Sentences with phrase «morals on atheists»

The Conservative Christian does seek to legally impose his / her morals on Atheists.

Not exact matches

Typical atheist response... it's funny how atheist blame the world's problems on religion, when it's hate - filled comments like these, that show how the atheist are leading the moral decline of the world.

How do atheists explain the obvious benefit, both economically, educationally, socially, and spiritually, that America receives when its people are walking with God, ministering through church and missions, and creating and basing laws and moral conduct on Biblical teachings?

Mearly that the specific moral code that atheists in the West espouse is based on 2,000 years of Christian teaching in Europe.

Atheists can be exceptionally moral people and religious fanatics can be some the the most self - serving amoral people on earth.

On stupidity, claiming that there are no morals for atheists is like saying that Fred Phelps represents all Christians.

Atheist morality is without any objective basis and, if followed with integrity, doesn't allow them to act against others who act contrary to their moral system (as they insist that each subjective moral judgment is equal in value, all being based purely on individual feelings).

As an aside, the irony might be lost on you that, despite the fact that so many atheists here are so quick to note that believers do not have a monopoly on morals, you are essentially proving the point of believers that, from a historical perspective, atheists far more than believers have lacked morals vis - a-vis war and death.

You get on here and scream about «typical atheists» having «no morals» and «no brains» when you are unable to spell the words you use or provide anything resembling facts while pretending they exist.

Atheists can be moral, happy, financially successful, kind, have good families, be charitable, and so on, all without having to profess faith in god no one can show exists.

Atheists can't explain why in a situation with two people who disagree on morals, one person can be wrong, and one person can be right.

I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).

Who the hell said atheists have no morals on what's right and wrong?

What a bunch of bull... Only atheists can hold true moral values, as they are not based on the fear of punishment from gods.

At least Christians have moral teachings to try to counterbalance and tame disputes, unlike atheists who have absolutely no cohesive views on morality.

On the other hand, being an atheist, she naturally espouses amoral behavior; a lack of moral principles — only those that are self - imposed and self - executed, and which are subject to change at a whim.

Later I did stop going to Church but also never joined a gang — moved on from that neighborhood FYI — If this all puzles u, even as an Atheist my morals are as strong and probably stronger than those of most religious people.

@babbo natale, I challenge you to find 1 atheists that bases their intelligence level on a concept such as rejecting morals.

Obviously it's ridiculous — atheists have very good morals because of an emphasis on empathy, and a lot of our philosophy is based on the knowledge that this is our one and only life so you'd better live it right, but I can understand why it's incredibly disturbing to someone who literally can not imagine life without religious belief.

Why do you insist on defending atheists as being more moral than everyone else?

Given that morality is an innate human quality and NOT taught explicitly by religion, atheists must make their own moral path based on what they think is right.

Even the morality expressed by so called atheists is a moral compass that is a legacy ingrained into our culture, passed on as an inheritance, from our Judeo - Christian heritage.

But although atheists might argue that a «disbelief in the immateriality or immortality of the soul» would not «make a person less caring, less moral, less committed to the well - being of everybody on Earth,» A. F. Christian is quick to point out the evidence to the contrary.

According to a Patheos post she wrote on Monday, entitled «This is my last post for the Patheos Atheist Portal,» she began to see parts of Christianity and Catholicism that fit her moral system.

Any atheist who feels the need for an external «moral compass» is certainly not atheistic as a result of a well - thought out and educated take on the matter.

Maybe atheists» principles involve not imposing their moral beliefs on others...