This conference will bring together many of his friends, colleagues, and other leading living
moral philosophers in order to honor his memory and make progress on those questions he believed matter most.
Derek Parfit was «thought by many to be the most original
moral philosopher in the English - speaking world» (The New Yorker).
Not exact matches
On the other hand, the world
in which these
moral philosophers flourish is a world that has lost its
moral bearings
in an unprecedented way.
This «
moral reading» of the Constitution calls on judges to act as
moral philosophers: «equal protection of the laws» should mean what best promotes «equal concern and respect» for all humans; «liberty»
in the «due process» clause should mean autonomy
in matters important to personal development, and so forth.
Like most modern thinkers, Rousseau has an enormous amount of confidence
in the ability of the «
moral law within» (to quote another Rousseauian
philosopher) to point each of us
in the right direction.
He draws heavily upon the
philosopher Hans Jonas, who
in turn shows the importance of a religiously grounded
moral vision.
The «realists» spawned ethicists who became
moral philosophers, clarifying
moral questions
in medicine and business and,
in their spare time, keeping alive the «God question.»
The nineteenth century
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche shrewdly observed that
in his day the bourgeois elites of Europe wanted the fruit of Christianity (i.e.,
moral culture) without the tree itself (i.e., the actual doctrine and practice).
A temporary condition of this sort, connected with the religious evolution of a singularly lofty character, both intellectual and
moral, is well described by the Catholic
philosopher, Father Gratry,
in his autobiographical recollections.
One of the searching interpretations of atonement
in the twentieth century was given by the
philosopher Josiah Royce
in The Problem of Christianity.8 Royce's philosophic idealism was built upon the tragic aspect of life and what he called the «
moral burden of the individual».
Though our
moral philosophers have differed
in many details, especially
in regard to the sources of
moral judgment, they have agreed amazingly
in regard to what men ought to do.
There is
in most of us a spark of reason, and much was achieved for universal human
moral standing by the great Stoic
philosophers who emphasized this logos
in us all.
In Living Faithfully in a Fragmented World: Lessons for the Church from MacIntyre's «After Virtue» (1998), Wilson responds to moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, who concludes his celebrated 1991 critique of modernity by calling for «the construction of local forms of community within which civility and the intellectual and moral life can be sustained through the new dark ages which are already upon us..
In Living Faithfully
in a Fragmented World: Lessons for the Church from MacIntyre's «After Virtue» (1998), Wilson responds to moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, who concludes his celebrated 1991 critique of modernity by calling for «the construction of local forms of community within which civility and the intellectual and moral life can be sustained through the new dark ages which are already upon us..
in a Fragmented World: Lessons for the Church from MacIntyre's «After Virtue» (1998), Wilson responds to
moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, who concludes his celebrated 1991 critique of modernity by calling for «the construction of local forms of community within which civility and the intellectual and
moral life can be sustained through the new dark ages which are already upon us....
That's one of the most fundamental differences, I think, between a deeply conservative position and a strictly libertarian one: conservatives think that for all its merits, the right we have to choose
in the marketplace needs to be shaped by virtue and ordered by a
moral order (I never tire of pointing out that Adam Smith thought himself a
moral philosopher).
It's just that every
moral philosopher that I've read has been a believer
in God / s.
These
philosophers also believed that people were basically virtuous; they supposed that improved standards of living, and habits rationally modified by knowledge, would lead to gradually rising
moral standards
in society.
The Catholic
philosopher Alice von Hildebrand suggests that «when piety dies out
in women, society is threatened
in its very fabric; for a woman's relationship to the sacred keeps the Church and society on an even keel, and when this link is severed, both are threatened by total
moral chaos.»
Why, we would not be at all surprised if even some of those «serious
moral philosophers» think
in ways shaped by considerations that TNR might deem «religious.»
Although the complex
moral ability called courage, highly honored by the ancients and ignored by most non-existentialist modern
philosophers, is not directly named by Whitehead, it is directly implicated throughout his works
in discussions of tragedy and heroism.
