We know that
more Labour Party members supported David Miliband for the leadership rather than Ed.
Not exact matches
To add to the uncertainty, Prime Minister Theresa May's handling of the negotiations could cost her her job — she could be replaced by a
more «hardline» Tory leader or the
Labour Party's leader, Jeremy Corbyn.
Britain's shocking decision to remove itself from the European Union brought
more political turmoil Sunday as Scotland's leader threatened to block the move and the opposition
Labour Party's leader faced a coup attempt from his own legislators.
Using third
party companies, such as Foxconn in China, can provide access to
labour that is cheaper and
more efficient.
Christian political activist charity CARE has rebuked the
Labour party for intervening in Northern Ireland's...
More
The leaders of the Conservative,
Labour and Liberal Democrat
parties have written articles in the Church...
More
A Christian
Labour MP has received support from
more than 100 MPs from across the political parties backing...
more than 100 MPs from across the political
parties backing...
MoreMore
A Christian
Labour MP tells Premier the
party is enthusiastic about winning the election in June - even...
More
Christians on the Left is urging the
Labour Party to support its call for Syrian and Iraqi refugees to...
More
The manifesto of the
Labour Party has football
more front and centre; while neither English football nor
Labour are as uncomplicatedly working class as they once were, you're still far
more likely to find a football fan on the red side of the argument.
Former British
Labour Party MP Kevin McNamara, who has died aged 82, probably did
more during his long political career than any other British politici -LRB-...)
If it isn't the Blue
Labour position on migration, it is certainly a coherent position on migration -
more than our
party's current confused stance.
The phrase «the working class» appears
more often than it would in the memoirs of a true Blairite (as in the other Blair), always as the description of a group in modern Britain who are downtrodden and defended by the
Labour Party.
Perhaps
more important was that the conference marked out the ground on which the
parties are likely to try and fight the next election — the Conservatives will ask for time to finish the job of fixing the economy,
Labour will focus on trying to reduce people's cost of living.
, built as it was from the emerging
Labour movement, any
more than
Labour could «strangle» the environmental movement and Green
Party or the Liberal Democrats (despite your best efforts: little sign of success post-1974); or any
more than the LibDems could conceivably «destroy and replace» the
Labour Party in the next decade or two.
So, I think, if anything,
Labour will be pleased to hear that Cameron believes that the answer to the
party's poll woes is to go still
more relentlessly negative.
Rarely in the annals of
Labour Party history has there been a
more insignificant and futile event.
12:25 - Andy Sawford gets a lot of cheers for raising
party funding, but Cameron is cheered even
more for attacking
Labour's union funding.
Turning to
more serious matters, Mr Reid said he joined the
Labour party, like most others, to see a «
more equal and just society» - not to «fight a war against terrorists».
The Conservatives have received well over half of all
party donations this year and far
more than
Labour and the Liberal Democrats combined.
The welfare uprating bill will try to force
Labour on the «wrong» side of public opinion, while encouraging
party populists like Liam Byrne to get into a firefight with the
more left - wing elements.
It seems rather
more plausible to me to say that where the Liberal
Party failed to recognise its own enlightened self - interest was in failing to do
more to hug close the
labour movement and perhaps Labour Party itself: had they been more able to select working - class candidates themselves, and / or been able to more forcefully develop the New Liberalism against some Gladstonian instincts, (or indeed kept the Fabian intellectuals interested: they broke with permeation only after the Liberal rejection of the 1909 Minority Report on the Poor Law, even having helped form the Labour Party from 1900 - 06) then it may have been possible that Labour would have remained primarily a trade union pressure group within a broader progressive all
labour movement and perhaps
Labour Party itself: had they been more able to select working - class candidates themselves, and / or been able to more forcefully develop the New Liberalism against some Gladstonian instincts, (or indeed kept the Fabian intellectuals interested: they broke with permeation only after the Liberal rejection of the 1909 Minority Report on the Poor Law, even having helped form the Labour Party from 1900 - 06) then it may have been possible that Labour would have remained primarily a trade union pressure group within a broader progressive all
Labour Party itself: had they been
more able to select working - class candidates themselves, and / or been able to
more forcefully develop the New Liberalism against some Gladstonian instincts, (or indeed kept the Fabian intellectuals interested: they broke with permeation only after the Liberal rejection of the 1909 Minority Report on the Poor Law, even having helped form the
Labour Party from 1900 - 06) then it may have been possible that Labour would have remained primarily a trade union pressure group within a broader progressive all
Labour Party from 1900 - 06) then it may have been possible that
Labour would have remained primarily a trade union pressure group within a broader progressive all
Labour would have remained primarily a trade union pressure group within a broader progressive alliance.
Ten per cent of respondents said
Labour's tougher line on cuts would make them
more likely to vote for the
party but 13 % said it would make them less likely.
«For me, if the secular left suggests is allergic to any public role for faith, it seems to me to risk misunderstanding its own history - given that the foundation of the
Labour Party did owe
more to Methodism than Marxism - and to turn down the opportunity to build new alliances for social justice today.»
