This is an objective claim about the human mind, the dynamics of social relations, and
the moral order of our world.
Not exact matches
It can not be too strongly insisted that a
world which is to be a
moral order must be a physical
order characterized by law or regularity... The theist is only concerned to invoke the fact that the law - abidingness... is an essential condition
of the
world being a theatre
of moral life.
A
moral disposition toward one's
world, and a prior assent to certain
moral criteria, are the preconditions
of there being any psychological
order and consistency at all in a human personality.
As Christians with an international perspective, we will offer the blessings
of the Judeo - Christian
moral order and the Gospel
of Jesus Christ to women and men around the
world.
Thus the traditional conception
of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation
of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission with respect to evil done in the
world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack
of necessary relationship with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine
moral perfection, with the giving
of laws in accordance with which everything should be
ordered.
Taylor's analysis at times betrays a tendency to equate enchantment with the vertical, hierarchically -
ordered world of the Middle Ages and disenchantment with the horizontal
world of a modern
moral order.
To risk a generalization even more reckless than those I have already made: from the time
of the pre-Socratics, all the great speculative and
moral systems
of the pagan
world were, in varying degrees, confined to this totality, to either its innermost mechanisms or outermost boundaries; rarely did any
of them catch even a glimpse
of what might lie beyond such a
world; and none could conceive
of reality except as a kind
of strife between
order and disorder, within which a sacrificial economy held all forces in tension.
In both
of these strictures, the role
of theological ethics or
moral theology in practical theology was minimized, and the idea that practical theology dealt with the church's attempt to influence the
order of the public
world subsided.
Whether the phenomenon is called the death
of God, the modern disenchantment
of the
world, the loss
of a background
of value or the failure
of an ethical attitude toward nature, Western peoples» sense
of a
moral order to which they can, may or must conform has diminished.
If the church is to participate in the
moral renewal
of the
world order, then it must find its own theological renewal.
She outlines a structural semiology
of sexual
morals which connects «is» and «ought,» in
order to submit facts to a candid
world understood in the light
of a well understood grasp
of seemingly self evident
moral truths.
Alfred North Whitehead suggested that
moral progress in the
world consists in achieving patterns
of order which make it more possible for more people to live more nearly in accordance with Jesus» vision.
Human nature, in the sense
of man's basic physical, emotional, impulsive and intellectual constitution, somehow
moral at the core, seemed plainly more fundamental than any particular sort
of human behavior, even economic; and human nature itself emerges in a
world order far more ancient and more fundamental still.
The
world - rejecting elements in Christianity are adequately explained by Jewish apocalypticism, and this, despite its enmity toward the present
world, stopped short
of and opposed the dissolution
of moral order.
The Christian conception
of the
moral life as service in the
world of the
order of good which is never wholly realized in the
world opens the way to
moral integrity.
He says in Religion in the Making, «The metaphysical doctrine, here expounded, finds the foundations
of the
world in the aesthetic experience... All
order is therefore aesthetic
order, and the
moral order is merely certain aspects
of aesthetic
order.»
In spite
of the heroic renunciation
of the religious
orders they live in the
world, depend upon it, and become entangled with its economic and political injustices.13 What actually takes place in the Catholic attempt to meet the relativities
of moral choices is a continuous compromise with principles to fit situations.
He looked forward to the day when the crisis having passed «decentralization would be the
order of the day» and viewed the crisis as primarily a
moral one, warning
of the persistent temptation to greed and avarice
of the
world's most powerful nation.
The problem
of the compromise
of the Christian with the necessities
of secular life is solved in Catholicism by the establishment within the Church
of religious
orders in which, through renunciation
of «the
world,» the life
of love can be realized and the
moral merit thus achieved, shared with all the believers in the Church.
If we find atheists who believe the
world has a kind
of moral order, we do indeed have a great starting point for conversation with them.
Indeed, everybody holds certain principles
of «elemental faith»: for example, that the
world has some kind
of order to it, and that we have some kind
of moral responsibility Elemental faith and other forms
of secular faith provide «points
of contact» for Christians trying to explain saving faith.
But one thing is certain, and it appears to me that its recognition in theory, and acceptance in practice, must be the sine qua non
of any valid discussion and effective action affecting the political, economic and
moral ordering of the present
world: this is that nothing, absolutely nothing — we may as well make up our minds to it — can arrest the progress
of social Man towards ever greater interdependence and cohesion.
For them the
world at base is indeed really ideal, one body, as it were; evil is the superimposition by selfish desires
of feelings and actions that pervert the ideal harmony.15 The bulk
of the
moral program then is the elimination
of selfish desires so that the original clear character will shine through, or so that love
of the people will be fulfilled, with all that means for the
ordering of the family, economy, and state.
Even Jeremiah, while in contrast with his contemporaries he counseled submission to Babylon, could not draw the full inferences
of universal
moral obligation that were implicit in his idea
of God; and his contemporary, Habakkuk, could get no further than the assurance that the terrible power
of the conqueror was temporary and that his downfall would vindicate the
moral order of Yahweh's
world.
Considering them in reversed
order, it is plain that the great prophets and Jesus insistently drove back the
moral problem into the inner quality
of personal life The prophetic leaders
of Israel were as much interested as any members
of the nation in the success
of the social group; the beginning and end
of their thought was Israel redeemed, purified, and fulfilling her mission in the
world.
One
of the main functions
of religious models is the interpretation
of distinctive types
of experience: awe and reverence,
moral obligation, reorientation and reconciliation, interpersonal relationships, key historical events, and
order and creativity in the
world.
The aesthetic
order includes the
moral and conceptual and much more, because it is the
order of the total concrete fullness
of the
world.
So while we recognize a contradiction in Israel's thinking, here we can only trace the expression
of the concept
of a
moral order in the
world without trying to resolve the problem
of how completely it commanded the best Hebrew thought.
So huge are the
world's
moral horrors, Ivan argues, that they undermine any notion
of divine
order and purpose.
Instead
of being something arbitrary, which it was even in the thought
of Aquinas, it becomes central to the fulfilment
of the plan
of God in a sinful
world: this is not just a
moral redemption but «a work in the dynamic
order of being itself», a work in the ontological
order, by which He must restore and heal all the damage that has afflicted our being.
great root)
of existence, and
moral order is the universal law in the
world.
At the heart
of the story is the
moral quandary
of living in the real
world, rather than one in which
order and logic would suffice, and it is driven as much by philosophical considerations as by action.
Enlightenment thinkers like Diderot, Voltaire, and Rousseauwere promoting ideals
of moral goodness, rationalism, reason, and
order in the
world — ideals derived from the Greco - Romans — and artists began to reflect these values in their subject matter.
In
order to repower our economy, restore American economic and
moral leadership in the
world and regain control
of our destiny, we must take bold action now.
The statements
of the dissenting scientists have given both
moral support and intellectual ammunition to those who have opposed the climate - control crusade as a ply to increase the power
of government in developed countries and accelerate the trend toward one -
world government under a «new
world order.»