Do you want to learn
more about Scripture, and the theological terms and ideas related to the Bible?
I was part of a bible study to where we learned
more about scriptures and the knowledge of Christ, but also needed church for the worship and word.
Not exact matches
I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things
about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is
more than enough proof historically and in present
scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.
I just think some Christians are lazy and don't want to read
more about the totality of
scripture and delve deeper into interpretation... we prefer a grade 3 reading and comprehension level in many aspects of Christianity.
Since young adults perceive evangelical Christianity to be... «unconcerned with social justice», it's a shame that
more evangelical churches don't know
about the Just Faith program, which provides «opportunities for individuals to study and be formed by the justice tradition articulated by the
Scriptures, the Church's historical witness, theological inquiry and Church social teaching» (from jusfaith.org/programs).
What's
more, it in no way invalidates Smith's central point
about Scripture's effect on us.
What I'm actually saying is that I think God is so much bigger and
more incomprehensible than what we read
about Him in
Scripture.
BUT before that, I would recommend that you go and do a good confession... And please, learn
more about your faith and the Holy
Scriptures..
In fact, Jesus had
more to say
about the the dangers of greed, love of possessions, and the lack of compassion for the the «poor» and the «least of these» than he did
about any other single subject in christian
scripture.
Using the
scriptures to address a misperception should be fine, but I could be
more gentle
about it.
If you want to learn
more about what
Scripture teaches
about the words «save» and «grace» and «faith» and how these are related to the gospel, consider taking my course, «The Gospel According to
Scripture.»
As a Baptist minister, the older I get... the
more I study
Scripture... the less I know
about Scripture and
about God... and the
more I teach the simple basics: Man is a sinner in need of a Saviour and guide for both this life and the next, «Come.»
So I think your blog might qualify... though again, it is
more of a blog
about parenting and marriage than
about Scripture and theology, and Paul's is quite a bit like Hyatt's, in that it is
about leadership and influence.
Over time, God has provided
more revelation
about Himself through the
scriptures, Jesus Christ, and the witness of the Holy Spirit.
We used to sing it and jump around and wave our hands because it was a song
about the passage of
Scripture when David dances wildly before the Lord and his wife shames him for it but he retorts that he'll become even
more undignified in his worship.
In this way, we can say that the Hebrew
Scriptures are
more of a revelation
about man than a revelation
about God.
I think the question — comes down to
more what is the fruit of life based on what we believe
about scripture and the way we interpret it.
And it is all in God's plan when new discoveries show that past interpretations of
Scripture regarding the physical realm were incomplete or inaccurate, and He expects us to be constantly seeking to align our understanding with our discoveries, not to cling to interpretations
about the physical realm that arose before
more facts became available to us by the use of our God - given curiosity and intellect.
The
scripture people want to misquote
about not being tempted with
more than you can bear in 1 Corinthians doesn't say that at all in my study of it.
The teaching that men are to be the «spiritual leaders» of their homes is found nowhere in
Scripture, and yet I — along with far too many young evangelical women — spent hours upon hours fretting over this in college, worrying I'd never find a guy who was
more knowledgeable
about the Bible than I, who was always
more emotionally connected to God than I, who was better at leading in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited
more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»!)
That is, you're using the whole of
Scripture and you have passages that are «proofs,» but you also have passages that are
more about what it means to be made in the image of God and, also, a woman.
We will talk
more about predetermination and foreordination in the future posts
about Unconditional Election and the Sovereignty of God, so I don't want to use a lot of room to discuss these issues here, except to say that
Scripture, reason, and experience all seem to point pretty clearly to the fact that God expects us to make wise choices and holds us accountable for the choices and decisions we make.
To learn
more about this way of reading
Scripture and gain a Crucivision theology, buy my book on Amazon today.
The
more I think
about this the
more I realize: The pastor thought his strong faith and belief in the Bible
scripture would prevent him from dying after he was bitten.
By redirecting our thinking
about God to his absence rather than to his presence, we not only portray the true God of the
Scriptures but make him
more credible.
The Ekklesia Project has also produced
about a dozen booklets, with
more to come, on specific practices of the church, such as preparing for marriage, hymn - singing, reading
scripture, evangelizing and so on.
