You can be a person who does not believe in God and still behave according to major ethical and
moral values of the society you live in, but to follow a faith requires a belief in God.
Not exact matches
Should our
society's dialogue about
values proceed in the context
of the Constitution, and more particularly, in the arena
of constitutional litigation with primacy given to the courts as
moral tutors?
«It is through the humanities principally,» says Coughlin, president
of Gonzaga University from 1974 to 1996, «that the culture,
values, and
moral principles
of the Judeo - Christian tradition are kept alive in Western
society.
In worship, art, architecture, literature, communal life, language, beliefs,
moral values, models
of a virtuous life, views
of the past, the persistence
of an aristocratic culture» in all
of these aspects
of life, a profound and far - reaching transformation
of the
society was underway, and the book would have benefited from greater attention to at least some
of them.
All
of them use the current
values of secular
society as the point
of reference against which to present the
moral teachings
of the Catholic faith.
This, however, is to impoverish attempts to bring spiritual and
moral values to bear on both national and world
society, because practical action needs to flow from the life
of the spirit.
And a
society that believes this must, at least implicitly, embrace and subtly advocate a very particular
moral metaphysics: the unreality
of any «
value» higher than choice, or
of any transcendent Good ordering desire towards a higher end.
We have lost the feeling
of security that our forebears experienced when their
society was still permeated by the social and
moral values provided by the religious tradition concerned.
Personally I see more
value in appealing to human decency and modern culture than to attempting to make the
moral views
of iron age civilizations entrenched in sexism, racial bigotry, and a host
of other very morally questionable beliefs somehow fit our modern
society.
When those fundamental
values are translated into concrete
moral choice, the resulting norm may in fact differ from one historical situation to another — from the premonarchic agricultural setting in Israel to the affluence
of the eighth century to the period
of Hellenistic or Roman domination to today's secularized
society.
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind
of religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing
of «conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the result
of widespread reaction against «secular humanist»
values and against those who hold such
values; (4) that our
society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in
moral consensus, a loss
of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all
of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind
of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
Some how it's felt that
values,
morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws
of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful
societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations
of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code
of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not
of words
of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions
of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs
of the nation or nations under one country flag...!
This challenge presents itself in the form
of three dangers: (1) the danger
of a growing disparity between economic classes; (2) the danger
of materialism,
of the rewards
of the economic system becoming the goals and
values of society; and (3) the danger
of a selfish pseudo-individualism that evades individual
moral responsibility.
It is they, perhaps more than schoolteachers and parents, who set the intellectual and
moral tone
of the
society and suggest the
values that shall govern the conduct
of life.
Also along with this comes the lack
of moral values that have been lost due to today's work crazy
society, extreme interest on financial well being and the lack
of moral and religious principles.
A new U.S. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention
of Violence, headed by Milton S. Eisenhower, stated: «Violence on television encourages violent forms
of behavior, and fosters
moral and social
values about violence in daily life which are unacceptable in a civilized
society.»
Doesn't the Chinese government advocate a return to Confucianism and traditional Chinese
values to deal with the
moral crisis
of Chinese
society?
In this sense, religion and religious
values act as social glue: informing
society's understanding
of the public good, providing the vocabulary
of common
moral discourse, and, consequently, restraining and bonding the centrifugal forces
of national life.
This renewal requires a commitment to fundamental
values within a framework
of belief - in this case Christian faith - that is in dialogue with other frameworks.49 From a similar perspective, Robin Gill sees the primary function
of the church in
society as that
of generating «key
values which alter the fundamental
moral, social, and political vision.»
In the encyclical Evangelium Vitae, the Pope expressed this relationship within the framework
of the common good: «It is urgently necessary, for the future
of society and the development
of a sound democracy, to rediscover those essential and innate human and
moral values which flow from the very truth
of the human being and express and safeguard the dignity
of the person:
values which no individual, no majority, and no State can ever create, modify, or destroy, but must only acknowledge, respect, and promote.»
When policies do not presume or promote objective
values, the resulting
moral relativism, instead
of leading to a
society that is free, fair, just and compassionate, tends instead to produce frustration, despair, selfishness and a disregard for the life and liberty
of others.
My own hope is that the religions
of the world will come together to affirm the spiritual and
moral values on which a new world
society needs to be based.
Heightened awareness
of the link between cultural problems and
moral irresponsibility has spawned a nearly universal condemnation
of the «war on
values» being waged in American
society.
There would be no external standards
of what is right and wrong, just and unjust,
moral and immoral, by which its results could be judged; there would be no guarantee that, even in the absence
of outside intervention, globalization would be a benign process; and there would be no assurance that in a free
society, left to itself, we could count on an evolution
of moral beliefs to generate
values which would continue to underpin the market order.19
Secondly, Christians and Muslims need, together with members
of other faiths, to reflect on the
values that they share and on the
moral basis
of a healthy
society and a just and peaceful international order.
