He recognizes that the courts might be pressed again to defer to military decision - making («I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review that seems to me wholly delusive») and proposes that the chief constraint against this unconstitutional action is the executive's «responsibility to the political judgments of their contemporaries and to
the moral judgments of history.»
Not exact matches
«From this
history of the Bible in early American
history,» Noll writes in his concluding chapter, «the
moral judgment that makes the most sense to me rests on a difference between Scripture for oneself and Scripture for others.»
For if he had truly grasped the position Arkes defends he would understand that his own
judgment — that Arkes is mistaken at points — is itself dependent on
moral notions not contingent upon relative circumstances or the contingencies
of history.
He begins by presenting a novel, brief
history of arguments in analytic philosophy between
moral realism (the view that
moral properties are objectively real) and
moral expressivism (the view that
moral judgments are subjective expressions).
How is the author to avoid moralizing, biased
judgments or, perhaps worse, a simple reading
of history as
moral progress or
moral decline?
Then there came the Clinton years, the years when America took something
of a holiday from
history» and from serious thought about the relation between ideals and realities,
moral norms and prudential
judgments, in formulating and executing foreign policy.
In
history man meets himself, and in his encounter with
history he encounters again, magnified into superhuman proportions, the fallibility
of his intellectual understanding and
moral judgment that prevents him from completely understanding and adequately judging both
history and himself.
In it are involved the nature
of their God, his relation to them and to the stream
of history, the framework within which they conceived their
moral obligation, the grounds
of divine
judgment, and the hope
of salvation which was to grow into the expectancy
of the promised Messiah and the kingdom
of God.
Reading his lively account
of the scholars who excavate and display the Middle Ages, an account replete with cultural
history,
moral judgment, psychological speculation, gossip, and no small amount
of romantic idealism and fin - de-siecle pathos, the reader can reflect as much upon his own world, and about the character
of Cantor himself, as he does about the painstaking task
of historical reconstruction that absorbed the lives
of such as Theodor Mommsen, Marc Bloch, or David Knowles.
The
judgment is not a result
of the automatic action
of some mechanism built into the
moral structure
of things, but comes directly and personally from Yahweh himself, whose life and power are thus apprehended primarily in
history.
Although the
moral standards and ethical
judgments of this country have long been permeated by Christian teaching, there is a widespread ignorance both
of the actual
history of the Christian Faith and
of its revolutionary character.