Watching House of Cards is certainly more fun than funding the real House of Cards, but the lack of engagement from voters in
the money side of campaigns has serious, deleterious effects.
Not exact matches
Given the large amount
of money that was made with well - run
campaigns, the temptation to move over to the «dark
side» brought a proliferation
of copycat sites which presented almost no value for the consumer.
His public image will shape the American political environment,
of course, but plenty
of politicians and political professionals on all
sides will also look to his ground - breaking online
campaign as an inspiration, seeking to replicate his success at using the internet to raise
money, find supporters and put people to work in the real world.
There were months
of negative
campaign ads, bolstered by outside
money on both
sides.
But if the donor community and the establishment
of old New York Democratic
money is on Cuomo's
side in this
campaign, it could suck up a lot
of the oxygen, which is why Nixon's team is so critical.
On the Hillary
side of things, it's true that she has raised a lot more
money for down - ticket democrats via her Hillary Victory Fund, but she also made that
money conditional on state democratic parties supporting her
campaign, which I think is REALLY low.
The real
money, even for longtime incumbents, comes out
of Washington, where congressional
campaign managers on both
sides are carefully watching developments in close districts.
Unfortunately freedom
of speech is contingent to how much
money you have given that the media is itself a business that has to make profits as well, so a «lobbyist» like this comes to this program without any ethics, without any remorse but with a lot
of money as well to openly acknowledge that: yes, we put
money in this governor's elections, we are expecting he pay us back and will stand on our
side of the equation, and yes, we have collected (very fast) the private necessary
money to run a public relations
campaign (
of lies if necessary) to guarantee that our privileges are well kept; and he finds a free stand to speak out freely and without appropriate response As far as Liz, I'm not sure if it is only a being naïve issue.
On the other
side of the aisle, a liberal
campaign money watchdog group said removing the limits on donations would be no better than keeping Citizens United in place.
Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 %
of labours spending in 1997 came from the private
side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give
money to the labour party, we knew the next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we win the
campaign, lost the election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost
of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos
of Ukip, But labour has a lot
of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory
Clegg said he did not blame Cameron for the loss
of the Brexit vote, but said the
campaign was «very bloodless and allowed a more emotionally impactful argument in favour
of dollops
of money for the NHS, and economic utopia, the traffic would flow, the sun would shine, it allowed the other
side to make these ludicrous claims... in a relatively unchallenged way».
The journey through the game's
campaign will provide you with plenty
of gameplay for your
money, especially for a shooter, as long as you take advantage
of the numerous
side missions and activities along the way rather than trying to push your way to the end as quickly as possible.
Free flight is a good bet to get a hang
of flying World War II fighter planes from Spitfire to Junkers Ju 87, all purchasable with
money earned from the
campaign missions and their optional
side missions.