Sentences with phrase «money problems which»

Sir Henry noted how the legal problems associated with employment and housing «clustered» together with money problems which led to «a cascade effect» in which a difficulty in one aspect of life created problems elsewhere.

Not exact matches

There are fewer problems in the first place, because online applications — which make their money from subscriptions, not support contracts — tend to have modern, easy - to - use interfaces.

It's not a problem if you have to borrow money to cover your budget for a month in which your expenses are higher due to unusual circumstances.

Bill, he told me repeatedly, knew no other solution than throwing money and people at a problem, which was why Microsoft's software was so convoluted and mediocre.

The problem many of us face is figuring out which form of content is worth investing our time and money in that's had the most success with other brands.

The family's bank of choice has long been Deutsche Bank, which was the only bank willing to loan to Trump after he lost others money in a series of bankruptcies — something he figured «was the bank's problem, not mine,» he wrote in his 2007 book, «Think Big: Make it Happen in Business and Life.»

Getting lots of money from Spotify may be great for music labels and owners, but it's not doing much for Spotify: The company lost $ 200 million last year, and the massive payments it makes to record companies (which amount to more than 85 % of its revenues) are a big part of the problem.

Ursula Adams, director of employee engagement at United Way for Southeastern Michigan, says using the daily - engagement app Niko Niko — which tracks employees» mood data with its mobile «happiness meter» — has helped her avoid sinking money into fixing the wrong cultural problems.

The problem seems to be that the money for the program is to come from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, to which Congress has attached some strict («onerous» is the adjective du jour) conditions.

«The problem with this is when you have zero money for so long, the marginal benefits you get through consumption greatly diminish, but there's one thing that doesn't diminish, which is unintended consequences.»

But you may have encountered a problem where it wasn't always easy to meet the minimum deposits required to invest in some of the funds you want, which means that the end result was oftentimes that you'd have a portion of your money sitting in a money market fund instead of your desired ETF.

Dan Kline: Sprint is on better ground, but they haven't spent a lot of money on their network, which is a problem.

In effect, European leaders have announced «We have agreed to solve our debt problem, leveraging money we do not have, to create a fund, which will then borrow several times that amount, in order to buy enormous amounts of new debt that we will need to issue.»

My guess is that as the problems of the real estate sector kick in, with lower prices causing a drop in real estate development, which matters for employment, we are likely to see additional stimulus spending aimed at managing the threat of unemployment and, perhaps more importantly, at managing the possibility of rising anger among provincial elites as the glorious prospect of easy money continues to retreat.

That's going to be a problem for the health care bill — senators want to bolster the financial assistance for lower - income people buying private insurance and soften some of the House bill's Medicaid cuts, which will cost more money.

Startups are constantly tackling problems, big and small — determining product - market fit, developing traction and early adopters, hiring the right talent, raising money (and figuring out how to spend that money)-- but the key is figuring out which ones matter most to the company's leaders at any given point in time.

According to Giuliani, the «fund of money» was Trump's regular retainer to Cohen, which seems to have been what amounts to a slush fund for Cohen to deal with Trump's various problems.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

The dynamics of the debt money system, the phenomenon of capital consumption (which we believe is an «under - reported» major economic problem — although not on this web site, to be sure), the war on cash, and the rise of Bitcoin all have dedicated chapters in this year's report.

He talks about how we tend to want to spend money instead of saving which is fun in the present but causes major problems in retirement.

According to Keith Neumeyer, chairman of the First Mining Gold company, the main problem is that the governments print too much money that is not secured by gold — a tendency which he said is unlikely to change in the near future.

«Money being reinvested into a business is, by definition, not immediately accreting to shareholders, which we think may be a problem given high consensus earnings growth expectations,» says Castagno, adding that the companies most at risk, based on elevated expectations and likelihood of reinvestment, are those in Consumer Staples, Financials, Health Care, and Industrials.

The fundamental problem is that the ECB and the BoJ are trying to implement QE through the normal credit creation channels of the banking system (which aren't working) and relying on interest rate cuts, instead of creating new money in the hands of firms and households outside of the banking system by asset purchases directly from these non-bank entities.

I think I can follow Buffett's logic to invest to a certain extent: He seems to be relatively bullish on Canada and he judged the problems of Home Capital Group as a liquidity and reputation problem which he could heal with short - term money and his name.

