said that when they negotiated their current contracts with the School Board in 2011, they were guaranteed a certain amount of
money per student.
State funds for special education are inequitably distributed, so sometimes the districts with the highest needs are getting less
money per student than districts with lower needs.
State funds for special education are also inequitably distributed, so sometimes the districts with the highest needs are getting less
money per student than districts with lower needs.
The School Board funds every charter school based on its population using a set amount of
money per student, Lewis replied.
Communities with higher median incomes were more likely to have these fund - raising groups in the first place and, perhaps not surprisingly, more likely to raise more
money per student than those in less affluent neighborhoods.
Chicago schools to receive more
money per student, but less overall as enrollment dips fw.to / AiFwJ7k
Why we like it: The Perkins loan has a very competitive interest rate, no loan fees, more
money per student than Stafford loans, and a longer grace period than other loans.
Phrases with «money per student»