Sentences with phrase «more slr»

Good question How much more SLR will we see?

If that also allows more SLRs to represent themselves without making, as many of them now do, such a hash of their cases, then that looks like a Win, Win, Win, it seems to me.

Not exact matches

They were still making hay with their gigantic SLR models, adding ever more sensitive sensors to capture even more pixels.

I had taken photography classes through college with my SLR 35 mm camera, but the digital version had way more bells and whistles than what I was used to.

What's more, the app includes features like an auto blurring effect to give images the air of SLR photography, as well as brightness adjustment and flashlight features to increase your shooting options.

The kids were up against a much more experienced team and while they weren't able to pull off even one goal (bummer), they had fun and I had a good time watching them and snapping pics (I even dusted off my SLR for the occasion) until a certain little someone pulled me away to the playground.

There are going to be a lot more books if you have a SLR.

Silvretta Alps, Austris — The dark blue 2016 Mercedes - AMG GT S, unleashed here for the very first time, is the baddest Benz ever made, even meaner than last year's SLS Black Series and more awesome than the mega-expensive yet underwhelming McLaren - engineered SLR.

That's a lot of money, but it's a real alternative to, ahem, M - B's own SLR McLaren, which is even more expensive.

And despite the seemingly ingrained SLR problems — awful brake feel, dead - yet - darty steering and spine - drilling ride (on our car's optional 19in rims at any rate)-- it's a much more likable steer than the coupe.

Somehow, the implications that Paris Hilton owned one briefly (before handing it back, no doubt complaining it was too hard to modulate the throttle during full - on 600 - horsepower drifts wearing five - inch stilettos) stick more tenaciously to the SLR's reputation as the David Hasselhoff of supercars than whatever credibility may have been generated by F1 champ Fernando Alonso's rather longer tenure.

As I don't recall even the regular 616bhp SLR needing more performance, that's no bad thing.

It makes the SLR Roadster, unveiled at Geneva in March and now in production at an eye - watering # 350,000, a more enticing prospect than its coupe cousin, promising to kill stone dead even the subtle scuttle wobbles that afflict the mainstream Merc SL65 and in so doing putting some clear blue water between itself and a car that, on paper, all but matches its straight line pace for less than half the price.

The revised steering is much heavier than I remember, especially at idle and low speed, but it's also less jumpy and more linear in its response, so you feel much more connected to this SLR than the standard car.

This side grille is far more graceful than the clumsy chrome lumps on recent sports models such as the Mercedes SLR Mclaren and the previous SL series.

This white test SLS bears more than a slight resemblance to the outgoing Mercedes SLR McLaren in profile and rear three quarters, the rear lights in particular looking similar to the flawed supercar's.

Today, from a styling perspective, the SLR still looks extraordinary — more so with updated looks from McLaren Special Operations.

There's something of a Mercedes SLR McLaren about the way it does this, except that you'll enjoy the build - up to it much more in the ZR1.

Today the SLR is less likely to be judged against its peers and more as a unique object.

Comparing this car to the vastly more expensive SLR seems laughable, so I won't.

NEW 2017 Polaris Slingshot ® SLR Orange Madness FOR SALE near Jacksonville Ocala FL and Valdosta GA Please call 386.401.4565 Visit us at PolarisOfGainesville.Com for more photos and information about this vehicle.

The AMG boss, Tobias Moers, reveals AMG plans, which include more AMG - GT versions, but not a successor of the SLR.

A front spoiler with additional lateral slats, including 128 LEDs as daytime running lights, should give the SLR a more bullish appearance — while at the same time delivering around 100 kilos of down force at 350 km / h. For such speeds, the gold appliqués and the gold - plated Ueli Anliker logos should also be fastened accordingly.

To meet statutory requirements (like CRR / SLR) banks have to keep certain reserves with RBI, so when percentage of reserves that banks have to keep with RBI comes down, banks may have more monies to do business, this may lead to lower loan rates.

If you do opt to bring your SLR, consider cutting back on lenses and consider the pros and cons of zoom vs. primes lenses; a zoom lens may be more convenient and require less shots, but a single, fixed lens will be lightweight and encourage you to explore more of the area to get the perfect shot!

SLR cameras also have more flexibility than a point and shoot camera which has a built - in lens.

