As a friend of mine pointed out long ago, the winners don't get a lot more
money than the losers in high school sports, so why would anyone risk their health for a victory that will most likely be forgotten in a few months?
Not exact matches
«I prefer not to pick winners and
losers when we're looking at cryptocurrencies like bitcoin / bitcoin Cash... Both have merits but if I was putting new
money to work today... I would be a lot more interested in buying a lagger that could attract inflows rather
than something that's potentially overbought.»
I guess I feel the same way about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax
money to choose winners and
losers (mostly
losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil
than any other nation on the planet.
It was fucking amazing even though my favorite fighter of all time Condit got finished anyways... Winner: The crowd — Everyone got their
money's worth with the main and co-main event, but the entire main card was great IMO plus there was a freaking omoplata finish BY A HEAVYWEIGHT
Loser: The crowd — From constant boos any time the fighters were on the ground for more
than 10 seconds to «Whooo!»
West Ham on Sunday was technically a
loser but we made
money than we were expecting off this one.
I'd rather have Republicans giving their
money to a lousy
loser candidate
than one who has a chance of winning.
The average of
money raised by the two
losers is more
than the total raised by the 3 winners put together, and the average of the 3 winners is just about what Derrick has raised.
Vos said replacing
money generated from the property tax levy with state dollars is a better approach to property tax relief
than trying to do it through the school aid formula, which he said results in winners and
losers across the state.
Loser: Joe Sestak Despite barely losing to Toomey in 2010, Sestak has raised less
money than both his opponent in the Democratic primary and the Republican incumbent.
«Whether you are a winner or a
loser, you would still be getting more
money than you are getting today.»
However, in the long run, the majority of horseracing punters will lose
money at the track — and there will always be more
losers than winners.
The winner buries the
loser,
than leaves with all the
money.
Played for romantic comedy yuks rather
than gravid melo - operatic contortions (and distinguishing itself from other products of the UK comedy mill by not featuring any old men and women or young boys naked), the picture follows the plight of shiftless
loser, small - time criminal Jimmy (Robert Carlyle) as he steals a lot of
money from three circus clowns and returns to his small Scottish burg to reclaim his lost love Shirley (the insufferable, simpering Shirley Henderson) and their daughter Marlene (Finn Atkins) from the clutches of mild - mannered simp Dek (Rhys Ifans).
They argue the
money could be better spent on bringing innovations to traditional public schools, rather
than picking «winners and
losers» and propping up a specific few nonprofit charter operators, whose «schools of hope» could essentially replace failing neighborhood schools.
As a general rule, companies that make
money regularly are safer
than chronic or even occasional
money losers.
Losers with more
money than brains.