Is he considered a more
moral person by complying with the request, or by refusing it?
Jesus sometimes offended highly
moral people by befriending tax collectors.
Not exact matches
While you were probably right from a
moral perspective (judging
people by their appearance remains a crappy thing to do), apparently from a scientific one, you were pretty much dead wrong.
Not everyone agrees on what is noble, for example, and there have been atrocious acts of history committed
by people who sincerely believed they were acting on a
moral ideal.
«Those aged over 70 are viewed
by people as more friendly, more competent and as having higher
moral standards than those in their 20s,» the researchers noted.
At a moment when the Republicans are talking about entitlement reform, and Ben Carson, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, is proposing to triple the rents of some of the poorest
people in the country, the sight of big banks reporting surges in profits that were fuelled
by tax cuts raises alarming
moral questions.
«He's an egomaniac devoid of all
moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all,
by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little
people ---- said all the little
people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»
That's the real truth, and that's why
people are fascinated
by other ways which have remained less disturbed
by the Gospel that really grips this society, which is that there should be no constraint on individual consumer choice in goods or
morals.
In short, I consider this «reality» show as must see TV which attempts to convince non-Muslim viewers of Muslim self - importance,
moral superiority, and feigned persecution with every condescending word uttered
by these hypocritical, duplicitous
people.
The stories of players in these accounts challenge our
moral imagination
by forcing us to recognize that the uniformed men on the field are not just Football Players, but
Persons - brothers, fathers, husbands, and sons like me.
If you want to keep
people focused on your religion as a unifying set of
moral and practical codes to live
by, make attendence to religious services and taking the day off work to attend mandatory or else it is a sin punishable
by death.
Academic
moral theory, like preaching, «stiffens the backbone» of one's coreligionists (or co «ideologues)
by «convincing
people who think like you that they are not alone in their beliefs [and] have the backing of someone who is confident, competent, articulate, and thoughtful.»
«Not many
people,» Elliott notes, «feel a
moral duty to take part in these studies»» though, of course, we are more than happy to reap the benefits brought
by new drugs.
John Beyond the Golden Rule, which is something that was already pretty universal and predates the Bible
by hundreds of years, what
moral advice the Bible gives is hopelessly outdated, and it's message of a preferred
people, be they Jew or Christian, is really rather elitist.
There are many songs written and played
by people against whom I have the most fundamental and passionate disagreements in the
moral and intellectual realms (which are the most important ones), yet hearing their songs can evoke ecstatic feelings that are very much like feelings of worship and longing for God.
God makes good stuff... Even good
moral people who don't know he was made
by him.
He refused to believe that the false ideas of the human
person and human history embodied in communism could divide Europe indefinitely; and
by igniting a revolution of conscience behind the iron curtain, the man the last president of the Soviet Union called «the world's greatest
moral authority» became an agent of liberation for his Slavic brethren and the precursor of new possibilities in international affairs.
History provides the
moral judgment, and we do not have to be theologians engaged in scriptural debates to point
people to the judgment rendered
by history... Elaine
These
people can have their
morals but in Actual Truth, nobody is being harmed
by viewing p0rn.
Trying to be someone else and trying to live up to expectations put on you
by a Pastor or church
moral police is what leads
people to sneak to do things and feel guilty about doing the things that make them happy.
I'm a Christian and I KNOW Christ exists, but not in this man - conttived and contorted punishing unforgiving version conceived and dictated
by those with
morals much more questionable than the average decent
person on the street or even myself.
By «classical spirituality,» Wells is referring to the devotional habits and moral demeanor of the Protestant Reformers which had been «passed on in deepened pastoral form by the Puritans» and now have extended «down through history and into the present through people like Martyn Lloyd - Jones, J. I. Packer, John Stott, Francis Schaeffer, and Carl Henry.&raqu
By «classical spirituality,» Wells is referring to the devotional habits and
moral demeanor of the Protestant Reformers which had been «passed on in deepened pastoral form
by the Puritans» and now have extended «down through history and into the present through people like Martyn Lloyd - Jones, J. I. Packer, John Stott, Francis Schaeffer, and Carl Henry.&raqu
by the Puritans» and now have extended «down through history and into the present through
people like Martyn Lloyd - Jones, J. I. Packer, John Stott, Francis Schaeffer, and Carl Henry.»
She is surrounded daily with supporters who bolster her views,
people who understand themselves as
moral crusaders, pursuing their aims with all the zeal inspired
by political ideology or — perhaps more aptly — ersatz religion.
That biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American idea: that government stood under the judgment of divine and natural law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness was measured
by fidelity to the
moral truths taught
by revelation and inscribed in the world
by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous
people could be truly free.
