Unlike Fallout 3 and Mass Effect, the moral choices didn't seem to alter how anyone saw or approached Aloy.
«Renegade»
moral choices did have a cathartic flair their «Paragon» counterparts lacked, but that alone couldn't explain why the story, the characters, even the most mundane conversations seemed were so much more engaging than I remembered.
Not exact matches
2) Make it clear in public that if you don't like the rock and roll, there are plenty of other churches, with hints that this decision is a
moral choice which reflects badly on you, not the community.
What sets us apart is that we
do have the POTENTIAL to make conscious behavioral
moral choices and are not totally at the mercy of our subconscious instinctive impulses.
Back some of these people into a corner with a
moral dilemma with limited
choices and I think its fair to question whether or not they will act something like the Christian husband
did in that movie.
Someone who is a tyrants and terrorists who
does not agree with them and wants them to be silent is a person who limits rights,
choices, says what's
moral and who and how to prey is what were against.
If we out right refuse to limit your rights, make laws to take away
choices and push what we feel is
moral on to you, why can't you
do the same for us?
I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it,
DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see.
DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it,
DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see.
DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my
moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray
choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...
In last fall's presidential election pro-life voters were faced with a difficult
moral choice emblematic of the politics of abortion in general:
Does moral principle demand a vote for a marginally pro-life candidate with a chance of winning, or does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life
Does moral principle demand a vote for a marginally pro-life candidate with a chance of winning, or
does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life
does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life....
Much of these early meetings were taken up with the men testing one another — and finding themselves wanting — by virtually impossible
moral choices: «If you had to kill someone again in order to survive, would you
do it?
Many «real» Christians
do not share his bigoted views about something science has PROVEN is not a
moral choice.
I personally never consider religion or atheist or secularism when making a
moral choice, and I am certainly not trying to prove I don't need religion to be a good person.
ONLY American Fundamentalism
does the disbelief as
moral choice thing.
Someone with blond hair or dark skin doesn't choose to be that way, they just are, its a programming issue, not a
moral choice.
But apparently it's a country where good
moral people can be manipulated by self - serving politicians into being distracted from the larger issues by high - school debate questions like «when
does life begin» or «should gays marry,» or even «is being gay a
choice.»
The other draft had been sponsored by German cardinal Julius Doepfner; it represented a grave misreading of what God had inscribed in human sexuality «in the beginning,» the Cracovians believed, and
did so in a way that emptied individual
choices and acts of their
moral significance.
But since de Bruyn doesn't evaluate the
moral, political, and spiritual content of Burke's
choice - a content we could assess for its continuing merit today - the «polite society» defended by Burke seems hardly preferable to the cultural decay he feared.
In this sense, Christianity doesn't have a
moral system, one that can prepare individuals to determine what the
moral choice is for themselves.
We can not help feeling many of the things we feel, but we
do have a
choice as to whether to give this feeling our
moral approbation or not.
Better still, taking into account your position that God can
do as God pleases and such
choices are beyond mortal
moral criticism, just cut to the chase and tell us when it is and when it isn't morally acceptable to slaughter children and infants should one be faced with such a perceived divine command?
Putting the
moral judgment of «Suicide is the wrong
choice» doesn't take a step toward understanding others.
Only where consciousness eventuates in self - awareness and self - awareness comes to include awareness of a choosing among alternatives
do we arrive at clear instances of
moral choice.
, Well, if I'm wrong, I will know I made the
moral choice, since I would refuse to worship a deity that is full of such cruelty, jealousy and hatred even if he
did exist.
And it has everything to
do, I suggest, with four themes that arise from the modern expression of Ockhamite nominalism: the deterioration of the idea of freedom into willfulness, the detachment of freedom from
moral truth, an obsession with «
choice,» and the consequent inability to draw the most elementary
moral conclusions about the imperative to resist evil.
Given the variable ways that mental illness may impact an individual's functioning, it is important to understand that the mere presence of serious mental illness
does not necessarily imply that it has compromised a person's ability to make
moral choices.
For a particular behavior to be considered evil, the person committing the act must be in a position to knowingly make a
moral choice between
doing something wrong and
doing something right, choosing the bad action over the good.
Sadly, the Canadian Supreme Court and Parliament made assisted suicide into a «right,» and in so
doing imposed the
moral philosophy of liberalism — free
choice limited only by the prohibition against harming others — on everyone.
(a) It completely
does away with any Christian doctrine of sin, for sin is no longer the result of a
moral choice made in rebellion against God by the mind and the heart of man; sin is simply a physical principle in matter and in all that is composed of matter.
As Goldstein shows, he was not sure that this issue posed the same kind of clear
moral choice that racism and segregation
did.
most importantly how
do we
do these without messing with the team
moral which we also need to improve simultaneously while getting kronke and his boy wenger out... its not going to be easy but we don't have another
choice, we can't wait for dangote or some miracle to come help..
Although preschoolers aren't making life - altering life decisions, they
do make small
moral choices every day.
There are so many
moral choices moms have to make regarding reproduction and parenting that if one mom says she doesn't want to have children because of past trauma, it's best to support her decision, whether you agree or disagree with her principles.
We never committed to one single particular book on sleep habits either — like you, I was somewhat overwhelmed by all the
choices (and the LENGTH, I mean, if my kid isn't sleeping, I probably don't have the time, energy or focus to devote to a 700 - page tome ABOUT SLEEPING), and found that too many authors turned sleep into a
moral high ground.
As a disclaimer, I tend to believe that circumcision is a personal (and not
moral)
choice and
do not condemn or condone anyone for making whatever decision they think is best.
This matters greatly because it affects what we think is possible and reasonable to
do to a person / body, and therefore has deep consequences for the
moral and ethical dimensions of our
choices in life.
So are today's scientists expected to spend as much time agonising over their
moral choices as they
do on experiments, or
do they take ethics in their stride?
So, one of the things I wondered about was, How
do doctors actually make
moral choices?
But the more we talked about our food
choices, the more I wondered: When
did eating become such a
moral judgment call?
I'm not going to lecture you on your
moral choice, except to point out that you
did actually make one.
In an age where anti-heroes dominate especially the television landscape — recent hit series like AMC's «Breaking Bad» and «Mad Men» and HBO's «Game of Thrones» center on people of ambiguous
morals forced to make difficult
choices — «Bridge» centers on a person determined to
do what is right.
Hercules
does deserve a pat on his impenetrable leather armor for making good
moral and ethical
choices that require sacrifice.
I won't give anything away, but the finale presents a
moral choice, and unless you are watching the movie by yourself, you'll find yourself discussing the ending with those around you, asking each other, «What would you have
done?»
It is true that religious and
moral values play important roles in the current system and would continue to
do so under a system of expanded
choice.
It's what helps them navigate through the ethical challenges and pressures they will inevitably face throughout life and make the right
moral choices so they
do act right, with or without adult guidance.
As with Alejandra, for most children Hussar studied, the decision has more to
do with
morals than with personal
choice.
Conservatives support «
choice» not merely as a tool to coax better outcomes but as a
moral framework that
does not depend on any empirical outcome.
How
do we guide students to think more deeply about the
moral considerations people made in their
choice to support the institution of slavery?
But he
did say that low - income children in communities thats many wealthier families have abandoned have the
moral and education right to some forms of appropriate
choice:
It doesn't even mean that every debate involves
moral considerations; this is certainly true when it comes to discussions over what policies will be most - effective in expanding
choice or improving teacher quality.
By teaching students to think critically, empathize, recognize
moral choices, and make their voices heard, Facing History puts in their hands the possibility — and the responsibility — to
do the serious work demanded of us all as citizens.