«The family has the most potential of any institution for shaping the spiritual and
moral lives of children.»
As Paul Vitz has observed, «The name «values clarification» is gone» but the same self - oriented moral relativism, under other names, continues to undermine
the moral life of our children.»
Not exact matches
The aggregate
of all our joys and sufferings, thousands
of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer
of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful
child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher
of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history
of our species,
lived there - on a mote
of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.
For their part, and because they have «a
moral responsibility to all
children in the next generation,» including you, the letter explains they will give about 99 percent
of their Facebook shares, which currently means about $ 45 billion, during their
lives to advance their mission.
Self - important simpletons commonly hate anyone that isn't bound to the «
moral» standards
of verses such as Leviticus 20:13 which commands putting people to death that are not within the primitive social norms
of living in caves and sacrificing goats and
children and owning slaves.
Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their
moral laws on the fronts
of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from
living together, being intimate or raising
children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.
A God who could make good
children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one
of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter
life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his other
children to earn it; who gave his angels painless
lives, yet cursed his other
children with biting miseries and maladies
of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths
morals to other people, and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead
of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!
As an allegory about humanity's
moral freedom, the Tree
of Life would represent the instinctual innocence
of the animals and very young
children.
The same applies as
children get older, and their own
moral and spiritual
lives unfold, and the first stirrings
of vocation are perhaps sensed.
As long as our country allows the killing
of the unborn
child, we will continue to witness the collapse
of moral life, particularly among families.»
In the same book Pope John Paul wrote that «a determination on the part
of husband and wife to have as few
children as possible, to make their own
lives easy, is bound to inflict
moral damage both on their family and on society at large.»
We don't pass on
moral values directly, but we can open up the hearts
of our
children to encounter Christ, by our own example and by drawing them into this way
of life.
OR, might God choose to reveal truth through the experiences
of a people who tried to be true to him, certain
moral principles, failing again and trying again, people looking for universal truths and communicating them to their
children generation after generation, orally and through writing things down, organizing themselves into communities and societies, aiming for justice, teaching each other, defending their families,
lives, cities, and governments.
Jeremy thanks for your comments alot
of this i never really thought about before until you provoked me to seek the truth in the word it is what we all should be doing finding the truth for ourselves God wants to reveal mysterys if we are open to hear.If we have been christians awhile we just take the word
of whoevers preaching or whichever clip we see on god tube its knowledge but not revelation.Because the story sounds plausible we tag that on to our belief for example for many years i believed that the rich young rulers problem was money so the way to deal with that problem is to give it away and be a follower
of Jesus sounds plausible.Till you realise every believers situation is different so the message has to be universal.So the reason its not about money because it excludes those that do nt have it and does nt make room for those that do have it but do nt worship it.The rich young ruler was not a bad person he
lived by a good
moral code but he made money his idol he put that before God.The word says we shall not have any idols thats a sin and a wicked one.In fact there wasnt any room in his heart for Jesus that is a tragedy.So when we see the message is about Idolatry we all have areas that we chose not to submit to God thats universal everyone
of us whether we are rich or poor.I believe we are unaware that we have these idols what are some
of them that was revealed to me our partners our
children our work our church our family i can sense some
of you are getting fidgetty.
A feeling
of guilt so out
of proportion with what my
life was, is it inscribed in the nature
of every
child born into this world (the
moral law within us, according to Kant, attests the existence
of God), or is it a deformation occurring in infancy, imposed upon the Christians
of my kind, and which I have not known how to cure?
Everyone has personal favorites, and I would like to close with a few
of the books I have enjoyed with my
children: Noel Streatfield's books about families with dancing
children, including Ballet Shoes and Dancing Shoes; Cotton in My Sack and Indian Captive, books
of historical fiction by Lois Lenski; the hilarious picture book Seven Silly Eaters by Mary Ann Hoberman; the gentle
moral tale
of Rose, «who didn't work any harder than she had to»; Seven Loaves
of Bread, by Ferida Wolf; and the accurate depictions
of family
life in both Joanna Harrison's When Mom Turned into a Monster and Jean van Leeuwen's delightful Oliver and Amanda Pig stories.
Downing also calls attention to the images that had been incubating for years in Lewis's fertile imagination and that suddenly came to
life in the Narnia stories, and Jacobs suggests that we should hardly be surprised when a writer with a long record
of concern for
moral education turns to writing stories for
children.
To this may be added the odd fact that the same people who claim to be defenders
of freedom want to forbid Christians, for example, to send their
children to denominational schools or to
live according to their own
moral principles.
