Sentences with phrase «money problem because»

That created a big money problem because he had eight children by then.

«We learned not to ignore our money problems because it can often make matters worse.»

A number of the people who fall into the A2J gap are «problem clients» who «have money problems because they refuse to lower their standard of living and try to abuse pro bono programs and legal aid clinics,» Achimalbe writes.

Not exact matches

There are fewer problems in the first place, because online applications — which make their money from subscriptions, not support contracts — tend to have modern, easy - to - use interfaces.

Here is the problem: Facebook and Google built successful, wildly profitable businesses because they have figured out a way to make money on digital content without actually getting into the messy, expensive business of producing it.

In my NYT bestselling book, Killing Sacred Cows, I warn people of the 15 major problems of the 401 (k), including: you're not the owner but only the beneficiary of your 401 (k), the government can change the rules at any time, you can't get to the money until 59 1/2, and the fees are typically much higher than most investments out there because you've added complexity and layers of administration and legal fees.

We're all familiar with the cliche that money can not buy happiness, but I'm convinced that almost everybody has to learn that lesson the hard way because let's face it; the idea of having enough money to throw at your problems until they're solved is a seductive impulse.

So one of the reasons there is a flood of venture capital money into the space is because investors see an opportunity for innovation to solve some of these hard problems that exist out there.»

Noting that the San Francisco ride - sharing startup lost somewhere north of $ 1.2 billion in the first half of 2016, Bloomberg's Justin Fox says that's a problem not because Uber's in danger of running out of money — it has raised around $ 15 billion — but because it spent that money without getting anything concrete in return, on ephemeral stuff like incentives to attract new drivers.

You think you've resolved problems by handing out a raise, but you haven't solved any problems, because money is not likely to be the problem anyway.

Forcing a creditor to turn your debt over to a collection agency will simply cause you bigger problems in the future because many collection agencies are relentless when it comes to recovering money.

The second problem with bitcoin may be summarized as follows: this money may be more volatile and prone to devaluation because it is not backed by secure assets.

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

Waiting is a problem because money received in the future is not worth as much as today.

Are our politicians really going to do anything that is going to affect monies coming in there own pocket books?Is the government really interested in resolving this huge problem with the companies listed above or are they pretending to be concerned because that is what politics say they should do.

The problem with building passive income my way is that you start becoming completely oblivious to the income production because you aren't utilizing the money.

«In a highly leveraged company, bank debt is dangerous, because if the company runs into problems the bank will ask for its money back.

The problem with that is is that that's a failing strategy because you're constantly having to go out and borrow money or find some way to finance your operation because there's no bottom line associated with your business, and so there's no way to grow your equity or your cash.

This is a big problem in many countries because the rates on the peer to peer market (including tellers in this case) are sometimes abusive, and can easily be higher than the fees regular companies such as Western Union and Money Gram charge.

The problem arises, however, when expectations become mismatched: The Gordons no longer sought to create wealth because they did not need more money in their bank accounts, while owners of the enterprise presumably bought shares because they wanted to get richer.

First, because a proven ability to make the payments turns out to be a very good indicator of your ability to eventually pay the money back, even if you run into problems.

So if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have less money to spend, less purchasing power.

It depends on the interest rate of the United States Treasury bond, which is considered the «risk - free» rate because Congress can always tax people or print money to wipe out those obligations (each has its problems, but the theory here is sound).

But if oil gets too high, that's a problem as well, because then people have no more money to spend for expendable income, because they're putting it all into their gas tank.

The reason this is a problem is because having your money sitting in a bank account earning a measly interest rate won't help you beat out inflation.

My pastor has NEVER had a problem talking about greed and the economic crisis because Jesus NEVER had a problem talking about greed and money.

Jeremy thanks for your comments alot of this i never really thought about before until you provoked me to seek the truth in the word it is what we all should be doing finding the truth for ourselves God wants to reveal mysterys if we are open to hear.If we have been christians awhile we just take the word of whoevers preaching or whichever clip we see on god tube its knowledge but not revelation.Because the story sounds plausible we tag that on to our belief for example for many years i believed that the rich young rulers problem was money so the way to deal with that problem is to give it away and be a follower of Jesus sounds plausible.Till you realise every believers situation is different so the message has to be universal.So the reason its not about money because it excludes those that do nt have it and does nt make room for those that do have it but do nt worship it.The rich young ruler was not a bad person he lived by a good moral code but he made money his idol he put that before God.The word says we shall not have any idols thats a sin and a wicked one.In fact there wasnt any room in his heart for Jesus that is a tragedy.So when we see the message is about Idolatry we all have areas that we chose not to submit to God thats universal everyone of us whether we are rich or poor.I believe we are unaware that we have these idols what are some of them that was revealed to me our partners our children our work our church our family i can sense some of you are getting fidgetty.