Regarding the UK, the issue seems to have become
more relevant since Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader of the
Labour Party.
More generally, the
Labour Party has has always been a coalition of different ideologies and interests, and has never been a wholly liberal party, but it has often been an important advocate and vehicle of social libera
Party has has always been a coalition of different ideologies and interests, and has never been a wholly liberal
party, but it has often been an important advocate and vehicle of social libera
party, but it has often been an important advocate and vehicle of social liberalism.
«Liberal» then started to mean what it means now in the United States, meaning a preference for governmental involvement in things, et cetera (
more like the
Labour Party in the United Kingdom).
From the 1970s, Harriet campaigned for increased women's representation in the
Labour Party -
more women
Labour councillors,
more women
Labour MPs and for a
Labour leadership team of three of which at least one should be a woman.
The reason for this is that there are many
more liberal
parties in the UK Parliament than Conservative, and chances are that during motions that have to carry in parliament that need a majority conservatives will have a hard time passing laws if the Liberal Democrats, Green
Party, SNP and
Labour all vote against the Tories» motions.
So, especially if there was ever a significant left of
Labour party which was not the Greens, but
more like Respect / SWP (which I personally doubt would have much support under PR), the other possibility is of a long - term fragmentation which makes any centrist Lab - Green - Lib or Tory - Lib coalition quite difficult.
To answer your question of why
labour has a lot of power in parliament now, is that the conservatives can't pass bills on their own any
more, and
labour can influence individual bills by working with other
parties.
What's
more, the next election will also be fought on new boundaries and 50 fewer seats — unless Theresa May takes advantage of the turmoil in the
Labour party and goes for a snap election in the autumn, as many are now expecting.
Citizen Corbyn, elected with
more votes than the Tories have members as he's fond of warning sceptics, will parade his grassroots legitimacy at
Labour's conference in Brighton next week where he's guaranteed a hero's welcome from the army of activists who feel this time they've really got their
party back.
A major speech on the issue yesterday was preceded by heavy briefing that the
Labour leader would be taking a
more aggressive position in 2017 and that
party apparatchiks would «let Corbyn be Corbyn».
«However, we believe that the prime minister's decision to call this election is a cynical decision driven
more by the weakness of Corbyn's
Labour Party rather than the good of the country.
There has never been a
more important time for the
Labour party to exist and to be firing on all cylinders.
This analysis confirms what we might have anticipated from the evidence of the polls — local authorities appear to contain
more Leave voters if there was a large vote for UKIP there in the 2014 European elections, if there was a small vote for
parties of the «left» (
Labour, Liberal Democrats, Scottish and Welsh Nationalists and Greens) on the same occasion, and in places with relatively low proportions of graduates, young people, and people from an ethnic minority background.
But aside from these calculations, the
more fundamental point here is about
party democracy, and who has and should have sovereignty in the
Labour party.
A fellow - traveler in New York, Thomas Skidmore, soon followed with his own Workingmen's
Party of New York, and wrote in his first message to its members that he, too, thought that the great evil was the rise of modern servitude in the form of wage
labour: «For he, in all countries is a slave, who must work
more for another than that other must work for him.
And now brown and Mandy run back to new
labour to try and get the middle class to vote for it, new
labour is nothing
more then a Thatcherite
party, and she lost and a Pray New
labour is kicked out of power even if it means it never agains takes power
Research by grassroots website LibDemVoice.org found 55 % of
party members want either a coalition deal with
Labour or a
more limited «confidence and supply» arrangement in which the Lib Dems prevent a
Labour administration from falling.
The ebook is unashamedly iconoclastic — at least to those schooled in a
more orthodox reading of
Labour party history — but perhaps its most unexpected claim is to the mantle of conservatism.
But Graham is even
more fascinated by the
Labour leader's most fervent supporters and the way that the
party appears to have transformed since Corbyn arrived on the scene.
In «The Political Animal» Paxman one points out how much
more dynastic the
Labour Party has been than the others Its easier for shall we say, a Toynbee, to be keen on redistribution.
Any attempt to emulate their Marxist language — apart from splitting up the
Labour party — would undoubtedly be ridiculed in Britain, whereas such associations are
more acceptable in Spanish politics.
Ultimately therefore the decision to extend voting rights to younger people will depend on both whether
Labour wins the next election and crucially whether the
party sees it as advantageous to increase its vote share slightly at the expense of becoming
more reliant on a coalition of disparate interests.
The
Labour Party's message to these voters is little
more than «you're wrong».
In the last decades, the PvdA has moved to the center, opening up
more space on the left for the Socialist
Party as pure labour party and green parties such as GroenLinks and the Partij voor de Die
Party as pure
labour party and green parties such as GroenLinks and the Partij voor de Die
party and green
parties such as GroenLinks and the Partij voor de Dieren).
With so much of the 2015 UKIP vote now embedded in the Tory Coalition, and with
Labour now
more officially a
party of soft Brexit, it is very difficult to see how the next election will play out.
Just when it seems the Scottish
Labour Party can inflict no
more damage upon itself, it finds a fresh appetite for pointless masochism.