Not exact matches
The
debate on the final statement concerning the war — which took nearly all the time allotted for discussion of public
issues — saw the Assembly initially adopt a repudiation of the Christian
moral tradition that justifies the use of force in «last resort» circumstances in favor of a pacifist approach.
Moreover, the period precipitated the deep polarization of the middle classes
on social and
moral issues that has defined subsequent religious and political
debate.
We could call this problem the «legalization» of
debate, meaning not whether something is legal, but instead the conversion of
moral, social, religious, and other dimensions of an
issue into legal, or legalistic, terms, or at least the neglect of them because of a focus
on what the judges will say.
Instead of working to achieve consensus
on contested theological and
moral issues, legislatively driven agendas are designed to end
debates by reducing the
issue to two sides and then enacting one side into church policy and ecclesiastical law.
In September, Time magazine organized a
debate between Collins and Dawkins which touched
on all the crucial
issues: the false idea that science and faith should be held as not overlapping; the place of Darwinian evolution in the plan of God; the fine - tuning of the physical constants of nature; the literal interpretation of Genesis; the place of miracles including the incarnation and the resurrection of Jesus; and the origin of the
moral law within the human heart.
We criticize movies
on A.I., like last year's release Ex Machina, we
debate ethical and
moral issues, we challenge them to design and program their own intelligent system.
Centered
on moral dilemmas regarding racism and how to both study and teach sensitivity to the
issue, the conversation — while lively and intellectually challenging — seemed, like many
debates on morality, only to result in even more possible responses to some of the complexities Minow raised.
And the other great
moral and political questions of the great
debate on salt and iron — the need for profits, the rights and obligations of nobility, aid to the poor, the importance of a balanced budget, the appropriate tax burden, the risk of anarchy, and the dividing line between rule of law and tyranny — have all remained unresolved
issues.
The heart of this novel also concerns a pressing
moral issue, one I will not comment
on nor state which side of the
debate I would be
on.
Rather than deal with the
issue head
on, the libtard's easy option is to apply a label, thereby securing an imagined
moral superiority which obviates the need for further
debate.
Although there is growing acceptance that the
issues issue being
debated in Copenhagen must be understood as raising profound
moral and ethical
issues, it is clear that some parties continue to base their decisions
on national economic interest.
[66] Talk of «practical reconciliation» asserts
moral authority to shut down
debate about the importance of proceeding to address disadvantage
on the basis of rights by presenting them as something that are merely desirable or aspirational, but not connected to the real
issues at hand.