Failure to do this will result in the loss of
moral authority from your team.
This blog has pointed out, however, that environmentalism is at least as much an attempt to circumnavigate problems of democratic legitimacy as it is a response to environmental problems — that it is easier to take
moral authority from scientific experts than it is to elicit from the governed the consent to govern in lieu of a convincing argument.
This is a question Garvey does not seem to ask nor answer, yet wants to draw
moral authority from, as though it had been answered.
Not exact matches
Maybe when Christians stop toting themselves as the
moral authority on EVERYTHING and keep their noses out of peoples personal lives AND stop trying to keep taxpaying American citizens
from having rights (ie gays)... maybe then they will come into less ridicule.
But the task of preserving even our
moral floor is complicated by the determination of many that «we» should have free and full access to the remissive power of Christian forgiveness without any of the interdictory
authority of biblical faith — even if this means that this power can only be «pried
from God's clutches» by corrupting it, on at least some important occasions, into nihlistic nonjudgmentalism.
When you believe that your mind is all you need to know right
from wrong, you are establishing yourself as the
moral authority, and neglecting the notion that others may disagree with you.
«The
moral we should draw
from the European past, and in particular
from Christianity, is not instruction about the
authority under which we should live, but suggestions about how to make ourselves wonderfully different
from anything that has been.»
The Church has
authority from Jesus to «bind and loose» disciplines which govern the public religious practice of the God's people on earth — this is not the same as the Divine Law of God's Word and natural
moral law.
But some religiously orthodox wedding vendors are finding themselves compelled by the civil
authorities to affirm an answer to that question that violates their religious convictions on the subject, and some religious institutions —
from universities to social service agencies to private companies owned by orthodox believers — are finding themselves forced to take part in the enactment and enforcement of a
moral code they are obliged to reject.
Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial of the transcendence of God, the Divinity of Christ, the historical objectivity of revelation and the
authority of the Church in matters of faith and
morals, and also the denial of the spiritual soul as a principle of existence that is distinct
from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human nature.
Sure, the church you attend... whatever,... but the religion you believe in teaches right
from wrong and claims a connection to, or understanding of, or words directly
from, the supposed ultimate
moral authority does it not?
We send our sons and daughters to suit up for armed services to defend the U. S. of A. or other defenseless countries
from the influences and ravages of
moral depravity (wickedness); or our civil
authorities who, by God's design, arm themselves daily to keep order and peace, to avenge and bring retribution to wrongdoers (Rom.
Once God has ceased to exist in human experience as the omnipotent and numinous Lord, there perishes with him every
moral imperative addressed to man
from a beyond, and humanity ceases to be imprisoned by an obedience to an external will or
authority.
Only the federal government, in Stern's view, has the resources and the
moral authority to protect us
from the violent enmity of the radical right.
I think it is important to note that atheists do not have a source or
authority or book
from which they derive their
moral rules or guidelines.
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking
from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public
authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of
moral clarity about them).
The ecclesial reality of the Church is intricately interwoven with its life as a
moral community — it has to constantly test its
authority to be the
moral voice in the world against its ability to respond with courage and conviction to the voices of the excluded, the voices
from the margins.
«6 Such a God is the author, or the excuse for «the alien power of the
moral imperative» which is «addressed to man
from a beyond» and imprisons him «by an obedience to an external will or
authority.
From what position of
moral authority does Mr. Balmer cast judgement on Mr. Graham's integrity?
It begins where women in theology attempt to deconstruct basic ethical principles such as «the common good» and «the question of
moral power and
authority,» but
from there it moves to the creative impulses we see around us, as women in faith and faithfulness reconstruct the future image and face of the Church as a «community of Christ, bought with a price, where everyone is welcome, «14 as Letty Russell describes it.
The beginning of the exercise of parental
authority is precisely that: the father's recognition that he has a
moral obligation to inculcate in his son the habits of prudence and obedience, and thus to protect his son (and the rest of the family, and possibly the neighborhood)
from the boy's own childish irresponsibility.
In our generation there is danger and hope — danger that these noncognitive accouterments will lose their aesthetic harmony and hypnotic power when integrated with the basic prehensions of science, and be reverted into impotent and empty symbols, jarring, ugly, and without force in final satisfactions: hope that the power of Jesus as lure will reassert itself in an aesthetic context devoid of supernaturalism, a context such that (the language now picks up echoes of van Buren) the vision of Jesus, the free man, free
from authority, free
from fear, «free to give himself to others, whoever they were «1 — such that this vision in its earthly, human purity will lure our aims to a harmonious concrescence, integrating scientific insight and
moral vision and producing a modern, intensely fulfilling human satisfaction.
If the wartime Vatican had taken a
moral stand against Nazism, the outcome might or might not have been different; the Church might have emerged
from the war with the
moral authority to stand against the secular tide that has swamped it.
Pursued with the right kind of arguments and with sufficient vigor, an escape
from the «exemptions ghetto» can bring us out into an open field of religious freedom in full — and of
moral freedom in full for all, thanks to the indispensable leadership role of religious conscience, and the recognition of the duty of men and women to obey God before any
authority of the state.
But is this
moral authority exercised in a manner that alienates students
from American life and prevents them
from becoming loyal American citizens?
The period which spawns a Great Awakening is a time when the realities of life in society have deviated so far
from their
moral and religious understandings that the
authority of the old institutions are questioned.
