I assure you I'm not joking and
a moral objector will do the exac same thing as a lazy person in that situation.
Lazy people, unlike
some moral objectors, will fire a gun if you put it in their hands inbattle.
Not exact matches
Our debates over pacifism often obscure the fact that both the supporter of war who kills and the conscientious
objector who risks allowing defenseless people to be killed both share the same fundamental
moral dilemma in spite of their different ways of solving it.
You can be a brilliant
moral philosopher with a prizewinning doctoral thesis expounding the evils of war, and still be given a hard time by a draft board evaluating your claim to be a conscientious
objector.
In the case of military conscription, someone who does not serve due to a
moral opposition to war in general (and not just a particular war) is called a conscientious
objector and in most countries, is usually allowed to perform alternative mandatory government service in lieu of military service if conscripted.
@NateEldredge: There is a «Conscientious
Objector» which allows those with religious or
moral reasons for objecting to fighting in a war.