Sentences with phrase «month contract rather»

Some will even offer a month by month contract rather than signing up for the entire year.

Not exact matches

One example: Large industrial contracts that can take months rather than days or weeks to negotiate.

Tesla also noted that the plaintiff in question was employed by a temp agency, not by Tesla, and wasn't fired but rather saw out the end of his six month contract.

However, the ratio of gold standing for delivery — the process by which a futures contract can be settled for physical gold rather than cash — rose exponentially into early December and has since fallen significantly but remains at historically high levels: The standard COMEX response would be that the overwhelming majority of futures contracts are simply rolled over at expiration into a future month or settled in cash.

Certain fighters may come into fight week heavier than they planned to be months ago when they signed the contract, or if they were say 178 lbs they may feel that it's more advantageous to cut 3 lbs going into the fight rather than fighting at 185.

Supporters moaned about players constantly being offered new contracts when they hadn't earned it and look at the volume of players in the last 18 months of contract with rumors of a rebuild which would mean they could be for sale rather than new contracts.

He has only 15 months left on his contract and like McGuane he may have already decided to move on this summer rather than stagnate on the Arsenal bench.

However, with just months remaining on his contract with Arsenal, a possible Wenger exit could open the door for those two or others to return, but many still have their reservations over whether or not the end of his 20 - year reign is coming sooner rather than later.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

We are all aware that Tomas Rosicky has made it clear that he wants to leave Arsenal so that he can actually play every week rather than sit on the bench, and we also know that Arsene Wenger has upset the Czech international by exercising the club's right to extend his contract by another 12 months, but do we know WHY the 34 year - old wants to leave after so many years of loyal service?

The report lists Manchester United and Inter Milan as among those interested in Ozil, but both clubs would prefer to sign him on a free next summer rather than fork out for a transfer fee just six months before his contract runs out.

Both players are out of contract in 12 months time, and with no progress being made in extension talks, as far as publicly being made available, it looks as though Arsene Wenger could be looking for replacements sooner rather than later.

Alderweireld will be entering the final year of his contract in the summer, and Spurs are open to the possibility of selling him rather than activating a 12 - month extension which would attach a # 25m release clause.

Some rather tenuous reports last week had suggested Klopp was wanted by the Catalan giants to replace Enrique, despite the German being just 18 months into his reign at Anfield and having signed a six - year contract last summer.

Everton decided to cash in on the player with 6 - months left on the contract, rather than losing him for free in the summer.

Slavisa Jokanovic, who secured promotion during his nine months in charge, left in June following a row over an improved contract, so responsibility for assimilating the raft of summer signings into a unified team has fallen to Quique Sanchez Flores — no easy task, given their diverse diverse backgrounds and nationalities, and the fact that they would probably score more points if the game was Scrabble rather than football.

Principals now serving 11 - rather than 12 - month contracts.

And the district plans to expand the program into «original credit» courses — a replacement for regular classes, rather than just a make - up opportunity — under a contract with online curriculum provider APEX Learning that will cost the district about $ 1.2 million for the 18 months ending in June 2011.

(i currently prefer to tether rather than buy a separate contract for a wireless card, mostly bc it's month to month and its convenient using bluetooth tethering)

Granted, KooDoo is just a branch off of its parent company TELUS but it does month to month services rather than requiring a contract.

You're not locked down to a contract and you can pay for your plan month by month, rather than over a two - year period.

I guess this is a way to get T - Mobile customers with older phones to stay and have more reason to stay rather than upgrade their phone for a new 2 year contract when in 9 - 12 more months T - Mobile will be AT&T - Mobile.

Leaked memos say that T - Mobile will only handle «billing, coverage, features and rate plans», rather than the phone itself, providing a 3G option for those who want a contract (from $ 79.99 a month for those paying $ 179 upfront for the handset).

Online phone specialist Mobiles.co.uk is running a rather impressive deal for LG's new Optimus 4X HD, offering the phone on a T - Mobile contract for a rather unbelievable # 15.50 per month.

Another thing to note is that SGX Nifty is a futures contract and hence its movements are more aligned with Nifty Future contract of that specific month rather than Spot price of Nifty.

There's a rather large # 443 to pay upfront, it's then # 25 / mth for the entire 24 - month contract which gets you unlimited minutes and texts as well as 4 GB of data.

Then again, the parties ended up agreeing on a new labor contract less than a month later, so perhaps rather than an imposition of one side's will on the other, there was, after the dust settled, a meeting of the minds.

Rather than receiving $ 500 as a refund for the remaining three months of coverage they opted for, in a short rate cancellation, the amount would be less as stipulated in the contract.

For the 64 GB model it's $ 22.91 a month for 2 years, rather than the regular $ 27.08, which saves you $ 4.17 each month for the life of the contract.

Like other proposed ETFs that have emerged in recent months, ProShares isn't planning to buy direct stakes in the cryptocurrency; rather, it intends to create exposure through derivatives contracts.

The 32 GB model comes with a # 32 per month two year contract with a rather large # 99 upfront fee.

Nodejs Developer — 3 months contract - Wiltshire Please kindly send an up - to - date CV in the first instance rather than calling.

In a commissioning relationships, PHNs are much more closely involved in working with providers to ensure that services are flexible and responsive to community's changing needs, he said, rather than the «old style, set - and - forget contracting where resources are handed out under a contract and you report back every 12 months».

New - home sales and pending existing - home sales both based on contracts rather than closings and thus forward - looking indicators have been trending up modestly in recent months and are now appreciatively higher than they were at their low points in July 2006.

Since I wasn't under contract with them, but rather a month - to - month agreement, they were terminated.