«But, Dr. DuBridge points out, «A host of techniques capable of solving mankind's problems and easing his burdens can not be used because we do not know how to bring adequate resources of money, labor and materials, and most of all, management to bear on the problems — or bring them to bear in such a way that the results achieved would, in a monetary sense, justify the costs.»

Not that there are no consequences but because the master has already borne the consequence of action that was not «blameless» Perhaps the word property is a problem, here is the king James translation: 21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.

The problem was not a lack of money because hundreds of millions of dollars were raised by Mother Teresa's ministry, but rather a particular perception of suffering and death.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

In the end the club got closed because of money problems.

If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.

United can do whatever the F they want with their money (Sanchez deal was beyond stupid and ridiculous, if you ask me, because it's gonna»cause more problem for them).

Getting Lukaku is a problem, because we do not seem to do business with his agent, he seem to only care about the money

For years we were complaining how we can not compete with City because we don't have money, but it turns out money isn't the biggest problem after all is it?

Now I am not calling for anyone's head, not Allegri, not Dybala because Juve's and Italian football problem is not just money.

u know the problem with some fans make top four seem more important than a trophy.the reason arsenal wants top four is because of the money thats a fact everyone knows that.but as we move to city, man u they want ucl so that they can attract the big names thays why man u is fighting, same mancity notop four they know attracting world class players will be tough.do u think thats the same reason arsenal wants to finish top four??

I personally think he needs to bulk up some... Bielek is earning rave reviews though and his progression is going as planned, Akpom needs a proper talking to, his problem is more attotude than lack of ability, just like Gnabry, I think because both had a run with the senior squad they feel like they are big enough to.command regular shirts where they play which is not the case, you have to earn the right to play on a Saturday afternoon, its never handed out to you... all in all, its been a disastrous season for us of you look at progress Te English players are making at Spuds whilst our» s sit on their asses earning ridiculous money for doing eff all....

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

Wenger needs to go because he is the main problem of our failures on the pitch, also we need to put that illusion of no money to bed as we have one of the biggest wage budget in europe but it doesn't show because we are paying a lot of useless players big wages and underpaying players like sanchez.

Thierry Henry has said it all, that there's is a problem in arsenal, there was a time he don't even relate with his teams mate and he question why Sanchez will remain at arsenal after the display against Liverpool, I have said it before the big issue on ground is not money that the player are demanding but the ambition of the club... henry also said, when u are playing for arsenal u are comfortable whether u are playing well or not because there's no pressure on u....

«I'm not sure if money is going to keep him there at the moment because if he's storming out of training and not playing in games... it doesn't seem to be a problem for him when he does come on because he still performs to the best of his ability.

We're going to waste time and money on a CB when we should be looking for a top class DM.If Wenger think signing another CB is solving our problems then he's lying to himself.Mark my words any other CB we sign no matter how good will still come and add to a shaky defense.The problem with our defenfing is more of tactical and mental.Tactical because we play without a DM, we mark and track players poorly, the fullbacks are usually isolated leaving them to cope alone, our passing is not good enough leaving us exposed to counters which we aren't prepared for and no leadership and maintenance of defensive shape.

If this offer is real, it will cause a major problem because we have about 8 players who are better than Ox, and who will demand more money.

Of course the money issue is a problem, because although Arsenal are in a financially strong position, to shell out almost a quarter of a million a week to one player, is a very large sum of money!

One last thing because I appreciate your thoughtful response, but my main problem with the Paris Climate Accord is that it uses the U.S. to subsidize, and therefore redistribute money to other countries when I think the money would be better spent here at home since we are already one of the world's top 5 polluters.

I'd like to finish with the contract rebels on that matter, because they epitomise the entire problem and it's not money.

I would love them in Arsenal's squad as well, but the problem is money, because Arsenal is known for stinginess.

but thats because of wenger too, he is part of the problem since he always have privilege money than glory... besides his average decitions on the field..