William Glasser captured the sum and substance
of the quest for our own day as early as 1969 when he stated that «certain
moral values can be taught in school if the teaching is restricted to principles about which there is essentially no disagreement in our
society» (emphasis added).
That is why atheists who call themselves «good» are, in truth, merely cherry - picking their
values /
morals from the
values /
morals considered by the vast, religious majority
of society to be «good».
With such a
moral heritage, combining both high
value and narrow limitation, the tribes
of Israel entered Palestine and, after a long conflict with the previous inhabitants, settled down to adjust and synthesize their cultural traditions in the midst
of the much more complicated agricultural and urban
society which they had conquered.
Advocating censorship as a solution ignores the complexity
of associated issues
of freedom
of speech and questions
of imposition
of one particular set
of moral values in a socially and morally pluralistic
society.
Beneath this is the question
of whether a
society needs some shared
moral values.
As Americans in a pluralistic
society, however, we must create a milieu for
moral decision - making that is somewhere between
value conferred by intention or relation alone, and the abstract mystical fetishism that deifies the substance
of human life in and
of itself.
«A
society which limits itself - and its education - to a positivistic understanding
of reason [limited to what can be positively seen] will find itself unable to determine shared
moral principles and
values.
In its summary, the Commission stated: «Violence on television encourages violent forms
of behavior, and fosters
moral and social
values about violence in daily life which are unacceptable in a civilized
society.»
Society is built on abstract ideas, science, and technology, not a
moral code
of values and ethics.
A
moral panic is a widespread fear, most often an irrational one, that someone or something is a threat to the
values, safety, and interests
of a community or
society at large.
She charged the students on the need to imbibe the spirit
of moral values, describing them as the agent
of positive change in the
society.
The British Humanist Association has condemned remarks made by Prime Minister David Cameron, in which he stated that Britain was a Christian country, that it was only as a Christian country that Britain could be welcoming
of those
of other religions, and that Christian
values could reverse British
society's «
moral collapse».
Buratai, in a remark at a security stakeholders's meeting on Thursday in Wukari, Taraba State, said that restoring
moral values to youths was crucial to addressing crime and increasing rate
of insecurity in the
society.
Often ethics in science teaching is primarily connected to internal scientific
values as opposed to
moral values in relation to science and the rest
of society.
Being in a perpetual state
of war is damaging to the intangible elements
of society, such as ethics,
values, norms and
morals.
The standard
of political and
moral performance required to consider should be the following: 1) increase
of solidarity among the inhabitants
of the country; 2) increase in the practice
of social justice by organs
of government and civil
society; 3) increase in the distribution
of income and wealth among the population; 4) increase
of measures to preserve and care for nature; 5) increase in policies for integral development
of education in accordance with the highest human
values; 6) advances in the realization
of the collective will
of the citizens; 7) improvement
of political institutions; 8) success in combating corruption measured by its reduction; 9) increase in the exercise
of citizenship with the effective participation
of citizens in government decisions and fight for expansion
of their rights; and 10) increase
of contribution
of public and private organizations to the political, economic, social and environmental development
of the country.
Joel Spring observes, «The combination
of moral and political instruction meant that the student leaving the common school would share with fellow students a set
of moral and political beliefs; the result would be the creation
of a
society with a consensus
of political and
moral values.»
Since around the middle
of the twentieth century,
society has witnessed a marked decline in spiritual and
moral values throughout the Western World, including a distinct weakening
of traditional sexual mores.
The Tri County Humane
Society for the prevention
of cruelty to animals believes animals, as living creatures, have
value beyond economic measure and are entitled to legal,
moral, ethical consideration, and protection.
Ferguson added: «This research may help
society focus on issues that really matter and avoid devoting unnecessary resources to the pursuit
of moral agendas with little practical
value.»
My sense from reading some
of the criticism directed at the Law
Society is that the critics are uncomfortable with the Law
Society imposing
moral values on its licensees: because the
value and parameters
of inclusion, equality and diversity are contested and unclear, the Law
Society ought not to require its members to acknowledge a duty to promote them.
So - called «general» or «non-economic» damages in civil claims where someone is killed are awarded based upon California Civil Jury Instruction 3921, which states that a jury must come up with a dollar figure
value for the loss
of, «love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection,
society,
moral support.»
An understanding
of, and commitment to, these
values and the development
of the skills to uphold and promote them throughout
society provides an opportunity for students in Australia to be active and informed citizens who act with
moral and ethical integrity.