But, as John Paul, Havel, and others said at the beginning of the revolution and say now, it was above all a matter of
people discerning the possibility and
moral imperative of «living in truth» and «calling good and evil
by name.»
It is not clear to me how much of Jody Bottum's
moral analysis in» Blood for Blood» and» They Did It» is meant to apply only to sad case of the
person just executed and how much is meant to apply to all uses of the death penalty
by modern states.
A God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his other children to earn it; who gave his angels painless lives, yet cursed his other children with biting miseries and maladies of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied
by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths
morals to other
people, and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!
An isolated tribe in the Amazon jungle has just been contacted
by the outside world for the first time, do you believe as tf does that his god has written his
morals on the hearts of these
people?
Penn Jillette makes this observation about god, claiming to be
moral, doing things that would be considered highly immoral if done
by people.
There are only
people raised
by a different but equal
moral code.
My racist relatives in Mississippi used to talk about the
moral decay brought
by integrating black
people into white society... of cours, e they didn't complain about the cross burnings or lynchings being
moral decay..
A politics of reason gave way to a politics of emotion and flirted with the politics of irrationality; the claims of
moral reason were displaced
by moralism; the notion that all men and women were called to live lives of responsibility was displaced
by the notion that some
people were,
by reason of birth, victims; patriotism became suspect, to be replaced
by a vague internationalism; democratic persuasion was displaced
by judicial activism.
Yes, those who like to say that there are
moral absolutes inherent in
people, places, or things are clearly shown to be wrong
by the simple existence of an unstable and diverse and contradictory bunch of «holy books».
My own father, a
person of the highest
moral character and integrity was accused of being shady
by my abuser because he tried to find us alternative housing when my abuser (although court ordered to pay the mortgage) willfully and vindictively drove it into foreclosure and the kids and I homeless, while he went off and bought he and his spiritual wife a new home.
Unexpectedly and uncomfortably accepting outcasts
by breaking social mores, he created a sense of belonging for them, which frequently conflicted with the
moral sensibilities of religious
people of his day, angering them.
This
moral discipline informs Fredriksen's effort to present her subjects as
persons who loved, aspired, and suffered, rather than as mere ciphers moved
by abstract historical or cultural forces.
A
person may prolong his life
by eating right, good exercise, good habits,
moral attributes that strengthen the mind, abstaining from harmful habits, resisting desires to go to clubs, parties, socials, etc, that includes mischief making mankind, etal.
It is against this background of public
moral struggle that the
people of Israel prepare to vote on July 23 for their next government, in an election that pits the conservative Likud Party of Menachem Begin and current Prime Minister Yitzak Shamir against the Labor Party headed
by two - time loser Shimon Peres.
@Dunk... yeah right I'll get it out, when my money doesn't get used
by people like you... You are pretty lame to think that you would have no
morals if you didn't read what you should do.
Roger Harding, head of public attitudes at the National Centre for Social Research who produced a report into the findings, was quoted
by The Times as saying: «It suggests
people are taking their
moral views from elsewhere.»
Prominent academics and civil liberties organizations have raised the prospect of stripping churches of their tax exemptions and pursuing litigation to require private companies and civic groups to be led and staffed
by people who pledge allegiance to the
moral creed of the left.
If the church focused on teaching
people to be
moral by upholding bible principles instead of their own traditions, they wouldn't have to be concerned.
If a
person wishes to pursue a dubious
moral course, the easy way is to disguise his conduct as the action of a free man, uninhibited
by old rules, breaking loose and acting on his own.
It may not seek to compel
people to live
by its
moral vision, but it does seek to persuade them to do so.
In today's divided
moral landscape, with thoughtful, well - meaning
people on both sides of every issue, there's no better way to show that you're a serious thinker than
by acknowledging that every controversial issue is «complex.»
I think a big thing about being spiritual is believing in something higher than yourself without being tied to some arbitrarily specific
moral code created
by people (not God (s)-RRB- in the context of their times that often has horrifyingly backwards and incredibly immoral rules.
It is important as far as possible to remove temptation
by changes in the situation that surrounds us, to develop strength of will and clearness of
moral judgment through any help other
people can give us, to utilize whatever inner resources we have for doing right.
When a patient's problems are related to religious or
moral conflict, the staff clergyman would be the most likely
person for the patient to see because of his authority in this area and because he may be perceived
by the patient to be the most appropriate
person to deal with these problems.
Cynicism and
moral anarchism, whether expressed in crimes against
persons and property
by the dispossessed or in self - interested manipulation
by the better - off, are, if I read modern history right, more likely a prelude to authoritarianism if not fascism.
What's more,
by writing persuasive articles about
people's
moral obligation to give away money, Singer has caused tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of dollars to be donated to famine relief organizations.