Map Selection Weapon Balancing New Scopes and Attachments New Weapon (SLR) New Vehicle (Mirado) Much more!

In the relevant chapter of the AR5, there is discussion of, for example, the MISI hypothesis, which could, under the «wrong» circumstances, accelerate SLR more rapidly.

T0, 0 ranges from 0 to -10 K (or more) based on a Bayesian analysis: if it is less than about -0.4 K, that would imply that the long - term term of the semi-empirical equation is contributing to SLR for the entire reconstruction.

After the thing is floating, no more contribution to SLR.

Now that I've been able to study figure 2 of the paper better, I see that 3 experts think even in the best case there's about a 5 % chance of more than about 1.5 meters of SLR by 2100, with about 2 meters as highest estimate.

If SLR has been 3.2 cm / decade for 2 decades, how can doubling the temperature increase, or more, lead to SLR of as little as 40 cm this century?

In contrast to other articles I have read, SLR in comes across as no more alarming then the myriad of other uncertainties that exist in the future that may or may not become a major problem that may or may not requires immediate action or public policy changes.

re: «These numbers reflect the FACT that EXPERTS (& PROFESSIONAL TRUTH TELLERS in SLR / Ice loss) have become more pessimistic about sea - level rise in recent years...» — Sept 2013 AR5 WGI does NOT reflect this FACT yet was published 8 weeks ago.

How many experts think SLR could be more than 4m by 2300 and how high do their estimates for the 95th percentile go?

What is the basis that makes the suggestion that the temperatures were not as warm as indicated during AD500 - 1000 more valid than perhaps the M08 reconstruction suggesting that the SLR estimate instead is incorrect?

On the bottom line, i'm interested to discuss reliability and security question's when it comes to nuclear power, because i wonder how safe nuclear plants are in a warmer world with more seismic and SLR.

(The losses we are facing in economic wellbeing and probably personal safety and liberty with the «default SLR» are already way more than I want to bet.)

For those of you who do not read Dutch: The Deltacommissie gives indeed 55 - 110 cm SLR for 2100 global, and the bit more for Holland (executive summary, p. 10, 2nd paragraph) is 0.65 - 1.30 m relative sea level rise (expected in Holland) by 2100, 2 - 4m by 2200.

In a more recent paper, our own Stefan Rahmstorf used a simple regression model to suggest that sea level rise (SLR) could reach 0.5 to 1.4 meters above 1990 levels by 2100, but this did not consider individual processes like dynamic ice sheet changes, being only based on how global sea level has been linked to global warming over the past 120 years.

Risk: E.g., if SL rises on a 5 - year doubling as has been hypothesized by Hansen, et al. as possible, and reinforced by the recent SLR analysis of corals off the Texas coast where SLR rose 1.5 or more meters on decadal scales...?

We do not state anywhere in our paper that 2m or more of SLR by 2100 has been published as a peer reviewed and «informed estimate».

It seems to me that the «One - Two Punch» of a New Northern Hemisphere Ice Age, combined with the kinds of unprecedented (read: MUCH more than 5m) SLR that would accompany it, would constitute the «worst of all possible cases scenario».

I don't think the claim, that there have been stronger SLR in the paleo - record prove Pfeffer any more wrong than claims of vineyards in northern England around 1000ad put Mann wrong.

This is important because * if * resources were more abundant and * if * climate change were happening more slowly and * if * climate could not possibly change multiple degrees and multiple meters of SLR on decadal time scales, my solution set would be vastly different.

My statements Earth sensitivity had to be high, SLR could be 10ft, the SI would go quickly... and more... all treated with disdain, e.g.)

SLR = Sea level rise]-- Two things, IPCC discussed both the (rather predictiable) thermal exapansion and also the (more uncertain) issue of ice sheet melting.

Importantly, they found that SLR will result in stronger increases in the number of moderate (or high - frequency) events in some places, e.g. Charleston or New York on the east coast, whereas other areas will experience a more rapid increase in the number of rare extreme (or low - frequency) events, e.g. Seattle on the west coast.

Therefore, adequate adaptation has to take into account SLR and ESL as well as the uncertainties inherent to both of them (see below for more details).

SLR by 2100 is more likely to come from ice mass loss from West Antarctica (WAIS) where warm ocean currents are already melting ice at glacier mouths and attacking areas of the WAIS resting on the seabed.