Freedom
from the
authority of specific norms, and
from a sense of coercion in following them, leads to
moral anarchy and finally degeneracy.
The natural law is a body of unchanging
moral principles known not
from revelation (though parallel to it) but by reason, principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct: to speak in this way of «the humanisation of sexuality» is simply the understanding of the natural law in particular human circumstances: there is no movement away
from natural law - say, to revelation or ecclesial
authority; we are stillwithin its ambit.
Definitions Exousia: (Strong's Greek - Bible Hub.com)(a) power,
authority, weight, especially:
moral authority, influence, (b) in a quasi-personal sense, derived
from later Judaism, of a spiritual power, and hence of an earthly power.
Simply put, there is no neutral ground
from which humans form
moral and political judgments because such decisions embody an embrace of this
authority or that
authority.
This
authority of the electronic image poses ethical and
moral problems of profound dimension because of its divorce
from the language base of all ethical traditions, which flow
from spoken oral traditions and written canons,
from the Pentateuch to the Analects..
But so too did the repressive authoritarianism of post-Tridentine Catholicism, the emergence of a Catholic ecclesiology inimical to true communitas by its overemphasis on clerical power and centralized
authority, and the acceptance into Catholic theology, philosophy, and anthropology of a dualistic Cartesianism every bit as inimical to the medieval intellectual and
moral synthesis (if such a thing can be said to have existed) as anything that emerged
from Wittenberg or Geneva.
Throughout the address Reagan's
moral emphasis remains on the negative liberty of modern individualism as it derives
from and applies to our economic activities, not on republican justice or biblical
authority.
Even for the Catholic the road
from the general principles of Christian ethics to concrete decision has become considerably longer than formerly, even when he is determined unconditionally to respect all those principles, and for a good part of the way, in the last decisive stages of the formation of the concrete
moral imperative, he is therefore inevitably left by the Church's teaching and pastoral
authority more than formerly to his own conscience, to form the concrete decision independently on his own responsibility.
The consequences of David's behavior on his family demonstrated the veracity of Nathan's
moral authority and lessons to be learned
from that.
It met in the Vatican in 1869 - 1870, and its most notable decrees, later promulgated by the Pope, declared «that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic
authority, he defines a doctrine of faith and
morals to be held by the universal Church, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that His Church should be possessed for defining doctrine regarding faith or
morals; and that therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of themselves, and not
from the consent of the Church»; and that the Roman Pontiff has «full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which belong to faith and
morals, but also in those which relate to the discipline and government of the Church spread throughout the world.»
Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise
authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and
morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated
from the State and the State
from the Church; that
moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»
It would be unfair to draw wholesale conclusions about his understanding of the
moral authority that inheres in law
from a book review, but he apparently holds the view that conscientious reflection on enhanced interrogation need consult neither norms of international law nor codes of professional conduct.
The atheist by saying condecending crap like «atheists don't claim to have ultimate
moral authority over other people
from a magical man in the sky, while Christians do.»
Here I am working for the only man with the power and
moral authority to draw me
from the newsroom to the presidential villa.
The Port
Authority has a «
moral obligation» to honor its promises to 9/11 heroes who risked their lives rescuing a paralyzed co-worker
from one of the crumbling Twin Towers, Schumer said.
However, given that there has been a change in recognised
moral authority away
from religion and towards secular influences, the question arises as to when a government is going to realise this change and accept the implications for public policy.
Only with MPs»
moral authority restored can they get on with the much more important work of saving Britain
from fiscal crisis.
Even children who are four years old spontaneously help others with no apparent concern for approval
from friends and / or
authority figures, personal benefits, or
moral (good / bad) imperatives.
Over the years Haidt and his University of Virginia colleague Jesse Graham have surveyed the
moral opinions of more than 110,000 people
from dozens of countries and have found this consistent difference: self - reported liberals are high on 1 and 2 (harm / care and fairness / reciprocity) but are low on 3, 4 and 5 (ingroup / loyalty,
authority / respect and purity / sanctity), whereas self - reported conservatives are roughly equal on all five dimensions, although they place slightly less emphasis on 1 and 2 than liberals do.
In light of the tremendous public funding and strong support for vaccines
from state and federal
authorities, it is not clear whether immunization programs have a
moral obligation to screen for genetic risk factors, even if screening is not cost - effective.
The product of decades of reflection on issues of
authority, inequality, and injustice, this volume analyzes fluctuating
moral beliefs and behavior in political and economic affairs at different points in history,
from the early Middle Ages in England to the prospects for liberalism under twentieth - century Soviet socialism.
From where you stand, does allowing the EPA to have the
authority to regulate GHG emissions as dangerous pollutants constitute «
moral absolutism?»
Marc Morano travels to Vatican City, Italy, with Christopher Monckton and Calvin Beisner of the Cornwall Alliance, for a press event hosted by the Heartland Institute in order to «dissuade Pope Francis
from lending his
moral authority to the politicized and unscientific climate agenda of the United Nations,» according to a Heartland Institute press release.
«For these people who feel so passionately about this, their ultimate
authority is a report
from a group of scientists, and they're saying «this is where we stand, forget about our
moral concerns, forget about our ethical positions, forget about whether we are Right, Left or centre, forget about whether we are Christians or Buddists, no, none of that matters.»