If you want to learn
more about what
Scripture teaches
about the words «save» and «grace» and how these are related to the gospel, consider taking my course, «The Gospel According to
Scripture.»
The best translation is the one that excites you to read and think
about Scripture more.
To read homosexuality into Sodom or Gibeah reveals
more about the reader than it does
about the
scripture.
Several years ago, a protracted, solemn, and highly technical debate raged through several prominent literary journals
about a new edition of Joyce's Ulysses, a debate that reminded one of nothing
more than the fundamentalist - modernist debates
about the historical authenticity of the
Scriptures.
I can totally handle that Jesus came to offer us a different way; but, If we really believe that the Old Testament is the inspired Word of God, or even if we want to understand
more about the culture that gave us these holy
scriptures, what we should do is take courses in Judaism, to get a better understanding of what God was supposed to have been telling the Jews.
Read
about Philip when he witnessed to the eunuch and asked him if he understood the
scriptures, and Philip expounded those to him
more perfectly from Isaiah.
But a
more radical party is raising fundamental questions
about the historically conditioned character of the
Scriptures.
Here we go again —
more scriptures in Hebrews
about doing what is right in God's eyes!
We do not need
more information
about God than is available in
Scripture; what we need, rather, is to grow spiritually in such a way that we have a place for that information in our lives.
If I were Roma and Mark I would be
more worrried
about having to answer to a Just and Holy God for the blatant disregard of His Sacred
Scriptures before I'd worry
about making nice with the president.
Obviously Jesus and the writers of
Scripture treat some sins as
more severe than others (see pp. 5 — 8 of this article), even though Eichenwald mocks anyone who thinks this as showing «that they know next to nothing
about the New Testament.»
I could be a little
more lenient
about this but I don't want to, just to show you how empty your
scripture is.
- When I practice mindfulness while reading
Scripture, I am
more in tune with how the Holy Spirit is speaking to me at that moment and less concerned
about which theological system best explains what I've read.
Matt - I probably know
more than you do
about what the
scriptures say.
Rather than being excited
about some new insight from
Scripture or idea
about theology which I get to pass on to others, my writing has become
more about pageviews, backlinks, ad revenue, email subscriber stats, book sales, and comment counts.
Great faith believes and is convinced and is persuaded
about some of the harder and
more difficult truths of
Scripture, whereas little faith does not believe or is not convinced or persuaded
about these truths.
I wish we all spent
more time obeying the
Scriptures instead of arguing
about them, but sometimes, we argue
about them so that we can know what they say, so that we know how to obey.
Would you mind stepping back to a
more basic level and discussing how one goes
about interpreting
Scripture?
In a recent study» of the evangelical impact on the Victorians titled The Call to Seriousness, Ian Bradley contends that the decline of evangelicalism into narrow bigotry may be dated from
about 1860 and correlated with the rise of a fascination with prophecy and a
more literalistic use of the
Scripture.
I myself am inclined to agree with Barr
about the poverty of this postfundamentalist theology and tradition for the future of evangelicalism — though I would want my evangelical colleagues to understand clearly that I reject this tradition not to reject biblical or evangelical faith but to seek rather a
more adequate conceptual framework through which to be
more faithful to the
Scriptures.
In The Bible Tells Me So, Peter Enns attempts to present an approach to
Scripture which allows for us to accept that it has historical and scientific errors and that it contradicts itself at various places, and yet still retain the Bible as an important witness to the theological and spiritual struggles which were faced by our forefathers in the faith, and
more importantly, as a historical document
about the life of Jesus and how the death and resurrection of Jesus resulted in the transformation of the first century mediterranean world.
I think that McLaren would say that he could help show you that the gospel is way
more than just
about getting saved, but is also a way of living life in the world here and now, and living this way will shift and transform how you view others, read
Scripture, and interact with God.
Whereas the one you would describe as an agnostic theis would come to
scripture with
more than a degree of suspicion
about the divninty of it's contents, written as it is by humans.
If you want to learn
more about this and how these insights help us understand God,
Scripture, theology, current events, politics, and even your very own life, I recommend you get started with my book The Atonement of God.