Watch video and learn about the moral principle, respect the religious beliefs of others, from The Way to Happiness
moral code book, based on common sense.
Not exact matches
If you can't judge the bible or any
book on wether it actually is a valid
moral code, you are IMMORAL as you have NO
MORALS.
Some how it's felt that values,
morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy
books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the
code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!
By this we do not mean just the temporal development that historical criticism discerns in the redaction of these
codes, the evolution of
moral ideas that may be traced out from the first Decalogue to the Law of the Covenant, on the one hand, and from the Decalogue itself through the restatements and amplifications of the
book of Deuteronomy to the new synthesis of the «Holiness
Code» in the
book of Leviticus and the legislation subsequent to Ezra, on the other; more important than this development of the content of the Law is the transformation in the relationship between the faithful believer and the Law.
But, keep your
moral code out of my law
book.
Most atheists / agnostics / humanists try to define God's
moral code in their terms, in essence, to re-write the
book of life to suit their agenda, when in fact, only one agenda counts - GOD»S.
It would be unfair to draw wholesale conclusions about his understanding of the
moral authority that inheres in law from a
book review, but he apparently holds the view that conscientious reflection on enhanced interrogation need consult neither norms of international law nor
codes of professional conduct.
TV shows,
books, or video games that violate
moral codes without teaching a lesson may have a negative influence on your child.
Mindor, a
book that pays particular attention to Luke's
moral code and insistence upon accountability, has excellent character work and prose that's lush without being florid.
The idea of stealing another writer's words or trying to discredit them or falsifying reviews or trying to have people write fake reviews of my work sounds crazy to me, but I am guilty of highlighting the parts of the PW review that I liked most about my most recent
book; it was a mixed review bc the reviewer thought the novel had too many coincidences / was too neatly wrapped up at the end, but that's one of my signatures, I think, now that I've written three
books, two published, and one in the works, so I'm actually proud of the strange kismet, sometimes magical occurrences that happen in my work because they also happen in my life, and that's what this whole post is about: about being true to oneself, which includes a
moral code, a writers and human
code of ethics.