But on the side
of the goal
of «every unborn
child protected in law and welcomed in
life» is
moral truth, and what we must hope is the enduring, if sometimes inarticulate, decency
of most Americans.
This is not because I am unconcerned about the
moral state
of the parents but because I do not believe in depriving a
child of the grace
of God because
of the spiritual weaknesses
of its parents, or in using a
child in an attempt to persuade its parents to
live more virtuously.
Implicit belief in the power
of a good woman as a
moral influence in the
lives of children and men continues wherever Christian nurture in a good home is believed essential to the process
of becoming Christian.
It is not necessary for certain ideas to have evolved, as is evidenced by other cultures (not to say in any way that they are wrong, however, there are practices that oppose the
morals ingrained in us by the society we
live in) so could a parent raise perfectly good
children without the bible, in this day in age, probably yes, but you must recognize, that much
of what they will be teaching will come from their society, adn quite honestly I'm not sure honoring your parents, and not killing are such a bad thing.
the passionate devotion
of a mother — in herself, perhaps — to a sick or dying
child is perhaps the most simply beautiful
moral spectacle that human
life affords.
Toddlers need simple answers, preschoolers
live in a world
of fantasy and reality simultaneously, school - aged
children are more prone to desire facts, and adolescents are starting to form a
moral compass
of their own.
The
moral of that story is that nothing you do is going to cause a
life - long problem, but you could make your days a little easier by teaching your
child to take age - appropriate naps.
When your
child understands the underlying safety concerns, health hazards,
moral issues, or social reasons behind your rules, he'll develop a better understanding
of life.
Michigan: Custody is awarded based on the best interests
of the
child, based on the following factors:
moral character and prudence
of the parents; physical, emotional, mental, religious and social needs
of the
child; capability and desire
of each parent to meet the
child's emotional, educational, and other needs; preference
of the
child, if the
child is
of sufficient age and maturity; the love and affection and other emotional ties existing between the
child and each parent; the length
of time the
child has
lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability
of maintaining continuity; the desire and ability
of each parent to allow an open and loving frequent relationship between the
child and other parent; the
child's adjustment to his / her home, school, and community; the mental and physical health
of all parties; permanence
of the family unit
of the proposed custodial home; any evidence
of domestic violence; and other factors.
I am a spiritualist who believes women and
children are the ones who suffer most when the basic fundamental human rights are not adhered to in a country, and for the Rawlings family to have fought for the welfare
of women and
children all these years, Ghanaian women and the youth must learn from their
moral life and the kind
of unity in their marriage, and practice it,» Mama Destiny noted.
Hubert Humphry said, and I quote, «The
moral test
of government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn
of life, the
children; those who are in the twilight
of life, the elderly; and those who are in the shadows
of life, the sick, the needy and the disabled.»
Megamind hardly repents
of his sins, and we can not honestly say that he finds redemption, but the ability to turn one's
life around is a good
moral message for
children.
After losing his job, Vincent (Recoing) can't bring himself to tell his wife (Viard) and
children, so he wanders around France during the day, while they think he's at work, and finds himself on a
moral and ethical journey
of conscience that challenges the notions he's formed about
life.
The film contains the seemingly prerequisite chase and shootout sequences as Joe tracks his older self and Old Joe hunts the leader
of the syndicate that will betray him (at the time, still a
child, played by Pierce Gagnon, and
living with his mother, played by Emily Blunt, on a farm), but Johnson holds the disparate elements together with his insistence that we actively consider the film's
moral conundrums.
As Founder and President
of the international
children's charity Lumos, she told a London conference that all
children had a legal and
moral right to a family
life and that institutions, despite the best intentions, can not give the love and care they need to grow and reach their potential.
«Providing high - quality education for every
child is a
moral imperative if we truly want to
live up to the ideals
of a public education system and a democratic society,» she says
of her commitment to urban education.
This resource is inspired by the
morals from my book so can be incorporated into literacy / guided reading lesson, and aims to create class discussion through the introduction
of news words or reflecting on words already learned and how they can personally apply them to their own
life, which leads to
children creating positive self declarations which they can take home with them and keep safe.
The principal intellectual and
moral argument that advocates make — and for which I have considerable sympathy — is similar to that
of No
Child Left Behind (NCLB) backers: giving needy kids a boost up the ladder
of educational and later -
life success by narrowing the achievement gaps that now trap too many
of them on the lower rungs.