Carol Tauer, a
philosopher at Minnesota's St. Catherine's College, has recently challenged the
moral logic of this declaration, as well as of the current pastoral teachings on abortion,
in an incisive and thorough analysis of the tradition of probabilism — a theory of practical decision - making that is accepted
in Catholic
moral teaching.
Since one of the most famous exponents of process thought has called the western notion of substance a chief cause of
moral evil and selfishness
in the western world (WVR 6), it is astonishing that another famous process
philosopher should have tried a reconciliation between process thought, with its emphasis on relations and actions, and Aristotelian substantialism, with its emphasis on things and states of being.3
Together these
philosophers have supplied a new interpretation of Aristotle's ethics and the Thomist natural law tradition which has allowed Robert P. George and like - minded writers to make a fruitful (
in some aspects) and definitely noticeable
moral critique of American politics and culture.
In 2011, the
moral theologian Janet E. Smith wrote that «scholars and
philosophers owe it to our fellow men and women to get this straight.»
Specifically referred to by the Court was evidence given by BHA Vice President and
moral philosopher Simon Blackburn, who had said, «True respect for life means respect for the persons whose lives are
in question - refusing assistance, when their plea is settled and uncoerced discounts and demeans their personhood.
An occupational therapist turned political
philosopher, he holds degrees
in occupational therapy and
moral sciences, and is currently completing a PhD at the University of Tampere (Finland) on the politics of basic income.
Although the terms political philosophy and political theory are used rather indiscriminately, those who think of themselves as political
philosophers tend to link what they do closely to philosophical and
moral principles; while those who call themselves political theorists tend to appeal to facts about the world and to the way
in which the structures and processes of social and political life limit the possibilities for the realisation of those principles by political agency.
Through helping students develop as
moral philosophers, critical consumers of information and civic agents, we hope to change the way they see themselves as individuals
in a larger society.
Wesley believed that Christianity was essentially a social religion, and Methodist preachers engaged
in a variety of humanitarian endeavors that were practical expressions of the ideas of the
moral philosophers.
However, the difference is that whereas Mma Ramotswe is an African Miss Marple - who has an instinctive understanding of people based on her close observations of life
in her own small community, the star of this new series is an extremely well read
moral philosopher named Isabel Dalhousie which gives McCall Smith a wider and more sophisticated canvas on which to work.
In the 18th century, philosopher Jeremy Betham framed the issue about animals and law in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislatio
In the 18th century,
philosopher Jeremy Betham framed the issue about animals and law
in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislatio
in An Introduction to the Principles of
Morals and Legislation.
I would be energetically seeking out opinion pieces, articles, and letters from leaders
in the various fields, i.e., relevant scientists, relevant
moral philosophers, relevant economists, relevant psychologists, and so forth.
Recall that the environmentalist
moral philosopher holds the public
in low esteem.
This is one of the best pieces I have read
in a long time, combining the insights of one of the best climate scientists (Pierrehumbert) with those of our most challenging
moral philosopher, Peter Singer.
On no more than the basis that «climate change is occurring»,
moral philosophers tell us what is right, social historians invent lessons from history to make climate criminals
in the present, science historians invent conspiracy theorists, and psychologists tell us how to apply distress to change public opinion, and why debate is just too risky to trust to the public.
In other words, of all folks, really, responsible ethicists and (practical)
moral philosophers should be doing whatever it takes, at this point, to bring about ethically sound ACTION.
People (the public, the media, and so forth) naturally wonder, if only 1 percent of all ethicists, spiritual leaders,
moral philosophers, other
philosophers, «wise women and men», and so forth are speaking out
in ethical /
moral terms, then those ethical /
moral arguments must truly be «not all that important», or «highly controversial and not broadly accepted», or «only held by theoretical folks», or whatever.
Philosopher Stephen Gardiner of the University of Washington
in Seattle says it is a «perfect
moral storm».
Many
philosophers who study ethics agree that it is important to consider the consequences of one's actions
in a
moral dilemma to come to an acceptable judgment.