Sentences with phrase «money than market value»

Not exact matches

According to the bulls, the influx of smart money could eclipse all the wealth currently invested in Bitcoin — theoretically more than doubling the market value in one fell swoop.

QUE was trading for less than its cash value... WAY less... it's the closest thing to free money that you'll find in the markets.

[05:50] Do it for passion, not for money [06:10] The importance of innovation and marketing [06:30] Start with a mission and finding how to add value [06:50] Joe Gebbia's trajectory over a decade [07:10] Culture is the ultimate element to building your brand [07:40] Namale Resort [08:00] Finding a way to do more for others than anyone else [08:45] The beauty of competition [09:15] Don't just advertise, become the expert [09:25] Value - added marketing [09:40] It takes 16 impressions to inspire buying behavior [10:10] Do something where marketing isn't marketing [10:30] The 17 - year old kid in real estate [11:35] Find a way to stand out from the crowd — the trash strike example [14:10] Authenticity plays a critical role [16:00] Building reciprocity with your customers [17:00] Double the value you add [17:20] Bringing innovation and marketing to the forefront [18:35] Innovation can mean raising your price [18:55] What innovation really means [19:25] Changing the way something is perceived [20:55] The man who was copying Tony constantly [22:00] Does change happen in a sevalue [06:50] Joe Gebbia's trajectory over a decade [07:10] Culture is the ultimate element to building your brand [07:40] Namale Resort [08:00] Finding a way to do more for others than anyone else [08:45] The beauty of competition [09:15] Don't just advertise, become the expert [09:25] Value - added marketing [09:40] It takes 16 impressions to inspire buying behavior [10:10] Do something where marketing isn't marketing [10:30] The 17 - year old kid in real estate [11:35] Find a way to stand out from the crowd — the trash strike example [14:10] Authenticity plays a critical role [16:00] Building reciprocity with your customers [17:00] Double the value you add [17:20] Bringing innovation and marketing to the forefront [18:35] Innovation can mean raising your price [18:55] What innovation really means [19:25] Changing the way something is perceived [20:55] The man who was copying Tony constantly [22:00] Does change happen in a seValue - added marketing [09:40] It takes 16 impressions to inspire buying behavior [10:10] Do something where marketing isn't marketing [10:30] The 17 - year old kid in real estate [11:35] Find a way to stand out from the crowd — the trash strike example [14:10] Authenticity plays a critical role [16:00] Building reciprocity with your customers [17:00] Double the value you add [17:20] Bringing innovation and marketing to the forefront [18:35] Innovation can mean raising your price [18:55] What innovation really means [19:25] Changing the way something is perceived [20:55] The man who was copying Tony constantly [22:00] Does change happen in a sevalue you add [17:20] Bringing innovation and marketing to the forefront [18:35] Innovation can mean raising your price [18:55] What innovation really means [19:25] Changing the way something is perceived [20:55] The man who was copying Tony constantly [22:00] Does change happen in a second?

The indicated rates of return (other than for each money market fund) are the historical annual compounded total returns for the period indicated including changes in unit value and reinvestment of distributions.

Campbell is better player than Theo, he run forward and backward to support the midfield, it must be a personal with Wenger.i got the impression Wenger does not like a threat or someone to challenge him at any cost.There are few players that should have been sold and use the money to buy a couple of players.We lost on Kanye, ibramovitch, Bailey, and a few others, simply refuse to pay market value.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The conservatives who control the board have neutered the teachers union, prodded neighborhood elementary schools to compete with one another for market share, directed tax money to pay for religious education and imposed a novel pay scale that values teachers by their subjects, so a young man teaching algebra to eighth graders can make $ 20,000 a year more than a colleague teaching world history down the hall.

In this market, tangible quality is more important than value for the money.

If you're in the market for an incredible SUV — and value on - the - road comfort and manners more than ultimate off - road prowess or tow capacity — you'll definitely want to check out this Chevrolet Equinox LT. Save money at the pump with this fuel - sipping Chevrolet Equinox.

The hybrid authors surveyed reported themselves to be more motivated by money than the others and less impressed with publishers» ability to add any value by making a book «more like what the market wants.»

If you're dead set on never spending a cent on book marketing, you'll get less value from this than someone who embraces the concept that you have to spend money to make money.

