Sentences with phrase «money than risk»

The creditors are willing to accept a reduction as much as 50 - 60 % to collect a debtor's money than risk losing everything if the debtor files bankruptcy.

For a person who is very risk averse but wants to make a little more money than the risk - free rate, the solution is not to invest completely in slightly risky things.

Not exact matches

Alternative ways of raising money are increasingly available, and crowd - funding has for instance raised more than # 1 billion for UK small and medium - sized enterprises last year.Of course, don't forget to inquire about the regulation in place in your country, and get professional advice to mitigate risk.

«I'm not going to be dismissive of the risks, but I think markets have priced them in and if anything as we look at the fundamentals of stock markets around the world, the fundamentals of European equities right now are I think significantly better than they are for the United States,» said the managing partner of Triogem Asset Management and global investing expert on CNBC's «Fast Money.»

Factors are not only putting out more money but are willing to take greater risks than a year ago.

This means that when you start a business, you have a lot more to risk than someone who makes less money and has fewer career options.

«For people who have the risk tolerance, investing that money rather than paying off the mortgage is fine, but think about what would happen if the investments don't pan out and you still have to pay your mortgage,» says Craig Brimhall, vice president of Wealth Strategies at Ameriprise Financial.

When it comes to saving for retirement, we are facing all kinds of risks, from skyrocketing healthcare costs to running out of money because we're living longer than we expected.

So in practice, if you are young software developer or entrepreneur in San Francisco, you can choose to work at a start - up that will have a more than 50 percent chance of going out of business in the next 18 months without risking the embarrassment of running out of money and having to move back in with your parents.

Hence, they are comparatively cautious than their North Indian counterparts who possess the old money cushion that drives bigger bets and larger risks,» states Ashok.

And the risk of losing money also falls less on Mylan than it does on those at the end of the supply chain, with the pharmacy having to dispense EpiPens while accepting less in copay money upfront, then applying for a rebate and waiting to see what trickles back.

Freeman said the risk of money laundering «is far greater in the vast, unregulated, illegal sports betting market than in the highly regulated, legal gaming industry.

While it's better to invest than keep money under a mattress, buying risk free securities, such as guaranteed income certificates or low - yielding government bonds, could actually be riskier than purchasing higher returning products, says Ted Rechtshaffen, president and CEO of Toronto's TriDelta Financial Partners.

Juckes fears a summer of «risk aversion» that would see investors rushing to havens rather than putting their money to more productive uses.

And speaking of inflation, shouldn't the risk for CDs be scored less than 10 because you may lose money to inflation that may not be compensated for with the interest you receive?

He preferred to let financial institutions fail in 2008 rather than risk taxpayer money to rescue them.

Options involve risk, including the possibility that you could lose more money than you invest.

This type of investment isn't as low - risk as say, a bank CD, but it can help you generate some extra money for your retirement fund sooner than you think.

If you start trading too much and risking too much, you will burn all your money and be out of the race quicker than the hare.

Crowdfunding investments can entail greater - than - normal risk of losing all of the money you invest.

Locking money up for a long time period — more than 10 years — is a bad idea because it reduces access to an investment and increases risk, according to many financial advisors.

The above quote talks about how Paul Tudor Jones focuses more on defending his capital and managing risk than on how much money he can make.

It offers the potential to earn more money than, say, a bank certificate of deposit or a money market account, and the index options give the client some flexibility in how much downside risk there will be.

The upside potential will be less than if the money goes into buckets with greater potential risk of loss.

When volatility is average, options prices will typically be a little lower than during a bearish market and that might cause options that are farther out of the money to be priced so low that the risks involved outweigh the profit potential.

Now that I'm older, I'd rather hold on to what I have than taking more risk to make more money.

An investment is a risk: I assumed the risk of losing money was higher than the chance of making it; for that reason, leveraging risk was never part of my strategy.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

Money is put into more than one property to minimize the risk of loss and increase the likelihood of high gains.

We believe in long - term investing, but we don't want to put ourselves in a situation where we take more risk than necessary by having money slated for short - term goals in riskier investments.

Price fluctuations can be violent and it's important that you don't risk inappropriate amounts of money (more than you can afford to lose).

Even though stocks have since more than doubled, the shock of losing half your money in a year and a half might well have taken away some of your appetite for seeking risk.

But for a businessman, who must take risks in order to make money; who will buy nothing without careful, thorough investigation; and who will not risk more than he is able to lose, there is no other investment in the market today as tempting as mining stock.»

Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, gave a speech on 2 March on the future of money and how the UK central bank can help manage the potential risks, as well as realise the promise of, more than a thousand virtual or cryptocurrencies.

Rather than taking their profit money and getting out, Ponzi's victims often reinvested, exposing them to the scheme's risks anew.

But if that trade is unprofitable, the risk is limited since they can not lose more money than set from the start.

Considered to be a higher risk for loss than any other type of investments such as bond funds or money market funds they also have the potential to return the highest potential return in investment.

While you, the investor, are putting your money at risk, the mutual fund company could easily eat away more than 50 % of your profit.

Priorities shift as you get older — hanging on to what you have is more important than risking money in a weak market.

Fidelity ® Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (FCRDX) This fund, whose income is normally exempt from federal income taxes, might be appropriate for investors looking for more yield than money market funds are providing, and wanting to take a more conservative approach to both credit and interest rate risk than many other bond funds.

If you put your money in a FDIC - insured savings account with less than 3 % interest a year, there is 0 risk, but then your money doesn't keep up with inflation.

As you add money to your invested funds over time, your risk gets amplified such that a negative return in later years will cost you more in absolute dollar terms than in earlier years.

You feel smart and willing to risk more than you otherwise would if it was «your money.»

Santi is a risk after his knee injury and with his age (I think Wenger doesn't even give players over 30 more than a one year contract), sell him now and you get some money back wait till next season and you get next to nothing.

I can believe this because I can understand Real wanting to get some money for him rather than risking loosing him for free but then again there was so many rumours in the summer saying it was a done deal when it wasn't, I hope it's true he'd be a great solid DM I just hope he wouldn't get injured as much as he has in the past.

As of Monday, Reilly's investigation had uncovered no evidence of point shaving, but the BC scandal revealed a deep and troubling gambling involvement by team members and served as a warning to all college athletes: When they place a bet with a bookie, they are risking more than money or the possibility that bookies might get their hooks into them.

We will see the true agenda of the board if they're willing to spend and overspend as teams know we are desperate, top top top class players as Wenger calls them will want more money to join us lol I just hope this time next year we will be celebrating rather than risking losing anyone else.

I certainly can't see the Wilpons risking having to spend more money than they have to.

Therefore, if «the stock market crashes or the loan industry bubble bursts», those with capital at risk are more likely to lose money than those who don't have any / many investments, and therefore the line will (likely) move back towards zero.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game