You'll notice that weight loss was more rapid for the first 3
months in the intervention group, and then slowed over time.
Not exact matches
• A randomized controlled trial of a multi component
intervention with expectant fathers
in the US found that, at six
months post partum, almost twice as many
in the
intervention group compared with the controls (16.5 % v. 9.3 %) had stopped smoking.
The program to encourage breastfeeding seemed to work - by three
months out, 43 percent of mothers who gave birth at
intervention hospitals were still exclusively breastfeeding, compared to six percent of women
in the comparison
group.
However, larger socioeconomic inequalities — the higher socioeconomic position, the larger — emerged
in the
intervention group, both for early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding and for weaning before 12
months.
For discontinuing any breastfeeding before 12
months, small socioeconomic gradients
in the control
group were widened
in the
intervention group (RR = 1.04 and 1.16, respectively, for mothers with secondary education or less).
The slope inequality index (SII) of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before 3
months was − 0.12 (95 % CI: − 0.16, − 0.08)
in the
intervention, indicating a 12 % absolute risk reduction from the lowest to the highest education categories, compared with a 3 % reduction
in the corresponding absolute risk reduction (SII: − 0.03, 95 % CI: − 0.06, 0.01)
in the control
group.
Clustering - adjusted relative inequality index (RII) of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before 3
months was 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.74, 0.87)
in the
intervention group, indicating a 20 % relative risk reduction across the entire distribution of maternal education.
In the
intervention group, mothers who had not completed university were also more likely to wean their infants before 12
months than mothers who had, but no dose - response gradient was observed.
In the
intervention group, however, mothers with partial university education showed a 12 % (95 % CI: 1.04, 1.20) higher relative risk of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before 3
months relative to mothers with completed university education (Figure 1a).
for training, practice and reference, December 2007 IBFAN Training Courses on the Code ICAP, 2010 Improving Retention, Adherence, and Psychosocial Support within PMTCT Services: Implementation Workshop for Health Workers IYCN Project, The roles of grandmothers and men: evidence supporting a familyfocused approach to optimal infant and young child nutrition IYCN Project Mother - to - Mother Support
Groups Trainer's Manual - Facilitator's Manual with Discussion Guide IYCN Project, 2010, Infant Feeding and HIV: Trainer's guide and participant's manual for training community - based workers and volunteers IYCN Project 2010, Infant Feeding and HIV: Participant's manual for community - based workers and volunteers IYCN Project, Infant and Young Child Feeding and Gender: A Training Manual for Male
Group Leaders and Participant Manual for Male
Group Leaders IYCN Project 2012, Helping an HIV - positive breastfeeding mother decide how to feed her child at 12
months: A checklist for health care providers IYCN Project 2012, Community
interventions to promote optimal breastfeeding; evidence on early initiation, any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding; literature review, January 2012 UNICEF 2011, Community IYCF Counselling Package - The technical content of this package reflects the Guidelines on HIV and Infant Feeding 2010: Principles and Recommendations for Infant Feeding
in the Context of HIV and a Summary of Evidence related to IYCF
in the context of HIV.
In order to study all aspects related to the topic, we used a reference questionnaire prepared by nutrition and breastfeeding experts, which had been tested, modified and validated two months before our research team1 started the study (following a pilot study conducted on 20 women to determine whether the questions were clear and understandable), and then administered in a standardized fashion to women in both groups (intervention group and control group
In order to study all aspects related to the topic, we used a reference questionnaire prepared by nutrition and breastfeeding experts, which had been tested, modified and validated two
months before our research team1 started the study (following a pilot study conducted on 20 women to determine whether the questions were clear and understandable), and then administered
in a standardized fashion to women in both groups (intervention group and control group
in a standardized fashion to women
in both groups (intervention group and control group
in both
groups (
intervention group and control
group).
For instance, the study of Mattar et al. revealed a marginal increase
in EB at six
months after delivery among the
group which received a prenatal educational
intervention highlighting the benefits as well as the management of breastfeeding issues as the main content of the educational material (booklet), video, coaching session and counselling, compared to the
group receiving only the booklet and the video, and the one recipient of only routine prenatal care, concluding that that educational material alone
in the prenatal period is not enough and that specific prenatal education that addresses breastfeeding following a single meeting through counselling can significantly improve
However, a higher percentage of mothers
in the
intervention group exclusively breastfed their babies until the age of 6
months, compared to the control
group, that is, 107/194 (55.2 %) against 69/178 (38.8 %) with a statistically very significant difference of p = 0.002, which proved that the educational booklet has a positive impact on the duration of EB.