I think it is a much better value for the money than any Apple tablet that will be on the market this year.

If you have a 401 (k) plan at work that includes a stable - value fund, you might keep your cash allocation in the fund, which may offer a somewhat higher yield than, say, a money - market mutual fund.

Whether or not you made money can get even trickier if your ACB is lower than the current market value of the asset.

Making money on small moves in the market would be way more stressful and likely way less successful than buying for long term value and growth.

With over 10 years of experience in the fields of research, marketing, sales and distribution, Opperman saw in his situation, an opportunity to create a platform where sellers receive more money than ever thought possible, while at the same time the buyers are able to purchase diamonds and jewelry at below retail prices; for the first time ever, a unique model that adds value to both sides of the equation.

Although money market funds traditionally hold their value at a share price of $ 1, there's no guarantee that the principal value won't deviate from $ 1, which makes the MMF riskier than the comparable bank and brokerage account products.

It is quite obvious that if the market continues to increase in value by over 7 %, we can earn approximately 3 % on money that we did absolutely nothing to earn (other than get accepted into a college institution)!

One reason that a bond can be significantly less than face value is because people are seeking better investments elsewhere, so for example if a bond doesn't mature for another 10 years, that 20 % increase in face value isn't very attractive when compared to say leaving your money in the stock market for 10 years.

A large portion of your premiums payments will be invested in the insurance company's investment fund in whatever asset class you prefer (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, money market funds, etc.) Over time, this has the chance to generate a much larger cash value in your insurance account than a traditional whole life policy does.

The overall market value of my portfolio is far less concerning to me than how much money is being churned off in tangible cash flow.

The first bone of contention the plaintiffs have is that the company offered the «microscopically low - yielding» Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund, rather than a stable value fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and liquidity without any greater increase in risk compared to money market investmMoney Market Fund, rather than a stable value fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and liquidity without any greater increase in risk compared to money market investMarket Fund, rather than a stable value fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and liquidity without any greater increase in risk compared to money market investmmoney market investmarket investments.

Using the Hueler Index as a benchmark, the plaintiffs claim that by providing participants the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund instead of a stable value fund, the plan sponsor caused the plan, participants and retirees to lose more than $ 41 million in retirement savings from February 2010 through June 30, 2017.

And if your discount is more than 20 % below market value then you will be able to pay off the borrowed money when you refinance and then you will own a property with no money down.

PS — What foes of SFAS 157 are unwilling to admit, is that lenders lent money near the peak of an amazing bull market, and now the collateral values lent against are far less than imagined at the time of lending.

Currently, money market funds hold 16 times more assets than floating - value short - term bond funds despite the bond funds» higher yields, according to the Investment Company Institute, an industry trade group.

In a Feb. 29 letter to shareholders, F. William McNabb, III, Chairman and CEO of Vanguard - which as of that date held more than $ 130 billion of the country's over $ 2 trillion in money market assets - warned of the dangers of floating net asset values.

On page 206 Graham states, «On the whole it may be better for the investor to do his stock buying whenever he has money to put in stocks, EXCEPT when the general market level is much higher than can be justified by well - established standards of value.»

The indicated rates of return (other than for each money market fund) are the historical annual compounded total returns for the period indicated including changes in unit value and reinvestment of distributions.

These bonds are bought by investors on the open market for less than their face value, and the company uses the cash it raises for whatever purpose it wants, before paying off the bondholders at term's end (usually by paying each bond at face value using money from a new package of bonds, in effect «rolling over» the debt to the next cycle, similar to you carrying a balance on your credit card).

This approach generally has been vindicated in the past, as value investors tended to outperform a majority of money managers over full market cycles; and this outperformance has been achieved principally during bear markets, by losing less than most.

The investment manager for the stable value fund invests in a portfolio of intermediate term bonds with an average duration of approximately three to four years that will provide a significantly higher interest rate, or yield, than for example the short - term (average 60 days or less) securities typically held by a money market fund.

According to the compliant, in addition to its fiduciary breach under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Fidelity also attempted to conceal its improperly conservative investment and excessive fees from investors by solely reporting to investors an inappropriate «money market» benchmark for the MIP rather than a proper stable value fund benchmark that made the MIP returns appear to be competitive.

