Rounding out the remainder of this Oylmpian ensemble is the always authentic Margo Martindale as Violet's salt - of - the - earth but nonetheless hostile sister Mattie Fae, her stunted, unloved son «Little Charles» heartbreakingly played by Benedict Cumberbatch whose slightly askew features seem evidence of the emotional battering he's taken, and finally Oscar winner Chris Cooper, as Mattie Fae's husband Charles,
the moral center of this family and this drama, who balances his performance with equal parts heart and soul, laced with sly humor, tenderness, and unsparing truth telling when nothing else will do.
Not exact matches
Eggers is questioning the structure
of family, the roles
of each individual
family member and the way religion can provide a
moral center and ground a person's focus and yet still be a weakness.
The
moral quandary at the
center of the film may not be an original one — Danish commander Claus Pedersen (Pilou Asbæk) must go to court over a split - second decision made during a firefight in which his actions saved a comrade while unknowingly leading to a number
of civilian casualties — but Lindholm takes seemingly ages to get to that point, allowing the audience to soak in the monotony and incessant - if - buried burden
of Pedersen's position: serving as ersatz father for his unit while knowing, intuitively, that his
family desperately needs him back home.
Center for the 4th and 5th Rs Founded by education professor, psychologist and CEP Board member Dr. Thomas Lickona, the
Center is a part
of the State University
of New York at Cortland and aims to promote the development
of moral and performance character in schools,
families, and communities.
Center for the 4th and 5th Rs Founded by education professor, psychologist and Character.org Board member Dr. Thomas Lickona, the
Center is a part
of the State University
of New York at Cortland and aims to promote the development
of moral and performance character in schools,
families, and communities.
In 1971, President Richard M. Nixon vetoed a bill that would have underwritten child care for everyone, arguing that the bill «would commit the vast
moral authority
of the national government to the side
of communal approaches to child rearing over against the
family -
centered approach.»