Currently, both bitcoin companies and more traditional
money transmitters need to comply with a complicated network of regulatory regimes in all 50 U.S. states, a pain point that industry advocates have argued severely limits startup growth by increasing the cost of market entrance.
Money transmitter is in fact a technical term used by FINCEN that has a very specific regulatory meaning —
a money transmitter needs to get a money transmitted license.
Not exact matches
He said licensees that want both a BitLicense and a traditional
money -
transmitter license won't have to duplicate the application process, and that there will be no
need to file «suspicious activity reports,» or SARs, when these anti-
money-laundering actions have already been handled by the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN.
I'm sure OP would
need a state
money transmitter's license and / or be registered as a
money service business to be acting legally in this case.
«It just underscores that if you're building a company in this space, you
need to take the Bank Secrecy Act and
money -
transmitter laws very seriously.»
Traditional financial institutions like banks and
money transmitters like Coinbase
need personal information to confirm users» identities so they can comply with KYC and AML regulations under the Patriot Act.
But while the request presents a wide array of policy areas which the initiative could pursue, the IDFPR's guidance document paints a
need to consider a regulatory scheme to bring the state's cryptocurrency market in compliance to
money transmitter requirements.