It depends on the interest rate of the United States Treasury bond, which is considered the «risk - free» rate because Congress can always tax people or print money to wipe out those obligations (each has its problems, but the theory here is sound).

The ways in which money issues get intertwined with power, nurture, and love issues should be discussed, as should practical strategies for coping with money problems through sound budgeting.

They are also saying this is a judgment of God... and not just the money problems, but all the natural disasters too which we know have been very bad this year.

(which add to the money problem).

Here the church may lend its official public support; supply monies; provide clerical and lay leadership, volunteers, and facilities to programs aimed at redressing social problems in the community which are contributory factors in producing mental illness.

An insidious problem with buildings and church employees (and the need for money to pay for them) that I have seen in every church of which I have been a part is that those who give the most are the most valued.

Considerations concerning property and money and arranging their transference to same sex friends during life and after death should cause no real problem in the light of this Gospel gem which is far removed from make believe and fairy tale.

The appeal of detective fiction, James argues, is especially strong in a secular age of drastic disorder — in «times of unrest, anxiety and uncertainty, when society can be faced with problems which no money, political theories or good intentions seem able to solve or alleviate.»

Third, it tends to help him face the fact that his problem is not the lack of money, which has been one of his favorite rationalizations, but staying sober.

«reality» listed many items which has America faced, but it sounds like the issue in the essay has to do with America's political turmoil and MONEY problems... THERE's the dodge...

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

The reason I wrote the book is to provide you with the perfect solution to the common problem of time, money and inspiration, which I've found over the years, is often a stumbling block to healthy eating.

There is a problem since any money in which the Hawks take dead money into CAP space for the Hawks would have to wait until after the NBA year ends in July.

I personally think he needs to bulk up some... Bielek is earning rave reviews though and his progression is going as planned, Akpom needs a proper talking to, his problem is more attotude than lack of ability, just like Gnabry, I think because both had a run with the senior squad they feel like they are big enough to.command regular shirts where they play which is not the case, you have to earn the right to play on a Saturday afternoon, its never handed out to you... all in all, its been a disastrous season for us of you look at progress Te English players are making at Spuds whilst our» s sit on their asses earning ridiculous money for doing eff all....

utd are acting in desperation getting di marira does not solve their problems they still need defensive cover which will cost them even more money

If you are in favour of throwing money at problems (which we don't have), please feel free to go and support Man City, Real Madrid or Man U amongst others.

That's as long as he's healthy, which is a big if... The other problem is that he would likely cost Arsenal a considerable amount of money, but adding him could help Arsenal improve on the SBR reviewed Ladbrokes odds to win the Premier League next year.

Arsenal have become way too obsessed with preaching rubbish about developing players (Which we don't actually do) and not spending money (Which everybody else does), blaming anything except the manager for our problems (Always the referee & officials) and not being pragmatic enough about winning the big trophies, but only being interested in winning big profits.

We're going to waste time and money on a CB when we should be looking for a top class DM.If Wenger think signing another CB is solving our problems then he's lying to himself.Mark my words any other CB we sign no matter how good will still come and add to a shaky defense.The problem with our defenfing is more of tactical and mental.Tactical because we play without a DM, we mark and track players poorly, the fullbacks are usually isolated leaving them to cope alone, our passing is not good enough leaving us exposed to counters which we aren't prepared for and no leadership and maintenance of defensive shape.

Lukaku has a chance to play with this calibre which is not the problem but teams like Everton rely on the transfer money of the striker for their window.

My problem now lies with the cost; for years now we have been moaning about the board not allocating money to Wenger, which the last time i wrote on this website dispelled as a lie; he justified spending # 16 Million on Calum Chambers; which with the greatest of respect, I'm yet to see him pay of 50 % of that value.

It is not getting any better for Arsenal fans and Arsene Wenger, and instead of the last few days of the transfer window being a period in which the problems of the team could be sorted by spending some big money on the right players after a poor start to the latest Premier League campaign, it is turning into a time of even more misery as we lose key stars to direct rivals and are unable to replace them because players do not seem to be too keen on signing for the Gunners anymore.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

He said that we don't have such a problem and practically said that we are just a money machine which Arsenal very successfully rides.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

«The problem at the moment is no one seems able to pay all the money that Ronaldo incurs, meaning about # 48m ($ 60m) that Madrid may want plus the wages, which will be # 16m - # 20m ($ 20 - 25m) net.»