Rather than surrender your life insurance policy for the cash surrender value, there is a market available that allows you to sell your life insurance policy for cash, for potentially greater amounts of money than had you chosen to surrender the policy to the life insurance company.

In the 21st century, in order for financial advisers to think their brilliant money management strategies and tactics have more value than their competition, and therefore the only way they're going to realize their big dream of «getting rich quick on Wall Street,» is to market time with ETFs.

Instead of depositing money into a bank account and getting less than 1 % interest in today's market, you could purchase permanent life insurance for infinite banking THAT IS DESIGNED for rapid cash value accumulation.

(Stable value funds did not exist in the 1979 - 1981 era; perhaps money market yields would have been higher than stable value yields would have been then.

Another way to make money in the market other than value investing is to buy dividend paying secondaries on stocks that have strong income growth.

If shareholders are to make most of their money through earnings growth and / or positive sentiment, then further excess return needs to be demanded to compensate for potential of negative sentiment destroying market value faster than earnings growth can grow against.

If the market expects interest rates at the time the option becomes active to be such that the issuer will exercise its option and call the bond, the option is said to be «in the money,» which can cause the security to trade at a premium to par, or a price higher than the bond's face value.

Cost / Value for Money: 8/10 (15 kg costs # 38 but feed amounts are quite low and need to be when you have a 50 kg dog) Quality of ingredients: 7/10 (I am sure others can comment better than me but The Meat content seems good and is defined and the main cereal is rice, also the oils are chicken / fish) Packaging / Marketing: 5/10 (Difficult one as packaging is very basic which keeps the costs down, but marketing could be better as few have even heard of it and it is by franchised delivery only) Apparent Taste Factor: 7/10 (Seems to be well accepted and eaten happily but has no sugar / Salt so possibly would score lower than some other dry foods) Back End ToleraMarketing: 5/10 (Difficult one as packaging is very basic which keeps the costs down, but marketing could be better as few have even heard of it and it is by franchised delivery only) Apparent Taste Factor: 7/10 (Seems to be well accepted and eaten happily but has no sugar / Salt so possibly would score lower than some other dry foods) Back End Toleramarketing could be better as few have even heard of it and it is by franchised delivery only) Apparent Taste Factor: 7/10 (Seems to be well accepted and eaten happily but has no sugar / Salt so possibly would score lower than some other dry foods) Back End Tolerance: 8/10

Rare are the occasional breeders who manage to sell their puppies are a higher price than market value, and it makes sense, since most of them are not doing it for the money at all.

Another market factor that retailers must keep in mind is that pet owners are not only more educated than ever about their cat food choices, they are also both more discerning and more willing to spend a little extra money on products they perceive to be of high quality and value.

«If the deposit or the purchase price is faked by an artificial value increase, which is not substantiated by the market and if it's a fake flip, then the lender is advancing more money than they otherwise would because they're basing it on an artificially inflated value.»

What I think clients are looking for, is to have an experienced lawyer they can trust, who understands their sector and can help deliver value for money solutions to suit their business needs, rather than what many law firms do in the current market — retro - fit their own resources and cost model to how they deliver service rather than listen to the client and understand what the client actually wants.

Internal rates of return for participating policies may be much worse than universal life and interest - sensitive whole life (whose cash values are invested in the money market and bonds) because their cash values are invested in the life insurance company and its general account, which may be in real estate and the stock market.

Personally, I'd rather keep the life insurance, use the cash values to supplement my investments and / or use the cash value to pay my income in the years the stock market goes down (like 2001, 2008, etc) so that I don't end up worse off than when I began because at the end of the day that account can't lose its value, I can't be sued for the value of it, I don't need to report it on my son's FAFSA form for college, AND if I pull money out of it for my son's school, the dividend still pays the same amount as if I hadn't drawn the money out in the first place (fun fact: that last point isn't something that a northwestern policy does, but new york life and massmutual's contracts do).

However, the amount of money than an insurance company will put forth towards fixing your car will not exceed the current market value of the vehicle.

Instead of depositing money into a bank account and getting less than 1 % interest in today's market, you could purchase permanent life insurance for infinite banking THAT IS DESIGNED for rapid cash value accumulation.