The analysis of Table 3, representing the distribution of breastfeeding women followed according to the practice of EB over time
in the two
groups, showed that the continuation of EB until the age of 6
months was significantly high among mothers
in the
intervention group compared to the control
group (55.2 % against 38.8 %, p = 0.002).
A higher percentage of mothers
in the
intervention group exclusively breastfed their babies up to the age of six
months compared to the control
group, 55.2 % against 38.8 % (p = 0.002).
Among the women who had reported difficulties with lactation
in the
intervention and control
groups (96 [69 %] and 89 [64 %], respectively), the prevalence of full breastfeeding at 6
months was 24 % and 4.5 %, respectively.
The prevalence of any breastfeeding at 12
months was 27 (19 %) and 16 (11 %)
in the
intervention and
in the control
groups, respectively (P =.09; Table 3).
At 4
months of age, based on since birth recall, the breastfeeding proportion was significantly higher
in the
intervention group than
in control
group (20.6 %
in the
intervention group vs. 11.3 %
in the control
group, p < 0.01).
Among the women
in the
intervention group who reported problems, the frequency of full breastfeeding at 6
months was 23 (24 %) of 96 and was significantly higher compared with control
group (4 [4.5 %] of 89; P <.001; Table 4).
Women
in the
intervention group reported outcomes at scheduled interviews, whereas the control
group were interviewed at 6
months postpartum only.
Interviewers, who were not involved
in the
intervention process and who were blinded to the
group to which the children belonged, conducted home visits at 6 and 12
months in order to collect data on the study variables.
Primary: percentage difference
in 6 -
month breastfeeding exclusivity rates between the
intervention and control
groups
Outcome data were collected at 4
months, but it is likely that there may have been recall bias for some outcomes, e.g. breast engorgement — women
in the
intervention groups would have discussed this and maybe it was recorded at the time it occurred, women
in the control
group would not have been asked until 4
months postpartum.
For cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at up to six
months face - to - face
interventions may be associated with greater effects than other types of support; however, very high within -
group heterogeneity remains
in the analysis, and we advise caution when interpreting this result (test for subgroup differences: Chi ² = 37.55, df = 2 (P <.00001, I ² = 94.7 %; Analysis 3.2).
Intervention: a community - based worker carrying out 2 activities: 1) 1 home visit to all pregnant women
in the third trimester, followed by subsequent monthly home visits to all infants aged 0 — 24
months to support appropriate feeding, infection control, and care - giving; 2) a monthly women's
group meeting using participatory learning and action to catalyse individual and community action for maternal and child health and nutrition.
Those who do attend tend to stay
in their
groups for many
months in what feels less like early
intervention and more like state - sponsored coffee shop.
In the
intervention group, parenting skills as well as the child's disruptive behaviour, ADHD symptoms, anxiety, sleep problems and empathy improved significantly when compared with the control
group and the results were permanent throughout the 12 -
month follow - up.
After 12
months, the average systolic blood pressure decreased
in both
groups, but was lower
in the
intervention group (128.2 / 73.8 mm Hg vs 137.8 / 76.3 mm Hg).
(1)
In this study — the LIFEstyle study performed in the Netherlands — 290 women were assigned to a 6 - month lifestyle - intervention programme preceding 18 months of infertility treatment (intervention group) while 287 women were assigned to prompt infertility treatment over the same 24 month study period (control group
In this study — the LIFEstyle study performed
in the Netherlands — 290 women were assigned to a 6 - month lifestyle - intervention programme preceding 18 months of infertility treatment (intervention group) while 287 women were assigned to prompt infertility treatment over the same 24 month study period (control group
in the Netherlands — 290 women were assigned to a 6 -
month lifestyle -
intervention programme preceding 18
months of infertility treatment (
intervention group) while 287 women were assigned to prompt infertility treatment over the same 24
month study period (control
group).
After one
month, participants
in the
intervention group sat down for 71 minutes less
in an 8 hour work day than the control
group.
During this post-
intervention period, children
in the ESDM
group were found to receive fewer hours of service per
month than the children who received early
intervention services typically - available
in the community (168 vs. 257).