If you want to know why the NAACP has become irrelevant to the
lives of African - Americans, this typical display
of moral indifference to the plight
of minority
children is Exhibit A.
Other strategies include: (1) establishing and using a time - out or cooling - off place (even an informal time - out activity like having a
child take a message, book, or box
of chalk to another teacher could give the student the space and time he or she needs to maintain or regain composure); (2) applying role plays, simulations (for example, Barnga,
Living in a Global Age, Rafa - Rafa, and Broken Squares) and
moral dilemmas to teach students how to resolve conflicts, make collective decisions, appreciate different perspectives, weigh consequences, identify right from wrong, and check impulsive behavior; and (3) suggesting or assigning literature with characters who face similar challenges to that
of the disabled student.
Educators speak to the «
moral imperative,» the necessity
of «teaching to the whole
child,» the value
of «foundational skills for school, college, career, and
life,» and «the importance
of just being SEL.»
This holistic approach nurtures
children and develops students
of strong
moral character and instills Catholic values that guide them through
life's challenges.
But most
of these undertakings appear to have little or no impact on
children's
moral lives.
For the sake
of our
children, for whom a quality education is the key to a bright future; for the sake
of our parents, who want only the best for their
children; and for the sake
of our educators who dedicate their
lives to the noble task
of teaching, we must now take our energies and
moral high ground to demand that our leaders vote for a budget that serves the majority
of the American people, not the wealthy few.»
He said it was the
moral obligation
of the education reform movement to stand up to the status quo and save the
lives of these
children, many
of whom could be doomed to a
life of crime and poverty without a good education.
«The
Children's Hospital, a sprawling and impassioned morality tale in which a catastrophe
of biblical scale wipes out nearly all
life, human and otherwise, on Earth... despite its weaknesses, The
Children's Hospital establishes Chris Adrian as a remarkable American fabulist in the tradition
of Melvin Jules Bukiet and Tony Kushner, writers who define and confront the terrifying
moral choices
of a new century.»
To what extent do you view your investing
life as an extension
of your personal
life?By that I mean to what extent do the personal
morals and ethical values
of Tim the man govern the investing decisions
of Tim the dividend growth investor?If you ask your typical dividend growth investor if they would be willing to invest in a lucrative but immoral venture, say selling
child pornography or crack cocaine, the answer would probably be «absolutely not» regardless
of the yield, valuation or growth prospects
of the underlying venture.And yet, ask that same investor what their thoughts are about Phillip Morris and they would probably describe what a wonderful investment it is and go on about why you should own it.Do your personal
morals ever come into play when buying companies, or do you compartmentalize your conscience, wall it off from the part
of your brain that thinks about investments, and make your investing decisions based on the financial prospects
of the company?The reason why I'm asking is that I keep identifying stocks
of companies that I love from an investing perspective but despise on a human level.I can not in good conscience own any piece
of Phillip Morris knowing the impact that smoking related illness has on the families
of smokers.You might say that the smoker made his choice to smoke so you don't mind taking his money, but his
children never made that choice and they are the ones who will suffer when he dies 20 years too soon.
The aggregate
of all our joys and sufferings, thousands
of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer
of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful
child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher
of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history
of our species,
lived there on a mote
of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.
Given that premise, our job is to work out the details and they have hardly been all worked out, but when considering what premises are available upon which to base an «ethics» it seems one that starts with an axiom that an objective ethics is possible offers a helluva lot more potential for what we want, for what serves the
life of a rational, sentient being, than one that says it's a matter
of your bowels, or random electrical impulses in your brain or that your mind that tells you to murder my
children is the
moral equivalent
of my mind telling me to protect yours.
For example, a parent may be denied the right to overnight visitation in the presence
of one parent's paramour if the court is concerned that the
child's
moral development could be influenced by the parent's choice
of living arrangements.
GET OFF YOUR PHONE AND COMPUTER AND PARENT, ENJOY THEM, EDUCATE THEM, GUIDE THEM, KNOW YOUR
CHILD AND ITS NOT THAT HARD TO MAKE PARENTING THE GREATEST ACCOMPLISHMENT
OF YOUR
LIFE BY RAISING A GOOD,
MORAL, COMPASSIONATE, TOLERANT, KNOWLEDGE ABLE, ADULT TO LEAD THE SHEEPLES
OF the PROBLEM
CHILDREN who were ignored as kids.
Some parents indicated that they share the responsibility
of supporting
child physical activity, due to sharing an appreciation for the benefits
of physical activity or because they value physical activity and feel a
moral responsibility to fit activity in to the realities
of life.