This took place with the aid of a standardized questionnaire (on the basis of a Social Responsiveness Scale — SRS),
in which 65 behaviour patterns were evaluated by the parents before the start of
group therapy, at the end of the
intervention as well as three
months after the end of the
intervention in order to measure stability.
The exercise and diet
group saw gains
in mobility and muscle strength and decreases
in fat mass three
months after the
intervention, while those three measures moved
in the opposite, undesirable, direction for the other
group of men.
Despite the worse status of the
intervention group at baseline, the study showed a trend for improvement
in quality of life at three
months and clinically meaningful improvement at four
months.
Quality of life was significantly higher
in participants randomized to the
intervention group, who demonstrated a statistically and clinically meaningful increase
in QOL at 12 weeks (P <.05 using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test).31, 32 Median survival was almost 5
months longer
in the
intervention group.
In addition, participants randomized to the intervention group in our study lived 4.9 months longer than those in usual care, although this difference was not statistically significant because of the heterogeneity of survival among our participant
In addition, participants randomized to the
intervention group in our study lived 4.9 months longer than those in usual care, although this difference was not statistically significant because of the heterogeneity of survival among our participant
in our study lived 4.9
months longer than those
in usual care, although this difference was not statistically significant because of the heterogeneity of survival among our participant
in usual care, although this difference was not statistically significant because of the heterogeneity of survival among our participants.
The result: That one year of therapy and stress reduction (weekly sessions for four
months and monthly sessions for eight
months) was linked to improved survival 11 years later
in the
intervention group, the researchers write
in the December 15 issue of Cancer, an American Cancer Society journal.
Biomarkers for the participants
in each
group were measured at 3
months and 6
months, and 70 % of the
intervention participants were followed up after 12
months.
Seven people
in the
intervention group were living with type 2 diabetes, all of which experienced a reduction
in A1c values (a marker of 3 -
month average blood glucose), and half of them discontinued all medications.
Picture Fit discussed Low - Carb vs Low - Fat Diets for Weight Loss, presenting a research observing a low carb
group vs low fat
group in a 12
month intervention and the results of the
intervention.
Participants
in the two
intervention groups were encouraged to lose 5 % of their baseline weight within 6
months and to maintain the reduced weight until the end of the study.
During
months 7 to 24, participants
in the standard
intervention group self - reported their daily intake using a website designed for this study, and this information was available to the staff during the
intervention telephone contacts.
In the
intervention group, 45 subjects followed a very low - calorie KD for one
month, followed by a 5 -
month standard low - calorie diet.
The trial was delivered by researchers from the University of Bristol and Harvard University and independent evaluators from Queen's University Belfast found that pupils receiving the
intervention made an additional
month's progress
in maths compared with a similar
group whose parents didn't get the texts.
During the
intervention phases, participants
in the incentive
group could earn a reward for adapting their driving behavior (a discount on their insurance premium of maximally 50 Euro per
month), and received feedback on their driving behavior via a custom webpage.
A total of 2,026 women had data at the 12 -
month follow - up: 1,018
in the
intervention group and 1,008
in the usual - care
group.
Results of generalized estimation equation analyses indicate that adolescents
in the HIV risk - reduction
group were less likely to report having had sexual intercourse
in the past 3
months during follow - up (OR, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.46 - 0.96) than were those
in the health - promotion
intervention.
For example, among participants who were sexually experienced at baseline, those
in the 12 - hour combined abstinence and safer - sex
intervention reported less sexual intercourse
in the previous 3
months at the 6 -, 12 -, 18 - and 24 -
month follow - up than the control
group.
In a subgroup analysis, non-depressed patients in the intervention group had less suicidal ideation than non-depressed patients in the control group at 2 and 6 months follow up (p < 0.01
In a subgroup analysis, non-depressed patients
in the intervention group had less suicidal ideation than non-depressed patients in the control group at 2 and 6 months follow up (p < 0.01
in the
intervention group had less suicidal ideation than non-depressed patients
in the control group at 2 and 6 months follow up (p < 0.01
in the control
group at 2 and 6
months follow up (p < 0.01).
The ANCOVA analyses (table 2) indicated that the parents
in the
intervention group had improved their mental health more than the parents
in the control
group 2
months after the
intervention (95 % CI, 2.02 to 5.18).